=false -Pit verify
-fn) KO
A brief summary of the errors is given below:
[ERROR] Tests run: 290, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 21, Time elapsed:
23.703 s <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.calcite.test.JdbcTest (MySQL)
[ERROR] Tests run: 290, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 21, Time elapsed:
+1 (binding) checked hashes and signature, compiled and ran tests and
a RAT check.
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
Le ven. 15 mars 2019 à 10:38, Kevin Risden a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.19.0, release candidate 1.
>
> Thanks t
+1 (binding)
Checked hashes, KEYS, LICENSE, NOTICE, README; checked that contents
of tar match git; compiled and ran tests using JDK 11 on Ubuntu linux.
Verified that maven-wrapper.jar has gone.
Julian
On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 7:38 AM Kevin Risden wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have cre
Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.19.0, release candidate 1.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
Since RC 0, we have fixed the following issues:
* [CALCITE-2925] Exclude maven-wrapper.jar from source distribution
You can read the release notes here:
https
vlsi commented on a change in pull request #85: [CALCITE-2704] Avoid use of
ISO-8859-1 to parse request in JsonHandler
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/85#discussion_r256155266
##
File path:
server/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/avatica/server
vlsi opened a new pull request #85: [CALCITE-2704] Avoid use of ISO-8859-1 to
parse request in JsonHandler
URL: https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/85
I'm pretty confident that this one fixes
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2704, and this change should be
ambition created CALCITE-2749:
-
Summary: org.apache.calcite.sql.parser.SqlParseException: Lexical
error at line 1, column 13. Encountered: "`" (96), after : ""
Key: CALCITE-2749
URL: https://is
at 8:44 AM Zoltan Haindrich wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've run the Hive tests and I've found something which might cause problems:
>> in CALCITE-1413 we were extra cautious to not simplify cases like:
>> CASE a=0 THEN 0 ELSE 1/a END
>> and it worked c
he Hive tests and I've found something which might cause problems:
> in CALCITE-1413 we were extra cautious to not simplify cases like:
> CASE a=0 THEN 0 ELSE 1/a END
> and it worked correctly; however: RexProgramBuilder is also executes simplify
> - but the protection at that point
Hello,
I've run the Hive tests and I've found something which might cause problems: in
CALCITE-1413 we were extra cautious to not simplify cases like:
CASE a=0 THEN 0 ELSE 1/a END
and it worked correctly; however: RexProgramBuilder is also executes simplify -
but the protection at
+1 (binding) checked sig and hashes, compiled and ran tests from git commit
and tar.gz.
Francis -
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR] OsAdapterTest.testFiles:146
Expected: "type=d\ntype=f"
but: was ""
I'm pretty sure this happens when Alpine linux doesn't have
+1 (non binding)
- checked signature and checksum
- built from source, all tests pass on OracleJDK8 on Linux
- all tests from downstream project (HerdDB) are passing
Still great work !
Thank you Julian for driving the release
Enrico
Il giorno ven 7 dic 2018 alle ore 02:44 Francis Chuang
ha
Thanks for making this available for voting, Julian!
+1 (binding)
Environment: Debian Sid, OpenJDK 11.0.1, maven 3.6.0 in a docker container
- Verified GPG signature - OK
- Verified SHA256 - OK
- Ran "mvn -DskipTests clean install" - OK
- Ran "mvn test" - OK
I also teste
+1 (binding) checked hashes and signature and compiled and ran tests.
Thanks for the fixes!
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
Le jeu. 6 déc. 2018 à 03:19, Julian Hyde a écrit :
> OK, let's try again.
>
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.18.0, release candidate 1.
+1 (non binding)
System: Ubuntu 18.04 LTS and jdk1.8.0.66
-run mvn clean install on staged sources and git repo
-checked signatures and checksums
-went quickly over release note
Everything looks good! I have only a small question: should the release
note mention new dependencies (e.g
OK, let's try again.
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.18.0, release candidate 1.
Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this release.
