[jira] [Commented] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-31 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17257068#comment-17257068 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on BVAL-184: --- @romain: actually it's already used exactly in a jax-rs

[jira] [Commented] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-31 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17257044#comment-17257044 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on BVAL-184: --- i had a discussion with romain, but we couldn't find

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:57 AM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:41 AM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:15 AM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199 ] Gerhard Petracek edited comment on BVAL-184 at 12/9/20, 12:14 AM

[jira] [Commented] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17246199#comment-17246199 ] Gerhard Petracek commented on BVAL-184: --- [~romain.manni-bucau] just drop the spi config[1][2] (or its

[jira] [Created] (BVAL-184) Support for proxied instances

2020-12-08 Thread Gerhard Petracek (Jira)
Gerhard Petracek created BVAL-184: - Summary: Support for proxied instances Key: BVAL-184 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-184 Project: BVal Issue Type: New Feature

Re: [VOTE] Migrate BVal SCM to git

2017-10-30 Thread Gerhard Petracek
+1 regards, gerhard 2017-10-27 17:59 GMT+02:00 Matt Benson : > After a positive reaction to last week's discussion thread, I am calling a > formal vote. > > [ ] +1, migrate to git > [ ] +/-0, no preference > [ ] -1, remain on subversion > > This vote will be open for at

Re: BVal 1.0 and 1.1

2013-09-17 Thread Gerhard Petracek
@matt: +1 regards, gerhard 2013/9/17 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com On Sep 17, 2013 12:30 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote: Well for *spec* users it is not important Matt. You are correct, but I still say (and I'm not the first) that we need to provide a stable

Re: Website

2012-12-15 Thread Gerhard Petracek
great to see the new logo on the site! regards, gerhard http://www.irian.at Your JSF/JavaEE powerhouse - JavaEE Consulting, Development and Courses in English and German Professional Support for Apache MyFaces 2012/12/13 Matt Benson gudnabr...@gmail.com Hi all, Inspired by the recent

[vote] project logo

2012-07-28 Thread Gerhard Petracek
hi @ all, please have a look at [1] and vote. [ ] +1 we should use it as the new bval logo [ ] +0 it's ok because it's better than the current logo [ ] -1 i don't like it and we should keep the current logo (for now)

Re: Are we ready for a 1.0 release candidate?

2012-03-19 Thread Gerhard Petracek
Message - From: Gerhard Petracek gerhard.petra...@gmail.com To: dev@bval.apache.org Cc: Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 6:18 PM Subject: Re: Are we ready for a 1.0 release candidate? hi matt, +1! for a release, but i'm not sure if we should call it v1.0 already (if i