Hi
Thanks I created a ticket about this
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19649
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 1:09 PM Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> I created the RC2 release and the tarballs got created, but they are
> now located at a different path:
>
>
> https://repository.ap
+1 for the vote
We can correct it in the final release
Il mar 25 lug 2023, 13:10 Gregor Zurowski ha
scritto:
> Hi Everyone:
>
> I created the RC2 release and the tarballs got created, but they are
> now located at a different path:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapa
Hi Everyone:
I created the RC2 release and the tarballs got created, but they are
now located at a different path:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1594/org/apache/camel/camel/4.0.0-RC2/
With previous releases, they used to be located at:
https://repository.apac
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:20 PM Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> I will restart the release then. Should I cherry-pick both commits
> (https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/10805/commits) or just 75b75809?
>
>
Yes ideally both of them.
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:16 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> >
> > On Mo
I will restart the release then. Should I cherry-pick both commits
(https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/10805/commits) or just 75b75809?
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:16 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:08 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske
> wrote:
>
> > Maybe we can rename the profile fro
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:08 PM Otavio Rodolfo Piske
wrote:
> Maybe we can rename the profile from full to "release" and remove the
> activation? So that, if we release the project using mvn -Prelease
> release... it would be active?
>
>
Yeah that seems to work
https://github.com/apache/camel/pul
Maybe we can rename the profile from full to "release" and remove the
activation? So that, if we release the project using mvn -Prelease
release... it would be active?
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 2:02 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> Okay so its very likely due to
> https://github.com/apache/camel/bla
Hi
Okay so its very likely due to
https://github.com/apache/camel/blame/main/apache-camel/pom.xml#L200
This is now in a that is skipped as part of the release build.
Before it was not in a profile and included by default.
How can we make the trigger if either
NOT -Dquickly
or
-Prelease
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:41 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote:
> Also without the tarball I guess also the website build would fail, because
> we won't have the source zip link to publish in the download table.
>
Okay I created a ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-19643
>
> Il giorno
Also without the tarball I guess also the website build would fail, because
we won't have the source zip link to publish in the download table.
Il giorno lun 24 lug 2023 alle ore 13:35 Andrea Cosentino
ha scritto:
> It's part of the release policy:
>
> https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy
It's part of the release policy:
https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#source-packages
Il giorno lun 24 lug 2023 alle ore 13:26 Gregor Zurowski <
gre...@list.zurowski.org> ha scritto:
> Is there anything by Apache that requires us to publish the source
> tarballs with the release?
>
>
Is there anything by Apache that requires us to publish the source
tarballs with the release?
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:19 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:12 PM Gregor Zurowski
> wrote:
>
> > I have prepared the RC2 release, but I have noticed that the build is
> > no longer
On Mon, Jul 24, 2023 at 1:12 PM Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> I have prepared the RC2 release, but I have noticed that the build is
> no longer creating "tarballs" of the main Camel distribution.
>
> This is the staging repository for 4.0.0-RC2:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org
I have prepared the RC2 release, but I have noticed that the build is
no longer creating "tarballs" of the main Camel distribution.
This is the staging repository for 4.0.0-RC2:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecamel-1592/
Normally, the tarballs would be located here:
h
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 9:47 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 9:44 AM Gregor Zurowski
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Claus,
>>
>> The branch is looking good, I am going to start with the release process
>> now.
>>
>>
> mvn release:prepare -Prelease -DdryRun
>
> [INFO] [ERROR] Failed to exec
On Sun, Jul 23, 2023 at 9:44 AM Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> Hi Claus,
>
> The branch is looking good, I am going to start with the release process
> now.
>
>
mvn release:prepare -Prelease -DdryRun
[INFO] [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-gpg-plugin:3.1.0:sign (default) o
Hi Claus,
The branch is looking good, I am going to start with the release process now.
Thanks,
Gregor
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 2:58 PM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> Hi Gregor
>
> The main branch is ready for cutting 4.0.0-RC2.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 8:37 PM Gregor Zurowski
> wrote:
>
> > Sound
Hi Gregor
The main branch is ready for cutting 4.0.0-RC2.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 8:37 PM Gregor Zurowski
wrote:
> Sounds good to me. I will be available for cutting RC2 by the end of
> this month. I am also available for the GA release in the first three
> weeks of August.
>
> Thanks,
> Grego
Sounds good to me. I will be available for cutting RC2 by the end of
this month. I am also available for the GA release in the first three
weeks of August.
Thanks,
Gregor
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I think it may be a good idea for us to do a RC2 before we do
+1 for me.
Thanks.
Il giorno mar 11 lug 2023 alle ore 12:17 Otavio Rodolfo Piske <
angusyo...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> all in all +1 from me. It would be good to have a period to stabilize
> things (build, tests, etc). IMHO, the idea of an RC2 fits well for this.
>
> Kind regards
>
> On
Hi,
all in all +1 from me. It would be good to have a period to stabilize
things (build, tests, etc). IMHO, the idea of an RC2 fits well for this.
Kind regards
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I think it may be a good idea for us to do a RC2 before we do the 4.0 GA
Hi
I think it may be a good idea for us to do a RC2 before we do the 4.0 GA
release.
There has been some changes to the build system of the main branch, and
many dependency upgrades (and some still to do) in both maven plugins and
for components.
All together I think it would be good to give tim
22 matches
Mail list logo
