Il giorno mer 23 gen 2019 alle ore 11:48 Ivan Kelly
ha scritto:
>
> > > ```
> > > class PlacementResult {
> > > T result();
> > > boolean strictlyConformsToPolicy();
> > > }
> >
> > That was my first proposal and I like it. It is clearer and
> > auto-documenting.
> >
> > Given that we are
> > ```
> > class PlacementResult {
> > T result();
> > boolean strictlyConformsToPolicy();
> > }
>
> That was my first proposal and I like it. It is clearer and auto-documenting.
>
> Given that we are changing EnsemblePlacementPolicy at every major
> version, we can defer this refactor to
Il giorno mer 23 gen 2019 alle ore 11:33 Ivan Kelly
ha scritto:
>
> There's no harm in having our own tuple implementation in common, but
> in this instance we should encode more meaning into the returned
> value. As it is, it's not even java documented.
> But in both cases, it looks like the bool
There's no harm in having our own tuple implementation in common, but
in this instance we should encode more meaning into the returned
value. As it is, it's not even java documented.
But in both cases, it looks like the boolean is whether the placement
strictly conforms to the placement policy, so
Il mar 22 gen 2019, 18:38 Sijie Guo ha scritto:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Enrico Olivelli
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > while reviewing 4.9 release I found this problem around a change about
> > EnsemblePlacementPolicy
> >
> > this is the issue
> > https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issue
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 8:40 AM Enrico Olivelli wrote:
> Hi all,
> while reviewing 4.9 release I found this problem around a change about
> EnsemblePlacementPolicy
>
> this is the issue
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1914
>
> The problem is that in public API we should not use thir
Hi all,
while reviewing 4.9 release I found this problem around a change about
EnsemblePlacementPolicy
this is the issue
https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/1914
The problem is that in public API we should not use third party
classes in order to preserve compatibility with incompatible ch
