Hello,
I would like to request review for CALCITE-5230, which fixes the return
type derivation of PERCENTILE_DISC.
PR: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/2868
Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5230
Thanks!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4670 <
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4670> ] and also to
>> change
>>>> the implementation strategy [
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-4666 <
>>>> htt
Is PERCENTILE_DISC able to deduce return types from its arguments today?
> >> If so, how does it do it?
> >>
> >> Julian
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Aug 3, 2022, at 1:40 PM, Itiel Sadeh >
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> H
Itiel Sadeh created CALCITE-5230:
Summary: PERCENTILE_DISC return type derivation
Key: CALCITE-5230
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-5230
Project: Calcite
Issue Type: Bug
oday?
>> If so, how does it do it?
>>
>> Julian
>>
>>
>>> On Aug 3, 2022, at 1:40 PM, Itiel Sadeh
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> First of all I just wanted to thank all of you for the work you are doing
>>>
types from its arguments today?
> If so, how does it do it?
>
> Julian
>
>
> > On Aug 3, 2022, at 1:40 PM, Itiel Sadeh
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > First of all I just wanted to thank all of you for the work you are doing
> > on Calcite.
&g
ction, but we
> encounter a problem.
> Our percentile_disc return type is dependent on the column of the "order
> by" clause (just like postgresql
> <https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/functions-aggregate.html>).
> However, I don't see how to achieve th
Hello,
First of all I just wanted to thank all of you for the work you are doing
on Calcite.
We want to add support for the percentile_disc aggregate function, but we
encounter a problem.
Our percentile_disc return type is dependent on the column of the "order
by" clause (just like
