Re: Github permission

You need to fork the repository on your GitHub account. Push on your forked repository and open a Pull Request against the original repository Il lun 6 nov 2023, 17:04 Bruno Riemenschneider ha scritto: > Hi, > > I have finished my work on a small Jira ticket locally. When trying to > push my bra

Re: GitHub secret scanning

For the moment I asked for the main repo. If it's needed and not invasive we can use it on subprojects Il mar 24 ott 2023, 04:34 Colm O hEigeartaigh ha scritto: > Thanks, but shouldn't it also include > https://github.com/apache/camel-karaf ? > > Colm. > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:15 PM Andrea

Re: GitHub secret scanning

Thanks, but shouldn't it also include https://github.com/apache/camel-karaf ? Colm. On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 5:15 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > > Hello Colm, > > Just requested: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25115 > > Il giorno lun 23 ott 2023 alle ore 16:05 Colm O hEigeartaigh < > c

Re: GitHub secret scanning

Hello Colm, Just requested: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-25115 Il giorno lun 23 ott 2023 alle ore 16:05 Colm O hEigeartaigh < cohei...@apache.org> ha scritto: > Hi, > > I'd like to suggest someone on the Camel PMC file a JIRA with INFRA > along the lines of others I've filed (e.g.

Re: GitHub discussions for Apache Camel project

+1 I think it's the most suitable place as we have the code and we can make easy reference of code within the discussion. Pasquale. On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 3:43 PM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > We have talked about opening up for GH discussions at > https://github.com/apache/camel > > This allow

Re: GitHub discussions for Apache Camel project

+1 Sounds like a great idea! On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:43 PM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > We have talked about opening up for GH discussions at > https://github.com/apache/camel > > This allows more community users to more easily get involved, and ask for > help, and whatnot. > > Also for techni

Re: GitHub discussions for Apache Camel project

I also wonder how Zulip would fit into this new world. On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 7:01 PM Claudio Miranda wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:43 AM Claus Ibsen > wrote: > > > > We have talked about opening up for GH discussions at > > https://github.com/apache/camel > > It is going to be one more

Re: GitHub discussions for Apache Camel project

On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:43 AM Claus Ibsen wrote: > > We have talked about opening up for GH discussions at > https://github.com/apache/camel It is going to be one more support channel for camel, which is great for users. Which is also one more channel for contributors to look at. I would compa

Re: GitHub discussions for Apache Camel project

Thanks Claus! +1 for this. I think the moment is appropriate, as we have released Camel 4.0 and we can start using this for 4.1 discussions and beyond! On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 3:43 PM Claus Ibsen wrote: > Hi > > We have talked about opening up for GH discussions at > https://github.com/apache/

Re: [GitHub] [camel] PascalSchumacher commented on a change in pull request #5787: Fixes based on the run of the static analysis tool Findbugs

Hi Yeah lets revert this part it was a bad change. You are welcome to send a PR On Thu, Nov 4, 2021 at 10:19 AM GitBox wrote: > > > PascalSchumacher commented on a change in pull request #5787: > URL: https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/5787#discussion_r742654582 > > > > ## > File path:

Re: [GitHub] [camel-kamelets] 2020testuser commented on issue #458: Postgres db as sink

Please report also the operator log as I already said multiple times Il gio 19 ago 2021, 23:52 GitBox ha scritto: > > 2020testuser commented on issue #458: > URL: > https://github.com/apache/camel-kamelets/issues/458#issuecomment-902272983 > > >When you are back, could you please check? I'm

Re: [GitHub] [camel-kafka-connector] arickbro commented on issue #1249: vertx websocket source kafka connector configuration

Can you try with 0.10.1? Il lun 16 ago 2021, 10:42 GitBox ha scritto: > > arickbro commented on issue #1249: > URL: > https://github.com/apache/camel-kafka-connector/issues/1249#issuecomment-899332422 > > >Hi > >this inside the folder, I manage to make camel-ahc-ws-kafka-connector > and