Since RC 0, we have fixed the following issues:
* [CALCITE-2726] ReduceExpressionRule oversimplifies filter conditions
containing nulls
* [CA
Hongze Zhang created CALCITE-2593:
-
Summary: Failed to plan when SQL is like "sum(X + 1) filter (where
Y)"
Key: CALCITE-2593
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2593
Projec
Vladimir Sitnikov created CALCITE-2581:
--
Summary: RexSimplify: and(nullBool, not(or(nullBool, vBool(1
fails with assertion error
Key: CALCITE-2581
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2581
Andrew Pilloud created CALCITE-2572:
---
Summary: Calcite substring fails with a start position less than 1.
Key: CALCITE-2572
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2572
Project: Calcite
The vote for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.1.0, release candidate 1 has
been cancelled.
A new release will be tagged as 3.1.0-rc2 and will be available for
voting soon.
Francis
TICE, copyright should be 2012-2018 not 2012-2017.
Due to these issues, my vote is -1.
Checked LICENSE, README.md, checksums/signatures, file headers.
I did not build or run tests, or check that dependencies have suitable
licenses. I don't know enough about Go. Can someone else please do
that.
gt; .idea/dataSources.local.xml
>> .idea/usage.statistics.xml
>> .idea/misc.xml
>> .idea/dataSources.xml
>> .idea/modules.xml
>>
>> In NOTICE, copyright should be 2012-2018 not 2012-2017.
>>
>> Due to these issues, my vote is -1.
>>
>>
hese issues, my vote is -1.
Checked LICENSE, README.md, checksums/signatures, file headers.
I did not build or run tests, or check that dependencies have suitable
licenses. I don't know enough about Go. Can someone else please do
that.
Julian
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 3:38 PM Francis Chu
xml
> > .idea/dataSources/ed276130-2ebd-463d-b1a0-78e39ca4d29f.xml
> > .idea/calcite-avatica-go.iml
> > .idea/watcherTasks.xml
> > .idea/dataSources.local.xml
> > .idea/usage.statistics.xml
> > .idea/misc.xml
> > .idea/dataSources.xml
> > .idea/modules.xml
> &g
.xml
.idea/usage.statistics.xml
.idea/misc.xml
.idea/dataSources.xml
.idea/modules.xml
In NOTICE, copyright should be 2012-2018 not 2012-2017.
Due to these issues, my vote is -1.
Checked LICENSE, README.md, checksums/signatures, file headers.
I did not build or run tests, or check that dependencies hav
.idea/calcite-avatica-go.iml
.idea/watcherTasks.xml
.idea/dataSources.local.xml
.idea/usage.statistics.xml
.idea/misc.xml
.idea/dataSources.xml
.idea/modules.xml
In NOTICE, copyright should be 2012-2018 not 2012-2017.
Due to these issues, my vote is -1.
Checked LICENSE, README.md, checksums
Hongze Zhang created CALCITE-2530:
-
Summary: Reasonable behavior of TRIM function when the length of
trim character is not 1(one)
Key: CALCITE-2530
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2530
/2018 10:35 AM, Francis Chuang wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a release for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.1.0, release
candidate 1.
The release notes are available here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/blob/master/site/_docs/go_history.md
The commit to be voted on:
http://git-wip
Hi all,
I have created a release for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.1.0, release
candidate 1.
The release notes are available here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/blob/master/site/_docs/go_history.md
The commit to be voted on:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite-avatica
Vladimir Sitnikov created CALCITE-2505:
--
Summary: RexSimplify: isFalse(isNotDistinctFrom(vBool(0),
vBool(1))) causes AssertionError: wrong operand count 1 for IS DISTINCT FROM
Key: CALCITE-2505
URL: https
Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their
comments and votes.
The tally is as follows.
4 binding +1s:
Francis Chuang
Josh Elser
Julian Hyde
Michael Mior
1 non-binding +1s:
Kevin Risden
No 0s or -1s.
Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to
Thanks for the heads up, Julian! I will update the
make-release-artifacts script and the documentation.
On 25/04/2018 9:01 AM, Julian Hyde wrote:
One more thing. The new release policy[1] says "SHOULD NOT provide a MD5-file”.
