Re: [DISCUSS] Extract spring-boot support

2019-12-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi For the docs/website, then I think camel-spring-boot should be similar to camel-quarkus, where Spring Boot would be listed under "projects" on the website. And for camel-quarkus we have a tool that generates the list of components, and its documentation. https://github.com/apache/camel-quarkus

Re: [DISCUSS] Extract spring-boot support

2019-12-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi The -P fastinstall does not yet work, it still runs unit tests. On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 4:27 PM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Things have progressed nicely: > * the branch https://github.com/gnodet/camel/tree/CAMEL-14226 is the > spring boot support > * the branch https://github.com/gnodet/c

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2

2019-12-18 Thread Alex Dettinger
+1 (binding) Thanks Andrea, Alex On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 3:37 PM Peter Palaga wrote: > +1 > > Thanks, > > -- Peter > > On 17/12/2019 19:49, Andrea Cosentino wrote: > > Hello all: > > > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2 > > > > This release contains new extensions, bug fi

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2

2019-12-18 Thread Peter Palaga
+1 Thanks, -- Peter On 17/12/2019 19:49, Andrea Cosentino wrote: Hello all: This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2 This release contains new extensions, bug fixes and has been updated to Quarkus 1.1.0.Final Staging repository: https://repository.apache.org/content/reposito

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Omar Al-Safi
I have already addressed most of the errors reported and some of the warnings, I will wait for the next report to be generated and look if we still need to fix. I am going to ask INFRA to enable it and test it and see its scope since I have no idea about but when I was looking at https://lgtm.com/p

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2

2019-12-18 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 19:49, Andrea Cosentino a écrit : > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2 > > This release contains new extensions, bug fixes and has been updated to > Quarkus 1.1.0.Final > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/r

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Guillaume Nodet
Le mer. 18 déc. 2019 à 09:15, Claus Ibsen a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 4:17 PM Omar Al-Safi wrote: > > > > Hello folks, > > > > Recently, I stumbled across this code analysis tool https://lgtm.com/ > and > > is free for open source integration. It looks pretty good based on the > > analys

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Omar Al-Safi
Simpler way, we can just add a badge to the readme file ( https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/adding-badges-to-project-readme-files), so from time to time we can take a look at the reports instead of having for every PR. On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:45 AM Omar Al-Safi wrote: > It looks infra allows it due t

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Omar Al-Safi
It looks infra allows it due to lgtm new integration https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17226?focusedCommentId=16864457&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16864457 On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:38 AM Luca Burgazzoli wrote: > On Wed, Dec 18, 2019

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2

2019-12-18 Thread Zoran Regvart
+1 (binding) Thanks Andrea for cutting the release :) zoran On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:49 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2 > > This release contains new extensions, bug fixes and has been updated to > Quarkus 1.1.0.Final > > S

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 9:25 AM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > Do they require access to the github repo? In that case I do believe Infra > won't allow us to use it. > > Was actually thinking about the same thing, here what they do require: https://lgtm.com/help/lgtm/github-apps-integration > Il gio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2

2019-12-18 Thread Andrea Cosentino
+1 (binding) Il giorno mar 17 dic 2019 alle ore 19:49 Andrea Cosentino ha scritto: > Hello all: > > This is a vote to release Apache Camel Quarkus 1.0.0-M2 > > This release contains new extensions, bug fixes and has been updated to > Quarkus 1.1.0.Final > > Staging repository: > https://reposito

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Andrea Cosentino
Do they require access to the github repo? In that case I do believe Infra won't allow us to use it. Il giorno mer 18 dic 2019 alle ore 09:22 Omar Al-Safi ha scritto: > That honestly I don't know about. We can give a try for one PR and see how > long it takes. If it takes some time, we just swit

Re: [HEADS UP] Git repo camel-spring-boot created

2019-12-18 Thread Zoran Regvart
Hi David, On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 6:49 PM David Jencks wrote: > My question would be more, is camel-spring-boot (conceptually) a separate > Antora component? We currently have the Spring Boot documentation reference as a part of the `components` Antora component and within the same page describ

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Omar Al-Safi
That honestly I don't know about. We can give a try for one PR and see how long it takes. If it takes some time, we just switch it off and rely on the report it generates daily. We can also configure the type of code analysis which can only limit to what we see that could help. On Wed, Dec 18, 201

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 4:17 PM Omar Al-Safi wrote: > > Hello folks, > > Recently, I stumbled across this code analysis tool https://lgtm.com/ and > is free for open source integration. It looks pretty good based on the > analysis results it gave for camel ( > https://lgtm.com/projects/g/apache/ca

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Yeah this tools seems at first sight much improved over other tools we have seen in the past, that gives a lot of false positives and noises. On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 8:55 AM Guillaume Nodet wrote: > > Agreed, we can easily create a profile for that. > In addition, we should quickly review th

Re: [DISCUESS] Integrating code analysis tool lgtm.com into the pipeline

2019-12-18 Thread Omar Al-Safi
You mean as a maven profile? If that is what you mean, sounds to me a good idea as we did for the checkstyle. However I don't think it will be possible with that tool since they do the analysis as service. Perhaps we can look for another tool that we can integrate into maven. Indeed, I will look at