[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17257068#comment-17257068
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on BVAL-184:
---
@romain:
actually it's already used exactly in a jax-rs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17257044#comment-17257044
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on BVAL-184:
---
i had a discussion with romain, but we couldn't find
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:57 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:41 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:15 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199
]
Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:14 AM
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199
]
Gerhard Petracek commented on BVAL-184:
---
[~romain.manni-bucau]
just drop the spi config[1][2] (or its
Gerhard Petracek created BVAL-184:
-
Summary: Support for proxied instances
Key: BVAL-184
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184
Project: BVal
Issue Type: New Feature
+1
regards,
gerhard
2017-10-27 17:59 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson :
> After a positive reaction to last week's discussion thread, I am calling a
> formal vote.
>
> [ ] +1, migrate to git
> [ ] +/-0, no preference
> [ ] -1, remain on subversion
>
> This vote will be open for at
@matt: +1
regards,
gerhard
2013/9/17 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
On Sep 17, 2013 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Well for *spec* users it is not important Matt.
You are correct, but I still say (and I'm not the first) that we need to
provide a stable
great to see the new logo on the site!
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse -
JavaEE Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2012/12/13 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com
Hi all,
Inspired by the recent
hi @ all,
please have a look at [1] and vote.
[ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo
[ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo
[ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)
Message -
From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com
To: dev@bval.apache.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: Are we ready for a 1.0 release candidate?
hi matt,
+1! for a release, but i'm not sure if we should call it v1.0
already (if i
13 matches
Mail list logo