Re: GitHub API limits hit when building camel-website locally

Hi Tada, I'm glad that helped :) zoran On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 5:24 AM Tadayoshi Sato wrote: > > Thanks Karen for your info! It's very helpful. > > And today I noticed that Zoran already updated README with a workaround > solution to the issue: > https://github.com/apache/camel-website#checks-p

Re: GitHub API limits hit when building camel-website locally

Thanks Karen for your info! It's very helpful. And today I noticed that Zoran already updated README with a workaround solution to the issue: https://github.com/apache/camel-website#checks-publishing-the-website So far the workaround seems to work fine for me. On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:20 PM Ka

Re: GitHub API limits hit when building camel-website locally

Hi Tadayoshi, I had this same issue very recently land Zoran Regvart gave me this information: Yes, this is a known limitation, GitHub removed support for providing authentication tokens via URL parameters and the HTTP calls from Hugo can't include HTTP headers (https://github.com/gohugoio/hu

Re: GitHub Actions discussion at builds@

This is very interesting Zoran! There are a few ideas we can apply to both Camel Core and Camel Kafka Connector. These may be raised on separate discussions as I feel there are pros, cons and risks to consider on each case, but overall some of the ideas are: Camel Core: - With CAMEL-16400 we've s

Re: Github action workflows troubles in all subprojects

Yes, the problem is with anything else, and we are using some of those actions like install-jdk etc. We need to ask to whitelist them or clone under apache. Il lun 28 dic 2020, 10:50 Zoran Regvart ha scritto: > On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:51 PM Andrea Cosentino > wrote: > > I'm not sure this wil

Re: Github action workflows troubles in all subprojects

On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 10:51 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > I'm not sure this will be ok in terms of the new security policy. I guess > we'll need to clone the actions anyway Actions from github/ and actions/ are whitelisted, see notice at the top of[1] zoran [1] https://infra.apache.org/github-

Re: Github action workflows troubles in all subprojects

By the way it seems the are enabling some of the organizations providing actions, so we'll need to submit a list of actions we are using probably. Il giorno dom 27 dic 2020 alle ore 22:51 Andrea Cosentino ha scritto: > I'm not sure this will be ok in terms of the new security policy. I guess > w

Re: Github action workflows troubles in all subprojects

I'm not sure this will be ok in terms of the new security policy. I guess we'll need to clone the actions anyway Il dom 27 dic 2020, 22:31 Zoran Regvart ha scritto: > Hi Cameleers, > I've found actions/github-script[1] to be useful in this, currently > trying it out on the camel-website GitHub a

Re: Github action workflows troubles in all subprojects

Hi Cameleers, I've found actions/github-script[1] to be useful in this, currently trying it out on the camel-website GitHub actions workflow. zoran [1] https://github.com/actions/github-script On Sun, Dec 27, 2020 at 6:49 PM Andrea Cosentino wrote: > > Hello, > > It looks like there is a new se

R: Re: Github Integration broken?

No problem. Glad to help. Inviato da Yahoo Mail su Android Il mer, 6 nov, 2019 alle 18:38, Pascal Schumacher ha scritto: Seem like I am missing the "linking of accounts through https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/"; step mentioned in https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache-and-github-a-fri

Re: Github Integration broken?

Seem like I am missing the "linking of accounts through https://gitbox.apache.org/setup/"; step mentioned in https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/apache-and-github-a-friendly Sorry for the noise, Pascal Am 06.11.2019 um 18:27 schrieb Andrea Cosentino: Did you follow the gitbox integration work

Re: Github Integration broken?

No idea what's wrong Il mer 6 nov 2019, 18:27 Andrea Cosentino ha scritto: > Did you follow the gitbox integration workflow? > > Il mer 6 nov 2019, 18:22 Pascal Schumacher ha > scritto: > >> Yes, the commit are no longer in the gitbox repo. >> >> I am pushing to gitbox because when I try to pus

Re: Github Integration broken?

