Hi William and Willem,
thanks for both your explanations. In sum I understand the value of the
cxf component. Still it is quite confusing for users that there are so
many solutions to choose from.
I will try to understand each better and see if I can improve documentation.
As you may have see
I really don't think so. The CXF component have unique and important
features that simply cannot be replaced by other components in camel-cxf.
Camel transport is a CXF transport that can be plugged into CXF stack.
It is a building block for other components (e.g. cxfbean) and other use
case,
Here you are [1] :)
[1]examples/camel-example-cxf/src/main/java/org/apache/camel/example/cxf/CamelCxfExample.java
On 6/15/11 9:55 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
Hi Willem,
could you give a small example for creating a proxy using the cxf
component?
Thanks
Christian
Am 15.06.2011 15:47, schr
Hi Willem,
could you give a small example for creating a proxy using the cxf component?
Thanks
Christian
Am 15.06.2011 15:47, schrieb Willem Jiang:
Hi Christian,
No, I don't think you can simple replace camel-cxf component with the
camel transport for CXF.
camel-cxf component uses the cam
Hi Christian,
No, I don't think you can simple replace camel-cxf component with the
camel transport for CXF.
camel-cxf component uses the camel component way to integrate the CXF
with camel, and camel transport is using CXF transport API to integrate
the camel with CXF. You can use the camel
Hi all,
currently we have several ways of using / offering a CXF service with camel:
- Camel transport for CXF
- cxf: component
- cxfbean: component
- cxfrs: component
The camel transport is useful as it is a very thin layer compared to the
other variants. Additionally it allows to reuse exper