My vote on this RC is still +1. But let’s remove the .md5 file
One more thing. The new release policy[1] says "SHOULD NOT provide a MD5-file”.
My vote on this RC is still +1. But let’s remove the .md5 file next release.
.sha256 and .asc are all we need.
[1] http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#sigs-and-sums
<http://www.apache.org/dev
+1 (binding) Compiled and ran tests and checked hashes and signature.
Thanks Francis!
--
Michael Mior
mm...@uwaterloo.ca
2018-04-22 20:05 GMT-04:00 Francis Chuang :
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a release for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.0.0, release
> candidate 1.
>
> The
+1 (binding)
Downloaded, checked checksums (could not check signatures due to gpg
problems on my machine), checked headers, LICENSE, NOTICE, README.md.
Julian
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Josh Elser wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> * xsums+sigs OK
> * KEYS updated and signing key
+1 (binding)
* xsums+sigs OK
* KEYS updated and signing key is published
* No binary files in src release
* License headers on relevant files
* LICENSE is OK
* NOTICE is OK
Good work, Francis!
On 4/22/18 8:05 PM, Francis Chuang wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a release for Apache Calcite
supported to reduce confusion.
+1 for removing 1.7+ since it seems like a promise we can't easily keep.
Kevin Risden
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 8:42 PM, Francis Chuang
wrote:
Thanks for the review, Kevin! Please see my response in line.
On 23/04/2018 11:18 AM, Kevin Risden wrote:
* Ran tes
Thanks for the quick cleanup response.
> I will add Go 1.9 to the travis file, but maybe we should just remove the
note that Go 1.7+ is supported to reduce confusion.
+1 for removing 1.7+ since it seems like a promise we can't easily keep.
Kevin Risden
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 8:42 PM,
ore - doesn't ignore golang/intellij files
- I've copied all IDE files from Calcite's gitignore into avatica-go's
gitignore.
* goreportcard -
https://goreportcard.com/report/github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go -
lists some minor things
- These are some minor things we can
m/report/github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go -
lists some minor things
None of the above are show stoppers for me.
+1 (non-binding)
Kevin Risden
On Sun, Apr 22, 2018 at 7:05 PM, Francis Chuang
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a release for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.0.0, rele
Hi all,
I have created a release for Apache Calcite Avatica Go 3.0.0, release
candidate 1.
The release notes are available here:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/blob/master/site/go_history.md
The commit to be voted on:
http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite-avatica-go
Laurent Goujon created CALCITE-2218:
---
Summary: AvaticaResultSet#getRow() is not 1-indexed based
Key: CALCITE-2218
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2218
Project: Calcite
gt;
>
> On Jan 7, 2018, at 4:00 AM, jincheng sun wrote:
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> I'm a bit confused by the different optimization of COUNT (1) in OVER
> window and tumble window.
>
> When we parse a SQL:
>
> select COUNT(1) from T tumble(rowtime, i
sunjincheng created CALCITE-2126:
Summary: Optimization of COUNT (1) in OVER window
Key: CALCITE-2126
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2126
Project: Calcite
Issue Type
NULL; we make
that optimization in non-windowed AVG, and it is a useful one.
Julian
> On Jan 7, 2018, at 4:00 AM, jincheng sun wrote:
>
> Hi Julian,
>
> I'm a bit confused by the different optimization of COUNT (1) in OVER window
> and tumble window.
>
> Whe
Hi Julian,
I'm a bit confused by the different optimization of COUNT (1) in OVER
window and tumble window.
When we parse a SQL:
select COUNT(1) from T tumble(rowtime, interval 2 seconds)
In RexBuild.addAggCall will do the optimize as follows:
if(aggCall.getAggregation() insta
Thanks to everyone who has tested both release candidates and given
their comments and votes.
The tally is as follows: 3 binding +1s (Aman, Julian, Michael), 1
non-binding +1 (Enrico), no 0s or -1s.
Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
Apache Calcite 1.15.0 has
LGTM. +1
Downloaded the source tar file from [1] on my Linux VM. Untarred and built
using openJdk 1.8 and ran unit tests. All tests ran successfully.
