Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.2, release candidate #0

2019-03-14 Thread Ivan Kelly
With 3 +1 (binding), [Sijie, enrico and me], and no -1 the vote passes. I'll follow up the rest of the process later today. Thanks folks, Ivan On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 11:59 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > > +1 (binding from me too) > > - Licenses are good > - rat, unit tests pass (some issues with check

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.2, release candidate #0

2019-03-14 Thread Ivan Kelly
+1 (binding from me too) - Licenses are good - rat, unit tests pass (some issues with checkstyle, but not going to let that block anything) - sig & sha512 good -Ivan On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 11:05 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > +1 (binding) > run tests on Fedora + java 8 (some known flaky test fa

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.2, release candidate #0

2019-03-13 Thread Enrico Olivelli
+1 (binding) run tests on Fedora + java 8 (some known flaky test faiiled, not blocker for this release) checked signatures and checksums run smoke tests with java 8 and localbookie and the bookkeeper shell Thank you Ivan #shipit Enrico Il giorno lun 11 mar 2019 alle ore 09:05 Sijie Guo ha scrit

Re: [VOTE] Release 4.8.2, release candidate #0

2019-03-11 Thread Sijie Guo
+1 (binding) - verified source & binary package - asc & sha512 are good - artifacts are good - tag is good On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 2:28 AM Ivan Kelly wrote: > Hi everyone, > Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version > 4.8.2, as follows: > [ ] +1, Approve the release > [

[VOTE] Release 4.8.2, release candidate #0

2019-03-08 Thread Ivan Kelly
Hi everyone, Please review and vote on the release candidate #0 for the version 4.8.2, as follows: [ ] +1, Approve the release [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide specific comments) The complete staging area is available for your review, which includes: * Release notes [1] * The off