Hi
99% of Camel users are using Java / Java8 / XML DSLs. And they are all
up to date and aligned.
We have camel-groovy with a little Camel DSL that adds a bit of
integration with groovy closures etc - but they are not really much in
use / maintained etc.
For camel-scala the DSL is overly complex
+1 from my side.
--
Andrea Cosentino
--
Apache Camel PMC Member
Apache Karaf Committer
Apache Servicemix Committer
Email: ancosen1...@yahoo.com
Twitter: @oscerd2
Github: oscerd
On Wednesday, February 22, 2017 9:51 AM, Claus Ibsen
wrote:
Hi
99% of Camel users
+1 for removing camel-scala DSL, +0.95 for removing camel-groovy DSL as well.
regards
Grzegorz Grzybek
2017-02-22 9:53 GMT+01:00 Andrea Cosentino :
> +1 from my side.
> --
> Andrea Cosentino
> --
> Apache Camel PMC Member
> Apache Karaf Committer
> Apache Servicem
+0
I would not drop for the codebase (or maybe eventually move to
camel-extra): if some people are interested to maintain and contribution
of those DSLs, they should be able to do so.
Regards
JB
On 02/22/2017 09:51 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
99% of Camel users are using Java / Java8 / XML D
+1
Best,
Christian
Am 22.02.2017 9:51 vorm. schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
> Hi
>
> 99% of Camel users are using Java / Java8 / XML DSLs. And they are all
> up to date and aligned.
>
> We have camel-groovy with a little Camel DSL that adds a bit of
> integration with groovy closures etc - but they are
+1 to move them on camel-extra
---
Luca Burgazzoli
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Christian Müller
wrote:
> +1
>
> Best,
> Christian
>
> Am 22.02.2017 9:51 vorm. schrieb "Claus Ibsen" :
>
>> Hi
>>
>> 99% of Camel users are using Java / Java8 / XML DSLs. And they are all
>> up to date and alig
+1 move to extra. The Scala DSL is overly complex and full of unexpected
traps (IMHO) but it would be a shame to remove it completely
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Luca Burgazzoli
wrote:
> +1 to move them on camel-extra
>
> ---
> Luca Burgazzoli
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Christi
imho, +1 to move to camel-extra
On Thu, 23 Feb 2017 at 12:31, Edoardo Causarano
wrote:
> +1 move to extra. The Scala DSL is overly complex and full of unexpected
> traps (IMHO) but it would be a shame to remove it completely
>
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:27 AM, Luca Burgazzoli
> wrote:
>
> >
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Groovier-DSL-td5794343.html
Cheers
Sohrab
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Deprecate-camel-scala-and-camel-groovy-DSL-tp5794234p5794368.html
Sent from the Camel Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
I logged a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10909
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 9:51 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> 99% of Camel users are using Java / Java8 / XML DSLs. And they are all
> up to date and aligned.
>
> We have camel-groovy with a little Camel DSL that adds a bit of
10 matches
Mail list logo