[HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-01 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi As part of CAMEL-10735: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10735 We are deprecating code on 2.x that we anticipate to be removed in Camel 3.0 onwards. We have marked code as deprecated over the years, but recently got more aggressive and deprecated more in camel-core. We have also ma

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-03 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I propose to deprecate camel-guice. That module has never really been in much use / attention / maintained. And over the years guice has been pain to support / guice itself was in trouble when the leaders left and google didnt do any releases and whatnot. On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Clau

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-03 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
+1 btw, should we have a sort of "camel dormant" repository were we can put stuffs that are not actively maintained ? --- Luca Burgazzoli On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > I propose to deprecate camel-guice. That module has never really been > in much use / attention

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-04 Thread Onder SEZGIN
+1 for luca. as some commercial companies ( i know we have many in my country ) prefer to move to next version of java as they get more mature. so some apis and components may be actibely maintained with specific version but i propose to keep them as dormant maybe somebody like devs in my country

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Okay so some of the scripting languages and other languages that are EOL and has not been released in many many years are being deprecated now https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-10973 On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > As part of CAMEL-10735: https://issues.a

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 9:51 PM, Onder SEZGIN wrote: > +1 for luca. > > as some commercial companies ( i know we have many in my country ) prefer > to move to next version of java as they get more mature. so some apis and > components may be actibely maintained with specific version but i propose

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-16 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I wonder if we shall deprecate more stuff on OSGi as its one of the most problematic platforms to support. Ideally only OSGi Blueprint is the best supported we have. We should consider deprecating on OSGi - camel-scr - camel-cdi (use CDI outside OSGi like JEE, Weld/OpenWebBeans or anywhere

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-23 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
+1 --- Luca Burgazzoli On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 8:16 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > I wonder if we shall deprecate more stuff on OSGi as its one of the > most problematic platforms to support. > > Ideally only OSGi Blueprint is the best supported we have. > > We should consider deprecating on

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-23 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi There is also the old camel-servletlistener module which was intended for users on WAR files whom didnt want to use spring xml to bootstrap Camel. https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/components/camel-servletlistener/src/main/docs/servletlistener.adoc In today a modern WAR can deploy us

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-25 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi We also have the old camel-http component that uses the Http Client 3.1 that is EOL and has not been updated in many many years - in fact its from August 2007. So lets get this deprecated as well before its 10 years old ;) http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cgav%7C1%7Cg%3A%22commons-httpclient%22

Re: [HEADS UP] - Deprecate stuff on Apache Camel 2.x

2017-03-25 Thread Willem Jiang
+1 for deprecating Http Client 3.1. Willem Jiang Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (English) http://jnn.iteye.com (Chinese) Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > We also have the old camel-http component that uses th