Also, I did not see the extraneous 'scott.tmp' directory that I saw in
RC0.
-Aman
[1]
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/calc
Vote ends in 12 hours. Please download the release and vote!
> On Dec 7, 2017, at 9:45 AM, Michael Mior wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified signature and hashes of the tarball and compiled and ran tests.
> Thanks for the fixes Julian!
>
> --
> Michael Mior
> mm
+1 (binding)
Verified signature and hashes of the tarball and compiled and ran tests.
Thanks for the fixes Julian!
--
Michael Mior
mm...@apache.org
2017-12-06 2:34 GMT-05:00 Julian Hyde :
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.15.0, release candidate 1.
>
> Ch
+1 (non binding)
Checked source tar ball, notes.
- mvn clean install, build OK
- All tests pass except from one (OsAdapterTest), see the below, not a
blocker, it depends on my SO (Linux Fedora 25)
- All tests passes on HerdDB
Enrico
Tests run: 12, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 2, Time
Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.15.0, release candidate 1.
Changes since the previous release candidate: fixed the show-stopper
CALCITE-2074, fixed the two minor issues raised in the last vote (CALCITE-2070
and a doc fix to watch out for scott.tmp), and also fixed CALCITE
Sergio Sainz created CALCITE-1939:
-
Summary: DatabaseMetaData.getColumns() returns -1 for columns
COLUMN_SIZE , BUFFER_LENGTH and DECIMAL_DIGITS
Key: CALCITE-1939
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user F21 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/pull/1
@julianhyde I've added the headers. Please take a look.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user julianhyde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/pull/1
If you add Apache headers to all files, I think this change is good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user julianhyde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/pull/1
By "release history" I mean something like
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/blob/master/site/_docs/history.md,
which is updated on each release and beco
GitHub user F21 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go/pull/1
WIP: Initial import of the avatica-go client
cc @joshelser @julianhyde
Todo:
- [x] Switch imports from github.com/Boostport/avatica to
github.com/apache/calcite-avatica-go
Julian Hyde created CALCITE-1907:
Summary: Table function with 1 column gives ClassCastException
Key: CALCITE-1907
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1907
Project: Calcite
zhou degao created CALCITE-1865:
---
Summary: select count(1) from (select sum(1) without
group by failed
Key: CALCITE-1865
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1865
Project
input table. Hence, the
resulting table is a dynamic table as well."
Regards,
Shaoxuan
On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 1:05 AM, Tyler Akidau
wrote:
> Being able to support an EMIT config independent of the query itself sounds
> great for compatible use cases (which should be many :-).
>
the
name is to simply to imply it can evolve and change over time?
-Tyler
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 1:59 AM Shaoxuan Wang wrote:
> Thanks to Tyler and Fabian for sharing your thoughts.
>
> Regarding to the early/late update control of FLINK. IMO, each dynamic
> table can have an EMIT
ort for group window (TUMBLE, HOP, SESSION),
> > OVER
> > > RANGE/ROW window (without FOLLOWING), and non-windowed GROUP BY
> > > aggregations. The group windows are triggered by watermark and the over
> > > window and non-windowed aggregations emit for each input rec
ndowed GROUP BY
> > aggregations. The group windows are triggered by watermark and the over
> > window and non-windowed aggregations emit for each input record
> > (AtCount(1)). The window aggregations do not support early or late firing
> > (late records are dropped), so no upd
the upcoming 1.3.0
> release, we will have support for group window (TUMBLE, HOP, SESSION), OVER
> RANGE/ROW window (without FOLLOWING), and non-windowed GROUP BY
> aggregations. The group windows are triggered by watermark and the over
> window and non-windowed aggregations emit for
BY
aggregations. The group windows are triggered by watermark and the over
window and non-windowed aggregations emit for each input record
(AtCount(1)). The window aggregations do not support early or late firing
(late records are dropped), so no updates here. However, the non-windowed
aggregates
>
>> > On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:26 PM Kenneth Knowles > >
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > There's something to be said about having different triggering
>> depending
>> > on
>> > > which side of a join data comes from, perhaps?
