Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-23 Thread Alex Heneveld
--a Svet. On 20.06.2017 г., at 14:23, Alex Heneveld wrote: I've drafted the documentation for how this could be explained to users. This may be easier to grok than the email: https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/198/files#diff-21dacc664dfe4d0a156d65d768a0f0e2R28 Best Alex

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-22 Thread Aled Sage
e/brooklyn-docs/pull/198/files#diff-21dacc664dfe4d0a156d65d768a0f0e2R28 Best Alex On 19/06/2017 17:39, Alex Heneveld wrote: Hi All- TL;DR - I am proposing that we encourage versions in Brooklyn of the form "1.1.0" or "1.2-qualifier" such as "1.2-SNAPSHOT", silentl

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-22 Thread Svetoslav Neykov
om/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/198/files#diff-21dacc664dfe4d0a156d65d768a0f0e2R28 >>> >>> Best >>> Alex >>> >>> >>> >>> On 19/06/2017 17:39, Alex Heneveld wrote: >>>> Hi All- >>>> >>>>

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-22 Thread Alex Heneveld
/198/files#diff-21dacc664dfe4d0a156d65d768a0f0e2R28 Best Alex On 19/06/2017 17:39, Alex Heneveld wrote: Hi All- TL;DR - I am proposing that we encourage versions in Brooklyn of the form "1.1.0" or "1.2-qualifier" such as "1.2-SNAPSHOT", silently mapping when needed to OSGi as "1.1.0&q

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-22 Thread Svetoslav Neykov
ers. > This may be easier to grok than the email: > > https://github.com/apache/brooklyn-docs/pull/198/files#diff-21dacc664dfe4d0a156d65d768a0f0e2R28 > > Best > Alex > > > > On 19/06/2017 17:39, Alex Heneveld wrote: >> >> Hi All- >> >>

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-20 Thread Geoff Macartney
+1 to your proposal, having read through the examples you give I find them pretty convincing. On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 at 12:30 Alex Heneveld wrote: > ... > > So far, Brooklyn hasn't had an opinion and I liked it that way. > > However when registering OSGi bundles we MUST confirm with OSGi > > versio

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-20 Thread Alex Heneveld
I am proposing that we encourage versions in Brooklyn of the form "1.1.0" or "1.2-qualifier" such as "1.2-SNAPSHOT", silently mapping when needed to OSGi as "1.1.0" or "1.2.0.qualifier" / "1.2.0.SNAPSHOT" Further to my last mai

Re: Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-20 Thread Richard Downer
ply have to call it 1.1.0-richard_1 instead. So as long as we are well documented, and provide good error messages, then I think this is a suitable proposal. +1 On 19 June 2017 at 17:39, Alex Heneveld wrote: > > Hi All- > > TL;DR - I am proposing that we encourage versions in Brooklyn of

Versions in Brooklyn

2017-06-19 Thread Alex Heneveld
Hi All- TL;DR - I am proposing that we encourage versions in Brooklyn of the form "1.1.0" or "1.2-qualifier" such as "1.2-SNAPSHOT", silently mapping when needed to OSGi as "1.1.0" or "1.2.0.qualifier" / "1.2.0.SNAPSHOT" Further