Re: Proposal of a new voting process for LTS patch releases of Camel Quarkus

2025-01-10 Thread Guillaume Nodet
> > > Le ven. 10 janv. 2025 à 15:46, Peter Palaga a écrit : > Thanks everybody, for the constructive discussion. > > To sum up, there are voices expressing concerns about the viability of > the new process from the side of the ASF board. > There are suggestions to adjust the original proposal to

Re: Proposal of a new voting process for LTS patch releases of Camel Quarkus

2025-01-10 Thread Peter Palaga
Thanks everybody, for the constructive discussion. To sum up, there are voices expressing concerns about the viability of the new process from the side of the ASF board. There are suggestions to adjust the original proposal to become more in line with ASF rules (no veto votes, rename the freeze

Re: Tracing design refactoring proposal

2025-01-10 Thread Pasquale Congiusti
Thanks for reviewing! Yes, the plan is to work on a long term in order to iteratively introduce non breaking changes as long as we can. I will create a plan on Jira with the different tasks required, Most likely the first works will end up in 4.11 and probably the last bits in 4.12 (likely next LT

Re: Tracing design refactoring proposal

2025-01-10 Thread Zineb Bendhiba
+1 I like the way you structured the proposal - keep us updated on your next steps! Le ven. 10 janv. 2025 à 10:11, Claus Ibsen a écrit : > Hi > > Thanks for writing up the draft and sharing this to the group. > I had a read and I think it's a great draft and that the proposal is on the > right

Re: Tracing design refactoring proposal

2025-01-10 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Thanks for writing up the draft and sharing this to the group. I had a read and I think it's a great draft and that the proposal is on the right track. As we are closing down on 4.10 LTS by end of this month, then I think this kind of work is something aimed for 4.11 onwards leading up to the