Did you follow the gitbox integration workflow? Il mer 6 nov 2019, 18:22 Pascal Schumacher ha scritto: > Yes, the commit are no longer in the gitbox repo. > > I am pushing to gitbox because when I try to push to the camel repo on > github it tells me that I am not authorized. Even-though I am pa

Re: Github Integration broken?

Yes, the commit are no longer in the gitbox repo. I am pushing to gitbox because when I try to push to the camel repo on github it tells me that I am not authorized. Even-though I am part of  "The Apache Foundation" organization on github. Pushing to other github repos works fine. Not sure what I

Re: Github Integration broken?

It seems your commits have been lost Pascal. Not sure what happened. Can you please use the Github git repo to push? Are you using the gitbox git repo actually? Il mar 5 nov 2019, 23:23 Andrea Cosentino ha scritto: > There are troubles on GitHub today. > > You can check on GitHub status website.

Re: Github Integration broken?

There are troubles on GitHub today. You can check on GitHub status website. It's not your fault :-) Il mar 5 nov 2019, 23:19 Pascal Schumacher ha scritto: > Hi, > > guess something is broken (not sure if it was me), because when I pushed > some commits (using git push") I got error messages .

Re: [GitHub] [camel-website] Nayananga commented on issue #27: Add uninstall command for #38

Hi @Sai Purnima, Haven`t heard from you a while. If interest in contributing apache camel-website as Gsoc 2019 project, I would like to discuss with you how we can split tasks with each other. I'm interested in CAMEL-11494 , CAMEL-11503

Re: GitHub actions are available

Hi Cameleers, sorry to write about this a bit after the fact. I just wanted to provide an update and open the discussion on the use of GitHub actions. I've been experimenting on the camel-website with GitHub actions and thus far my opinion of it is that it could replace the Jenkins build for the w

Re: GitHub actions are available

Hi Willem, for the GitHub pull request builder there's asf-git account with personal access token configured. Any pipeline build needs to reference a credential and that account is not provided as a credential on Jenkins. Currently the camel-website build is configured with my own personal access t

Re: GitHub actions are available

Is there a Jenkins account that we can use in the Github? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 4:12 PM Zoran Regvart wrote: > > Hi Willem, > I don't have an action to publish the website yet, but I'm > considering/speculating about adding one. It would need

Re: GitHub actions are available

Hi Willem, I don't have an action to publish the website yet, but I'm considering/speculating about adding one. It would need to be a docker container with nodejs and yarn similar to what we use in the current Jenkins pipeline build[1][2]. The reason I'm considering/speculating is that I don't fee

Re: GitHub actions are available

It's nice to hear that. I'm quite interesting about that :) Could you share more information about how to set up the action to publish the website? Willem Jiang Twitter: willemjiang Weibo: 姜宁willem On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:32 AM Zoran Regvart wrote: > > Hi Cameleers, > seems that GitHub action

RE: [GitHub] davsclaus opened a new issue #190: Kamel CLI - Add command to run integration in Java debug mode

I did it at least 10 unsucceful time in the last 3 months From: Claus Ibsen [claus.ib...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 2:51 PM To: dev Subject: Re: [GitHub] davsclaus opened a new issue #190: Kamel CLI - Add command to run integration in

Re: [GitHub] davsclaus opened a new issue #190: Kamel CLI - Add command to run integration in Java debug mode

See here how to unsubscribe http://camel.apache.org/mailing-lists.html On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 8:31 PM Marc-André Roussil wrote: > > Can you remove me from this distribution list > > From: GitBox [g...@apache.org] > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 3:27 AM

RE: [GitHub] davsclaus opened a new issue #190: Kamel CLI - Add command to run integration in Java debug mode

Can you remove me from this distribution list From: GitBox [g...@apache.org] Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 3:27 AM To: dev@camel.apache.org Subject: [GitHub] davsclaus opened a new issue #190: Kamel CLI - Add command to run integration in Java debug mod

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request #1269: CAMEL-9570: Blueprint service proxies aren't used

