Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-18 Thread Matt Sicker
te: > > Hi Luca, > > > > I’ve just encountered an issue when using the date function that gets > substituted by Log4j 2 and causes the exception below to be thrown. > > > > It happens in a number of situations: > > - when a route definition containing the date

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-18 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
I'll ask the log4j guys, thx for spotting this. --- Luca Burgazzoli On Thu, Aug 18, 2016 at 5:37 PM, Antonin Stefanutti wrote: > Hi Luca, > > I’ve just encountered an issue when using the date function that gets > substituted by Log4j 2 and causes the exception below to

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-18 Thread Antonin Stefanutti
Hi Luca, I’ve just encountered an issue when using the date function that gets substituted by Log4j 2 and causes the exception below to be thrown. It happens in a number of situations: - when a route definition containing the date function get logged (in DEBUG level) - when an advice is being

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-12 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
t;>>>>>> logging >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > implementation, they should not be included in normal >>>>>>>>>> component >>>>>>>>>> > > >> modules >>>>>>>>>> > > >> > > IMO. >>>>>

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-10 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
t; > >>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > The results: >>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-atmos [INFO] | +- >>>>>>>>> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >>>>>>>>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-gora [INFO] | +- >>>>

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-10 Thread Claus Ibsen
>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > Should these dependencies be removed? >>>>>>>> > > >> > > > >>>>>>>> >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-10 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
>>>>> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >>>>>>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-gora [INFO] | +- >>>>>>> > > >> > >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-09 Thread Claus Ibsen
;>> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >>>>>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-jbpm [INFO] +- >>>>>> > > >> > > > org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile* >>>>>> > > >> >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-09 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
>>> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >>>>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-jt400 [INFO] +- >>>>> > > >> > > > org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile* >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-09 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
;> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-krati [INFO] | - >>>> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >>>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-openshift [INFO] | - >>>> > >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-08 Thread Claus Ibsen
O] +- >>> > > >> > > > org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile* >>> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-scr [INFO] +- >>> > > >> log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >>> > > >> > > > *./camel

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-08 Thread Vitalii Tymchyshyn
> > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* > > > >> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-krati [INFO] | - > > > >> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* > > > >> > > >> >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-08 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
| - > > >> > > >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* > > >> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-openshift [INFO] | - > > >> > > >> > > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* > > >> > > >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-08 Thread Matt Sicker
omponents/camel-scr [INFO] +- > >> > > >> > > > org.slf4j:slf4j-log4j12:jar:1.7.21:compile* > >> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-scr [INFO] +- > >> > > >> log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* > >>

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-08 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
> >> > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* >> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spark [INFO] | | +- >> > > >> > > > log4j:apache-log4j-extras:jar:1.2.17:compile* >> > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spark-rest [INFO] | +- >> >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Matt Sicker
; > > > org.slf4j:slf4j-simple:jar:1.7.21:compile* > > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot [INFO] | | +- > > > >> > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-classic:jar:1.1.7:compile* > > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot [IN

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread James Carman
t; >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot [INFO] | | | - > > >> > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-core:jar:1.1.7:compile* > > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot [INFO] | | - > > >> > > > org.slf4j:log

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Matt Sicker
boot-starter [INFO] | | +- > >> > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-classic:jar:1.1.7:compile* > >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot-starter [INFO] | | | - > >> > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-core:jar:1.1.7:compile* > >>

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
jar:1.1.7:compile* >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot-starter [INFO] | | | - >> > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-core:jar:1.1.7:compile* >> > > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot-starter [INFO] | | - >> > > > org.

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread James Carman
ponents/camel-spring-boot-starter [INFO] | | - > > > > org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile* > > > > *./camel/components/camel-zipkin-starter [INFO] | | +- > > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-classic:jar:1.1.7:compile* > > > > *./camel/components/ca

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
ack:logback-core:jar:1.1.7:compile* >> > > *./camel/components/camel-spring-boot-starter [INFO] | | - >> > > org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile* >> > > *./camel/components/camel-zipkin-starter [INFO] | | +- >>

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Matt Sicker
[INFO] | | | - > > > ch.qos.logback:logback-core:jar:1.1.7:compile* > > > *./camel/components/camel-zipkin-starter [INFO] | | - > > > org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile* > > > *./camel/components/camel-zookeeper [INFO] | +- > > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:c

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Nicola Ferraro
gt; > *./camel/components/camel-zipkin-starter [INFO] | | - > > org.slf4j:log4j-over-slf4j:jar:1.7.21:compile* > > *./camel/components/camel-zookeeper [INFO] | +- > > log4j:log4j:jar:1.2.17:compile* > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Luca Burgazzoli >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Luca Burgazzoli > wrote: > >> Yep, I meant upgrading log4j for test only, run-time should >> definitively use slf4j-api (or maybe a custom facade) >> >> --- >> Luca Burgazzoli >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:50

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Nicola Ferraro
gt; real pain as the log4j xml file format is verbose and clunky to work > > with. > > > > Only recently they added support for .properties file but I think they > > may have changed the syntax slightly (not sure). > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22485074/lo

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j 2 ? >> > > We only use it for testing. No runtime dependency. > > > log4j v2 did not support log4j.properties file so any migration was a > real pain as the log4j xml file format is verbose and clunky to work >

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread James Carman
2:50 PM, Claus Ibsen >> wrote: >> > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Luca Burgazzoli < >> lburgazz...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> Hello, >> > >> >> > >> as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to mov

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread James Carman
t; > > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Claus Ibsen > wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Luca Burgazzoli > > > wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move t

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
e, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:50 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote: >> > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Luca Burgazzoli >> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j >> 2 ? >> >> >> &g

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Vitalii Tymchyshyn
j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j > 2 ? > >> > > > > We only use it for testing. No runtime dependency. > > > > > > log4j v2 did not support log4j.properties file so any migration was a > > real pain as the log4j xml file f

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
it make sense to move to log4j 2 ? >> > > We only use it for testing. No runtime dependency. > > > log4j v2 did not support log4j.properties file so any migration was a > real pain as the log4j xml file format is verbose and clunky to work > with. > > Only recent

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Claus Ibsen
On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Luca Burgazzoli wrote: > Hello, > > as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j 2 ? > We only use it for testing. No runtime dependency. log4j v2 did not support log4j.properties file so any migration was a real pain as t

Re: Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Andrea Cosentino
: Hello, as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j 2 ? --- Luca Burgazzoli

Log4j 2

2016-08-02 Thread Luca Burgazzoli
Hello, as log4j 1.2 is EOL since a year, would it make sense to move to log4j 2 ? --- Luca Burgazzoli