private message . meanwhile please download latest
code from master and compile..
Looking fwd for your support in bench-marking
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-performance-benchmkaring-tp10902p10952.html
Sent from
ogether?
It would be nice to be part of this. Could you please guide me how I can
contribute.
Thank you
Regards
Faisal
-Original Message-
From: Liang Chen [mailto:chenliang6...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:00 AM
To: dev@carbondata.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CarbonDat
in bench-marking
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-carbondata-mailing-list-archive.1130556.n5.nabble.com/CarbonData-performance-benchmkaring-tp10902p10952.html
Sent from the Apache CarbonData Mailing List archive mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
s. Could you please guide me how I can
contribute.
Thank you
Regards
Faisal
-Original Message-
From: Liang Chen [mailto:chenliang6...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 1:00 AM
To: dev@carbondata.incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: CarbonData performance benchmkaring
Hi
1.Did you use the
Hi
1.Did you use the latest master version , or 1.0 ? suggest you use master
to test
2.Have you tested other TPC-H query which including where/filter?
3.In your case, the query is slow ? or the below "write.format" is slow ?
write.format("csv").save("hdfs://hdfsmaster/output/carbon/proj1/")
Dear all,
I am running some experiments to benchmark the performance of both Parquet
and CarbonData. I am using TPC-H lineitem table of size 8GB. It has 16
columns and I am running different projection queries where I am reading
different number of columns (3,6,9,12,15). I am facing some