>> > >
Julian Hyde created CALCITE-1775:
Summary: Druid adapter: "GROUP BY ()" on empty relation should
return 1 row
Key: CALCITE-1775
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1775
Apr 21, 2017 at 2:26 PM Kenneth Knowles
> > wrote:
> >
> > > There's something to be said about having different triggering
> depending
> > on
> > > which side of a join data comes from, perhaps?
> > >
> > > (delightful doc, as usual)
> >
; -Tyler
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 2:26 PM Kenneth Knowles
> wrote:
>
> > There's something to be said about having different triggering depending
> on
> > which side of a join data comes from, perhaps?
> >
> > (delightful doc, as usual)
> >
&g
s usual)
>
> Kenn
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Tyler Akidau
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks for reading, Luke. The simple answer is that CoGBK is basically
> > flatten + GBK. Flatten is a non-grouping operation that merges the input
> > streams into a single output st
There's something to be said about having different triggering depending on
which side of a join data comes from, perhaps?
(delightful doc, as usual)
Kenn
On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Tyler Akidau
wrote:
> Thanks for reading, Luke. The simple answer is that CoGBK is basically
&
drive forward agreement on a general streaming SQL
> > spec between our three communities (well, technically I volunteered to do
> > that w/ Beam and Calcite, but I figured you Flink folks might want to
> join
> > in since you're going that direction already anyway and will h
technically I volunteered to do
> that w/ Beam and Calcite, but I figured you Flink folks might want to join
> in since you're going that direction already anyway and will have useful
> insights :-).
>
> My plan was to do this by sharing two docs:
>
>1. The Beam
an was to do this by sharing two docs:
1. The Beam Model : Streams & Tables - This one is for context, and
really only mentions SQL in passing. But it describes the relationship
between the Beam Model and the "streams & tables" way of thinking, which
turns out to be useful
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user julianhyde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/1#discussion_r109268544
--- Diff: .travis.yml ---
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ branches:
- /^branch-.*$/
- /^[0-9]+-.*$/
install:
- - cd avatica &&
one through, by the way.
Julian
> On Mar 31, 2017, at 5:15 PM, julianhyde wrote:
>
> Github user julianhyde commented on the issue:
>
>https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/1
>
>Builds fine. Tests pass. Intellij loads up fine.
>
>* In pom
Github user julianhyde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/1
Builds fine. Tests pass. Intellij loads up fine.
* In pom.xml, change connection and developerConnection to
scm:git:https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/calcite.git - otherwise
GitHub user joshelser opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/1
CALCITE-1717 Add Avatica and remove the rest of Calcite
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/joshelser/calcite-avatica
Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given
their comments and votes.
The tally is as follows.
4 binding +1s:
Aman
Jesus
Josh
Julian
1 non-binding +1s:
Michael
No 0s or -1s.
Therefore I am delighted to announce that the proposal to release
Apache Calcite 1.12.0 has
+1
Downloaded the source tarball to my Linux VM and built, ran unit tests.
Encountered 1 failure in
PigRelBuilderStyleTest.testImplWithGroupByCountDistinct which is similar to
Calcite-1561 but re-running within the suite succeeded, so I am inclined to go
with +1.
All other tests passed
+1 (binding)
Downloaded the tarball, compiled, ran testsuite.
Integrated with Hive + HIVE-15708 and ran some q tests.
--
Jesús
On 3/21/17, 10:37 PM, "Josh Elser" wrote:
>+1 (binding)
>
>* Re-checked sigs/xsums
>* Verified changes made over rc0
>
>Julian Hyde wr
+1 (binding)
* Re-checked sigs/xsums
* Verified changes made over rc0
Julian Hyde wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.12.0, release candidate 1.
The only changes since release candidate 0 are:
* fixes to issues CALCITE-1715 and CALCITE-1716,
* corresponding
+1 (non-binding). Checked signature and hash of the tarball, compiled and
ran tests. Cassandra integration tests pass this time.
--
Michael Mior
michael.m...@gmail.com
2017-03-20 22:33 GMT-04:00 Julian Hyde :
> Hi all,
>
> I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.12.0, release ca
Hi all,
I have created a build for Apache Calcite 1.12.0, release candidate 1.
