ApacheCon NA 2013

2013-02-12 Thread Christian Müller
ApacheCon NA 2013 starts in less than two weeks! I will be there from Feb. 25th until Mar. 1st as I mentioned here [1]. Feel free to list yourself on the "Who Arrives When" page and/or share the information here. I'm very interested to know who will join us and when! After arriving in Portland we

Re: YourKit License

2013-02-12 Thread Scott England-Sullivan
Thanks Raul! On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Raul Kripalani wrote: > Hey Scott, > > Check their website. "Purchase" section, "Open Source" tab. You just > contact them on their sales email. > I sent the email from my Apache address and included a link to the Camel > Team page. > > Regards, > R

[DISCUSS CAMEL 3.0] weekly IRC chat at 02/12/2013 7:00PM - 8:00PM CET

2013-02-12 Thread Christian Müller
This was the today's discussion on IRC (irc://irc.codehaus.org/camel). Feel free to join the next time and/or comment on the today's discussed items. The next one is scheduled for 02/19/2013 7:00PM - 8:00PM CET. Feel free to join and express your ideas/needs/whishes/... 02/12/2013 7:00PM - 8:00PM

RE: Support for zip (de)compression

2013-02-12 Thread Daniel Gredler
Hi guys, I've uploaded an updated patch. Let me know if there's anything else that needs changing. Take care, Daniel -Original Message- From: Daniel Gredler [mailto:dgred...@dhlglobalmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 12:13 PM To: dev@camel.apache.org Subject: RE: Support for

Re: YourKit License

2013-02-12 Thread Raul Kripalani
Hey Scott, Check their website. "Purchase" section, "Open Source" tab. You just contact them on their sales email. I sent the email from my Apache address and included a link to the Camel Team page. Regards, Raúl. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:51 PM, Scott England-Sullivan wrote: > Hello all, > >

Re: [DISCUSS] Camel 2.10.4 and 2.9.6 releases

2013-02-12 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
There is another security issue in CXF that may require a release. It's being investigated now. The backup option is to make a copy of the cxf features in camel temporarily. We'll know in a couple of days and redo the release. Cheers, Hadrian On 02/09/2013 09:47 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: Cl

RE: Support for zip (de)compression

2013-02-12 Thread Daniel Gredler
Hi Henryk, Claus, Cool, thanks for the feedback! I'll update the patch and upload it. Take care, Daniel -Original Message- From: Claus Ibsen [mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2013 9:09 AM To: dev@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: Support for zip (de)compression O

Re: Why do we allow executing service shutdown logic twice (or more times)?

2013-02-12 Thread Raul Kripalani
Cool, Claus, thanks for the clarification! Will commit my pending fixes in a few hours. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:49 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm debugging why a pair of VM producer-consumer become disconnected in > an > > O

Re: Why do we allow executing service shutdown logic twice (or more times)?

2013-02-12 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Raul Kripalani wrote: > Hi, > > I'm debugging why a pair of VM producer-consumer become disconnected in an > OSGi environment when the consumer bundle is restarted. See [1]. > > I can trace it back to the SedaEndpoint being shutdown twice: 1) when the > route is sh

Re: Support for zip (de)compression

2013-02-12 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Henryk Konsek wrote: > Hi Daniel, > >> The current ZipDataFormat actually >> implements "deflate" (de)compression. > > I like this idea, as I needed such component myself. > > I suggest however to rename it to camel-zipfile data format, because > a) zip2 should be

Why do we allow executing service shutdown logic twice (or more times)?

2013-02-12 Thread Raul Kripalani
Hi, I'm debugging why a pair of VM producer-consumer become disconnected in an OSGi environment when the consumer bundle is restarted. See [1]. I can trace it back to the SedaEndpoint being shutdown twice: 1) when the route is shutdown and 2) when the context is shutdown. Why doesn't ServiceSupp

Re: About 4 method signatures by the ClassResolver API

2013-02-12 Thread Babak Vahdat
Yes but then I think in Camel 3.0 we should better update the Javadoc of this contract and restrict the usage through adding a check for the passed class object which would guranntee a correct API usage: if (!clazz.isInterface()) { throw ... } To avoid the illusion for the end user the c

Re: Support for zip (de)compression

2013-02-12 Thread Henryk Konsek
Hi Daniel, > The current ZipDataFormat actually > implements "deflate" (de)compression. I like this idea, as I needed such component myself. I suggest however to rename it to camel-zipfile data format, because a) zip2 should be reserved for better version of existing zip component b) 'zipfile' i

camel pull request: CAMEL-6064: updated Wire Tap onPrepare to process new E...

2013-02-12 Thread scranton
Github user scranton closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/12

Re: About 4 method signatures by the ClassResolver API

2013-02-12 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > Hi > > Looking at the public ClassResolver API (among others) it provides 4 methods > taking over the concrete to be loaded Class type: > > http://camel.apache.org/maven/current/camel-core/apidocs/org/apache/camel/spi/ClassResolver.html#resolv

Re: About 4 method signatures by the ClassResolver API

2013-02-12 Thread Babak Vahdat
Thanks for your feedback Christian! Currently I'm in Holiday. Will take care of this when I'm back in town again. Babak Christian Mueller wrote > +1 > I see your point. Doesn't make sense to me too. > > Best, > Christian > > On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Babak Vahdat > < > babak.vahdat@

Re: Shared static members in components

2013-02-12 Thread Henryk Konsek
> Don't know for the moment any drawbacks. Thank you for your feedback Charles. Any further thoughts related to the discussed design approach will be appreciated :) . -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com

Re: Shared static members in components

2013-02-12 Thread Charles Moulliard
Don't know for the moment any drawbacks. On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Henryk Konsek wrote: > Hi Charles, > > > What you suggest corresponds to what we have done for "direct-vm" > component > > Yes, I'm aware that vm and vm-direct components handle static > references. I'm just wondering if

Re: Shared static members in components

2013-02-12 Thread Henryk Konsek
Hi Charles, > What you suggest corresponds to what we have done for "direct-vm" component Yes, I'm aware that vm and vm-direct components handle static references. I'm just wondering if this approach has any drawbacks or corner cases (probably OSGI-related) I'm not aware of. I don't want to reinv