save half of assembling time, but it still takes about 6 minutes
to run the build in my box.
It makes me wonder how fast the box that Dan is using :)
Don't filter for line ending for source distributions
-
Key: CAMEL-4141
Assignee: Daniel Kulp
Fix For: 2.8.0
Attachments: CAMEL-4141.txt
Speed up build by not filtering the source distributions.
Discussion at:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/source-distributions-td4515150.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA
filter for line ending for source distributions
-
Key: CAMEL-4141
URL:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/C
AMEL-4141
Project: Camel
:-) , but the SSD's are probably
the bigger impact.
I wonder how fast it builds on Hadrian's machine...
Dan
Don't filter for line ending for source distributions
-
Key: CAMEL-4141
URL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4141?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Hadrian Zbarcea resolved CAMEL-4141.
Resolution: Fixed
Done
Don't filter for line ending for source distributions
strongly that we need separate windows and unix SOURCE
distributions? We can easily chop a minute or two off the assembly build if
we only have a single source distribution. Most of the time is spent doing
the scans and the line ending filtering for the two separate source
distribution assemblies.
I
+1 to speed up the assembly part. That usually seems to take too long time :)
I wonder if we need to build -javadoc JARs (if we do that) ?
Do people use them? Don't your IDE grab the javadoc from the -src JARs?
--
Claus Ibsen
-
FuseSource
Email: cib...@fusesource.com
Web:
I'm fine with this, one source archive should be enough. Like Donald said
most IDE's can handle both file types (although .zip is more common).
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to speed up the assembly part. That usually seems to take too long time
+1 for a single source disto. Though maybe we could have a zip file instead
of the tgz? Not sure if Windows can handle tgz OOTB.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Richard Kettelerij
richardkettele...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm fine with this, one source archive should be enough. Like Donald said
+1 from me as well for single source.
I also believe zip is better than tgz. This would avoid many Windows
users assuming that a Windows version of the source distro doesn't exist
imho.
Hadrian
On 06/23/2011 06:19 AM, Jon Anstey wrote:
+1 for a single source disto. Though maybe we could
+1 to a single source distro in a zip file.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me as well for single source.
I also believe zip is better than tgz. This would avoid many Windows users
assuming that a Windows version of the source distro doesn't
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Claus Ibsen claus.ib...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to speed up the assembly part. That usually seems to take too long time :)
I wonder if we need to build -javadoc JARs (if we do that) ?
Do people use them? Don't your IDE grab the javadoc from the -src JARs?
That's
Single dist +1, sounds awesome.
On Jun 23, 2011, at 7:11 AM, Eric Johnson wrote:
+1 to a single source distro in a zip file.
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea hzbar...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 from me as well for single source.
I also believe zip is better than tgz. This would
Question:
Does anyone really feel strongly that we need separate windows and unix SOURCE
distributions? We can easily chop a minute or two off the assembly build if
we only have a single source distribution. Most of the time is spent doing
the scans and the line ending filtering
+1 For one source distribution with Unix line endings
Am 22.06.2011 21:28, schrieb Daniel Kulp:
Question:
Does anyone really feel strongly that we need separate windows and unix SOURCE
distributions? We can easily chop a minute or two off the assembly build if
we only have a single source
I agree with you and I am also for a single unix-type source assembly.
saving energy and resources.
regards, aki
2011/6/22 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
Question:
Does anyone really feel strongly that we need separate windows and unix SOURCE
distributions? We can easily chop a minute
source assembly.
saving energy and resources.
regards, aki
2011/6/22 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
Question:
Does anyone really feel strongly that we need separate windows and unix
SOURCE
distributions? We can easily chop a minute or two off the assembly build if
we only have
...@apache.org:
Question:
Does anyone really feel strongly that we need separate windows and unix SOURCE
distributions? We can easily chop a minute or two off the assembly build if
we only have a single source distribution. Most of the time is spent doing
the scans and the line ending filtering
Don't filter for line ending for source distributions
-
Key: CAMEL-4141
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CAMEL-4141
Project: Camel
Issue Type: Improvement
Components
time.
It currently keeps the zip (just unfiltered). Removing the zip would save
another 15 seconds or so.
Don't filter for line ending for source distributions
-
Key: CAMEL-4141
URL: https
/22 Daniel Kulp dk...@apache.org:
Question:
Does anyone really feel strongly that we need separate windows and
unix SOURCE distributions? We can easily chop a minute or two off
the assembly build if we only have a single source distribution.
Most of the time is spent doing the scans
21 matches
Mail list logo
