Github user tdiesler closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Aki,
there will be no change to the old behavior. Suppose you have the
following scenario: A SOAP client sends to a CAMEL CXF consumer and
this consumer just forwards the message to a Camel CXF provider which
calls a receiver SOAP server. If the SOAP client sends a SAP Header
then this header
GitHub user tdiesler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/570
[CAMEL-8748] DozerBeanMapper cannot instantiate DozerThreadContextClaâ¦
â¦ssLoader
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Hi Franz,
but the headers were transferred when you had the CXFPayload message
directly transferred from one end to the other, no? In other words,
that was the case when the scenario is really doing nothing at all
with the payload. But in a scenario where something between modifies
the payload
GitHub user tdiesler opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/571
[CAMEL-9026] ClassNotFoundException: kafka.serializer.StringEncoder
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-9026
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git
GitHub user dpocock opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/572
CAMEL-9021: camel-sip: change dependency to org.opentelecoms.sip /
sip-api-1.2
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/dpocock/camel
Hi,
Franz and I had an offline discussion about this and came to a
conclusion that we introduce this behavior as default from camel 2.16.
Although this change may likely introduce a regression to some CXF to
CXF Payload scenarios using WS extensions, an option to avoid this
issue such as
So maybe the camel-core can use the 2.4.0 version?
https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/parent/pom.xml#L430
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Aki Yoshida elak...@gmail.com wrote:
I am wondering if there is a way to avoid this awkward situation.
When you install camel-cxf 2.15.2 feature
Maybe try it out yourself and provide a patch to the camel extra project.
Not sure what guava version neo4j needs
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.pro wrote:
Camel-extras has
servicemix.bundles.guava-version11.0.2_2/servicemix.bundles.guava-version
and it is
The Apache Jenkins build system has built Camel.trunk.notest (build #2458)
Status: Fixed
Check console output at https://builds.apache.org/job/Camel.trunk.notest/2458/
to view the results.
10 matches
Mail list logo