Any feedback on this? > On Nov 14, 2016, at 9:41 AM, hqstevenson wrote: > > GitHub user hqstevenson opened a pull request: > >https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/1269 > >CAMEL-9570: Blueprint service proxies aren't used > >This PR has two main pieces. First, the CamelDependenc

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request #1167: CAMEL-10308

Hi Yeah that is a better name On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 6:08 PM, Vitalii Tymchyshyn wrote: > How about seThreadedAsyncMode(boolean), defailt true? > > I will also do checkstyle till EOW. > > Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn > > Чт, 15 вер. 2016 05:08 користувач Claus Ibsen пише: > >> Hi >> >> I d

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request #1167: CAMEL-10308

How about seThreadedAsyncMode(boolean), defailt true? I will also do checkstyle till EOW. Best regards, Vitalii Tymchyshyn Чт, 15 вер. 2016 05:08 користувач Claus Ibsen пише: > Hi > > I do wonder if we can come up with a better name for the setter/getter > of synchronous on ProducerTemplate. >

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request #1167: CAMEL-10308

Hi I do wonder if we can come up with a better name for the setter/getter of synchronous on ProducerTemplate. Otherwise great work. The Java 8 API makes the code easier when you can compose the futures with the thenApply. Just a note that we must/should ensure that existing Camel users can take

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request #1167: CAMEL-10308

Hi, all I've finished first draft of async support for ProducerTemplate. Please review and comment. Primary features: * All async* methods of ProducerTemplate now return CompletableFuture instead of regular Future. It makes a bridge from Camel pipelines to plain Java 8 CompletableFuture engine.

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request: Asciidoc migration and Camel CDI example doc u...

github shows adocs nicely also https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/4125e589187142287ecf9dca368ddc8b29b663f7/components/camel-cache/src/main/docs/cache.adoc On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 12:41 AM, Carl Nygard wrote: > This might be a little late on the comment, but I'm curious what asciidoc > provid

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request: Asciidoc migration and Camel CDI example doc u...

This might be a little late on the comment, but I'm curious what asciidoc provides over Markdown, considering that GitHub renders the Markdown directly when browsing? Plus Gitbook seems to provide a pretty easy method of generating PDF/epub via calibre-ebook. FWIW, Gitbook also supports asciidoc.

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request: CAMEL-7378 Adding outputType to allow user to ...

Hi, I will update the documentation as soon as somebody have a look on this PR. Thanks for your great job. Pierre-Alban DEWITTE @__pad__ Le mar. 31 mars 2015 à 22:01, padewitte a écrit : > GitHub user padewitte opened a pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/457 > > CA

Re: [GitHub] camel pull request: add support to camel-solr for List

I think I sent a similar PR. My apologies for not creating an issue first. On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:00 PM, krantiparisa wrote: > > GitHub user krantiparisa opened a pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/camel/pull/359 > > add support to camel-solr for List objects in the > body >

Re: Github account setup

Thanks for the tips guys. I also noticed a typo in my git user email, so probably that is the real cause. Cheers, On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Babak Vahdat wrote: > Hi Bilgin, > > You would first need to "star" the read-only mirror @ GitHub: > > https://github.com/apache/camel > > Then wri

Re: Github account setup

Hi Bilgin, You would first need to "star" the read-only mirror @ GitHub: https://github.com/apache/camel Then write a short mail to the GitHub support so that they can backfill your contributions calendar with your commits to Camel. This has to be done only once. Babak bibryam wrote > I'm wo

Re: Github account setup

Hi I was facing a similar issue in the past with a different project and though that it might be somehow related to the way you configured you authentication. To me it seemed, that as soon as you setup key based, machine level authenticated (which is somehow required of you do frequent commit

Re: Github

It is acceptable as issuing a pull request shows intent to contribute. However, we have no way to close pull requests after we pull them. In general, if we pull the request, we then have to send a note back to the original requester to have them close it. Not a huge deal, but an extra step.

Re: Github

Hi Jan, > Are pull requests "officially accepted" as patches? > (new Jira issue with link to the pull request?) That's right - this is accepted approach. :) -- Henryk Konsek http://henryk-konsek.blogspot.com