The only changes since release candidate 0 are:
* fixes to issues CALCITE-1715 and CALCITE-1716,
* corresponding modifications to the release history,
* some unrelated changes on in the avatica sub-project.
Thanks
. Therefore you need to implement the ‘test’ method. I recommend
> that you make your Predicate class extend PredicateImpl.
>
> You can test using ‘mvn clean site -Dguava.version=21.0’.
>
> Julian
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> *Subject: **calcite regress 824d7e7 ori
using ‘mvn clean site -Dguava.version=21.0’.
Julian
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Subject: calcite regress 824d7e7 origin/master jdk8 status: 1 "[CALCITE-1628]
> Add an alternative match pattern for SemiJoinRule"
> Date: February 10, 2017 at 3:11:25 AM PST
>
>
bject: Re: calcite regress a07c742 origin/master jdk9 status: 1
"[CALCITE-1619] CAST is ignored by rules pushing operators into DruidQuery"
Jesus, I can check in a fix for this with some other PRs. Since it’s late for
you, I assume you’re not working on it, but let me know if you are
error. It shows up on JDK
> 8 and 9, not sure about 7. Please run “mvn site” under JDK 8 or 9 before
> committing.
>
> Julian
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> Subject: calcite regress a07c742 origin/master jdk9 status: 1
>> "[CALCITE-16
Jesus,
Your recent commit broke the build due to a javadoc error. It shows up on JDK 8
and 9, not sure about 7. Please run “mvn site” under JDK 8 or 9 before
committing.
Julian
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> Subject: calcite regress a07c742 origin/master jdk9 status: 1 "
Julian Hyde created CALCITE-1552:
Summary: Add RAND function, returning DOUBLE values in the range
0..1
Key: CALCITE-1552
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-1552
Project: Calcite
Thanks to everyone who has tested the release candidate and given their
comments and votes.
The vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes (Julian, Alan, James, Josh) and 1
non-binding +1 (Aaron). I am therefore delighted to announce that the proposal
to release Apache Calcite 1.9.0 has passed. I’ll
Josh’s patch did the trick (with a couple of other changes to keep maven happy
with respect to unused dependencies), so we’re good. My +1 remains a +1. And
thanks, Josh, for finding a solution. I’ll send an official result.
Julian
> On Oct 30, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
due to Avatica fixing a
> long-standing dependency-bundling issue (in its shaded jar). Calcite was
> expecting to use Jackson (non-relocated) with the Avatica shaded jar which is
> now correctly relocating Jackson because it bundles it.
>
> I tried to write up a better description o
ed to write up a better description on JIRA [1]
I believe the proper fix is to switch Calcite to using
org.apache.calcite.avatica:avatica-core instead of
org.apache.calcite.avatica:avatica. If Calcite wants to create shaded
artifacts for downstream consumption, we should be creating custom
s
is a showstopper. I am
> going to let the vote hang in limbo until I hear some other opinions
> about this issue.
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:54 PM, James Taylor
> wrote:
> > +1. Validated that all tests pass in Phoenix with Avatica 1.9.0 RC.
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 2
, 2016 at 3:54 PM, James Taylor wrote:
> +1. Validated that all tests pass in Phoenix with Avatica 1.9.0 RC.
>
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
>
>> +1. Did a build, checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files, checked the
>> signatures.
>>
>> Ala
+1. Validated that all tests pass in Phoenix with Avatica 1.9.0 RC.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 1:45 PM, Alan Gates wrote:
> +1. Did a build, checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files, checked the
> signatures.
>
> Alan.
>
> > On Oct 28, 2016, at 11:05, Julian Hyde wrote:
> &g
+1. Did a build, checked the LICENSE and NOTICE files, checked the signatures.
Alan.
> On Oct 28, 2016, at 11:05, Julian Hyde wrote:
>
> We need one more PMC vote. Vote ends in 30 hours. But you probably don’t want
> to vote on a weekend. :)
>
> Julian
>
>
>&g
201 - 300 of 348 matches
Mail list logo
