Okay a bit weird it does that, as there is no instructions in the
pom.xml about that for it.
I would assume we should have
provided
For the spi-annotations in the pom.xml so its not on the transitive
list as its embedded and not needed.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Willem jiang wrote
All the tests except the ones in camel-core were failed.
We don't need to install the spi-annotations bundle as the classes are shade
into camel-core by the bnd plugin.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com
Which tests is failing? That seems odd as the .class is just added to
camel-core?
We need to find a solution as the JAR must be on the classpath. And
for OSGi its not possible as its not an OSGi bundle.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 3:01 AM, Willem jiang wrote:
> spi-annotations is already sha
spi-annotations is already shaded into camel-core by bnd plugin, we don't need
to use the shaded plugin to do this kind of job.
So I just revert the change for camel-2.12.0 release.
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://www.redhat.com
Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com
changes. But the .class files get included in
> > camel-core and available for everybody now.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Claus Ibsen > (mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I wonder if we can shade spi-an
ybody now.
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Claus Ibsen > (mailto:claus.ib...@gmail.com)> wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > I wonder if we can shade spi-annotations into the camel-core module,
> > > so its included out of the box?
> > >
e
> committing any changes. But the .class files get included in
> camel-core and available for everybody now.
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I wonder if we can shade spi-annotations into the camel-core module,
>> so its included
:
> Hi
>
> I wonder if we can shade spi-annotations into the camel-core module,
> so its included out of the box?
> As they are needed at runtime, for example by components extending
> UriEndpointComponent etc.
>
> If not we should IMHO have it as required dependency and woul
Hi
I wonder if we can shade spi-annotations into the camel-core module,
so its included out of the box?
As they are needed at runtime, for example by components extending
UriEndpointComponent etc.
If not we should IMHO have it as required dependency and would need
for it to be an OSGi bundle
own "import" functionality solved the problem for him:
>
>
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/About-the-spi-annotations-dependency-tp5736873p5737084.html
>
> And that's also what we've got on the Wiki as well:
>
> http://camel.apache.org/building.html#Building
rting the
same problem with IntelliJ. Using the maven-idea-plugin instead of
IntelliJ's own "import" functionality solved the problem for him:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/About-the-spi-annotations-dependency-tp5736873p5737084.html
And that's also what we've
ot;Camel.trunk.fulltest". See also here:
>
> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/components/pom.xml#L221
>
> Also note that the apt module by itself brings a transitive dependency to
> spi-annotations:
>
> https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/tooling/apt/p
xml#L221
Also note that the apt module by itself brings a transitive dependency to
spi-annotations:
https://github.com/apache/camel/blob/master/tooling/apt/pom.xml#L43
So I guess removing that optional flag would cause the same problems again,
see also this thread:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.
Apply this for the fix :)
diff --git a/camel-core/pom.xml b/camel-core/pom.xml
index cd2f201..7409c90 100755
--- a/camel-core/pom.xml
+++ b/camel-core/pom.xml
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@
org.apache.camel
spi-annotations
${project.version}
- true
On Fri, Aug 16
So in camel-core, the spi-annotations dependency is marked "optional" in
the pom.
org.apache.camel
spi-annotations
${project.version}
true
But is it optional? Seems to be used in some of the core components, so
should be there, right?
--
*Chris
t; check.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Sat, Aug 10, 2013 at 3:08 AM, Willem jiang <
>
> > willem.jiang@
>
> > > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> How about add the spi-annotation dep
>> >> Red Hat, Inc.
>> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
>> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
>> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com
>> (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/
>> )
>> >> (Englis
gt; Willem Jiang
> >>
> >> Red Hat, Inc.
> >> FuseSource is now part of Red Hat
> >> Web: http://www.fusesource.com | http://www.redhat.com
> >> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/
> )
> >> (English)
> >&
http://www.redhat.com
>> Blog: http://willemjiang.blogspot.com (http://willemjiang.blogspot.com/)
>> (English)
>> http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
>> Twitter: willemjiang
>> Weibo: 姜宁willem
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
st 7, 2013 at 9:01 AM, saltnlight5 wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a question on camel pom usage.
> >
> > In camel-core/pom.xml, the spi-annotations dependency is added as
> > true, however other modules such as
> camel-jms/pom.xml
> > do not include t
)
http://jnn.iteye.com (http://jnn.javaeye.com/) (Chinese)
Twitter: willemjiang
Weibo: 姜宁willem
On Wednesday, August 7, 2013 at 9:01 AM, saltnlight5 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question on camel pom usage.
>
> In camel-core/pom.xml, the spi-annotations dependency is
Proper pom.xm should let IDE automatically do that without manually adding
classpath. Either add spi-annotations to camel-core as non-optional, or
have any other modules declare it explicitly.
I think more puzzling to me is how come running maven on command line works
fine?
On Thu, Aug 8, 2013
Do you have the latest build?
I had a similar problem but a quick way to get around this is just to add the
spi-annotations.jar manually in the project classpath. And yes the UriParam
annotation is derived from that spi-annotations jar.
Thanks.
Dev.
Sent from my iPad
On 07/08/2013, at 11
Hi,
I have a question on camel pom usage.
In camel-core/pom.xml, the spi-annotations dependency is added as
true, however other modules such as camel-jms/pom.xml
do not include this dependency explicitly. Is that intentional? How does
camel-jms resolve this spi-annotations jar if it's
24 matches
Mail list logo
