Re: ApacheCon / Thoughtworks TechRadar

2012-11-09 Thread Michel Guymon
Hi, I figure I would pile onto the Buildr vs Maven discussion, this will be a little non sequitur. What I have been doing is using Maven for project info, mostly defining dependencies and where to deploy to. This is what Maven is actually good at, project markup. The perk is all the existin

Add tasks to attach generation tasks to?

2012-11-09 Thread Peter Donald
Hi, Another thing I noticed across a whole bunch of projects is that they usually create a per project task off which they can hang all the code generation tasks off. i.e. They add a task like "myproject:generate" that does all the source generation required for the project. Mostly this is so they

Moving _(:target, :generated) to top level of project

2012-11-09 Thread Peter Donald
Hi, So I have been looking at a bunch of different projects (mostly commercial) and how they use buildr. One thing I noticed is that a large proportion of them move _(:target, :generated) to the top level of the project. So a typical project may look like; layout = Layout::Default.new layout[:ta

Re: ApacheCon / Thoughtworks TechRadar

2012-11-09 Thread Peter Donald
Huya, On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 5:21 AM, Tammo van Lessen wrote: > First, I got a Buildr talk accepted at ApacheCon EU in Sinsheim, Germany, > which I held just yesterday. congrats! > I got a lot of positive feedback, people seem > to like the buildr idea although it also seems that Maven improve

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.9 release

2012-11-09 Thread Peter Donald
The vote passed with 3 +1's (3 binding) and no -1. Pushing the release to the mirrors ... -- Cheers, Peter Donald

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.9 release

2012-11-09 Thread Antoine Toulme
+1 (binding) as well. On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alex Boisvert wrote: > Ok, thanks for the info. I haven't been able to reproduce myself. > > Here's my +1 (binding) for the release. > > alex > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Peter Donald >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I actually found it qu

Re: [VOTE] Buildr 1.4.9 release

2012-11-09 Thread Alex Boisvert
Ok, thanks for the info. I haven't been able to reproduce myself. Here's my +1 (binding) for the release. alex On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Peter Donald wrote: > Hi, > > I actually found it quite hard to reproduce. It seems to depend on the > order in which the gems are installed and I see

ApacheCon / Thoughtworks TechRadar

2012-11-09 Thread Tammo van Lessen
Hi devs, I've got two things I'd like to share with you: First, I got a Buildr talk accepted at ApacheCon EU in Sinsheim, Germany, which I held just yesterday. I got a lot of positive feedback, people seem to like the buildr idea although it also seems that Maven improved since the inception of B