camel pull request: Added @PreConsumed annotation

2013-03-28 Thread mcmonster
GitHub user mcmonster opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/18 Added @PreConsumed annotation Added @PreConsumed annotation to camel-jpa. Allows the state change caused by the record being consumed to be available further down the route. You can merge this pull

Re: 3.0 Ideas

2013-03-28 Thread Marco Westermann
Hi, I use camel for more that one year now and it is actual great for integration questions. One thing that I always mess around with is calling external web services (soap in general). And IMHO this is a central use case for soa / integration purposes. I received the impression that this cen

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

2013-03-28 Thread Willem jiang
+1 for moving to git. For the svn maven repo, I just have a quick look the artifacts, I don't think we need them any more. -- Willem Jiang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willem

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

2013-03-28 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Inline. Hadrian On 03/28/2013 09:35 AM, Daniel Kulp wrote: On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller wrote: Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-) In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can remember...). It's not clear for me righ

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

2013-03-28 Thread Daniel Kulp
On Mar 28, 2013, at 4:26 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-) > > In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can > remember...). > > It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which >

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-03-28 Thread Christian Müller
Ok, I'm on IRC now... Christian On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:09 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Ok, I'll run tests today as well, and when the trunk is ready we'll > coordinate. It would be good for you to jump on irc now and then :) > > Hadrian > > > > On 03/28/2013 08:47 AM, Christian Müller wrote:

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-03-28 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Ok, I'll run tests today as well, and when the trunk is ready we'll coordinate. It would be good for you to jump on irc now and then :) Hadrian On 03/28/2013 08:47 AM, Christian Müller wrote: It depends when the last outstanding issues are fixed. If they are not fixed today, my next time slot

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-03-28 Thread Christian Müller
It depends when the last outstanding issues are fixed. If they are not fixed today, my next time slot is Monday. It's fine for me if you or some one else do the release. In the meantime I do a "dry run" and fix some issues... Best, Christian On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Hadrian Zbarcea wrot

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-03-28 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Christian, do you want to build this release or you want me to do it? I'd also suggest doing a full build/test before the dryRun. Hadrian On 03/28/2013 05:22 AM, Christian Müller wrote: Ok, I fixed [1] and removed it from the official Apache Camel SVN and update the docs. I will commit it int

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-03-28 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Christian Müller wrote: > Ok, I fixed [1] and removed it from the official Apache Camel SVN and > update the docs. I will commit it into Camel Extra and add the docs there > in a few minutes/hours. > > We only have two outstanding issues [2]. > > I will run a "mvn

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

2013-03-28 Thread Robert Davies
sounds good On 27 Mar 2013, at 20:01, Hadrian Zbarcea wrote: > Would that something that sounds appealing to most? I think most of us > already use mostly git anyway. The ASF infra now offers the choice. > > Same question goes about camel-extra, I opened an issue there [1] and as much > as I

Re: [DISCUSS] - Moving towards Camel 2.11 release

2013-03-28 Thread Christian Müller
Ok, I fixed [1] and removed it from the official Apache Camel SVN and update the docs. I will commit it into Camel Extra and add the docs there in a few minutes/hours. We only have two outstanding issues [2]. I will run a "mvn release:prepare -DdryRun=true" to check whether I hit some issues. Do

Re: [DISCUSS] Move to a pure git based repo

2013-03-28 Thread Christian Müller
Hadrian, it looks like your timing is better than my one [1] ;-) In general, I'm +1 to switch to Git (I use git-svn at Camel since I can remember...). It's not clear for me right now what we have to do with the projects which are not located under trunk [2] - [6]. I don't think we need all of the