Re: [DISCUSS] Life expectancy for the camel-1.x branch

2009-09-15 Thread Guillaume Nodet
ch.   We > don't do minor releases often afaik and I'm not sure we really need to > make a decision about that. > > >> >> Hadrian >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Guillaume Nodet >>> Date: September 15, 2009

Re: [DISCUSS] Life expectancy for the camel-1.x branch

2009-09-15 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
AM EDT To: priv...@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Life expectancy for the camel-1.x branch Reply-To: priv...@camel.apache.org If possible, I'd like to fix the OSGi metadata for 1.6.x before doing a release. It would allow deploying camel 2.x and 1.x side by side in OSGi. Also, why is

Re: [DISCUSS] Life expectancy for the camel-1.x branch

2009-09-15 Thread Guillaume Nodet
r releases often afaik and I'm not sure we really need to make a decision about that. > > Hadrian > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Guillaume Nodet >> Date: September 15, 2009 10:33:28 AM EDT >> To: priv...@camel.apache.org >> Subject

Re: [DISCUSS] Life expectancy for the camel-1.x branch

2009-09-15 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
, 2009 10:33:28 AM EDT To: priv...@camel.apache.org Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Life expectancy for the camel-1.x branch Reply-To: priv...@camel.apache.org If possible, I'd like to fix the OSGi metadata for 1.6.x before doing a release. It would allow deploying camel 2.x and 1.x side by side in