On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> Unless someone object strongly I'm probably going to be lazy and not rebuild
> the
> artifacts to reflect the correct api. My own "justification" for my
> laziness is that I
> don't want to get into the habit of releasing artifacts that h
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>> I'm +1 on either these artifacts as is, or these artifacts with thrift
>> rebuilt to reflect the correct api version
>
> Unless someone object strongly I'm probably going to be la
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> I'm +1 on either these artifacts as is, or these artifacts with thrift
> rebuilt to reflect the correct api version
Unless someone object strongly I'm probably going to be lazy and not rebuild the
artifacts to reflect the correct api. My o
I'm +1 on either these artifacts as is, or these artifacts with thrift
rebuilt to reflect the correct api version
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>> So, CASSANDRA-3491 and CASSANDRA-3492 got in the way of the first
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> If the java code wasn't rebuilt doesn't that mean whatever we tried to
> add to cassandra.thrift, isn't actually available in this build?
It looks like r1195644 is where all the actual changes took place, and
r1195646 followed that up with
If the java code wasn't rebuilt doesn't that mean whatever we tried to
add to cassandra.thrift, isn't actually available in this build?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sylvain Lebresne
> wrote:
>> So, CASSANDRA-3491 and CASSANDRA-3492 got in
Apparently the thrift version was bumped by CASSANDRA-3433 but after
the initial commit
and the code was never regenerated. Means that it's already in 1.0.2 I believe.
I guess I'll add 'regenerate the thrift bindings' before testing to my
release process.
--
Sylvain
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 2:46
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> So, CASSANDRA-3491 and CASSANDRA-3492 got in the way of the first take.
> Now that they are fixed, let's try again. I propose the following artifacts
> for release as 1.0.3.
>
> SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cass
So, CASSANDRA-3491 and CASSANDRA-3492 got in the way of the first take.
Now that they are fixed, let's try again. I propose the following artifacts
for release as 1.0.3.
SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-1.0@1202082
Artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content
+1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I know we're releasing like crazy these days, but CASSANDRA-3446 and
> CASSANDRA-3482 are pretty bad and warrant a release. And then there stuffs
> like CASSANDRA-3481 and a few other improvements that makes it even more worth
> it.
>
+1
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I know we're releasing like crazy these days, but CASSANDRA-3446 and
> CASSANDRA-3482 are pretty bad and warrant a release. And then there stuffs
> like CASSANDRA-3481 and a few other improvements that makes it even more worth
> it.
>
On 2011-11-14 13:08 , Radim Kolar wrote:
I'm not sure why hints are not working for you. You might have hit some
other issue. Some suggestions:
1. Verify that HintsColumnFamily actually contains some data with
cassandra-cli and "list HintsColumnFamily"
yes
2. Try restarting the node containing
I'm not sure why hints are not working for you. You might have hit some
other issue. Some suggestions:
1. Verify that HintsColumnFamily actually contains some data with
cassandra-cli and "list HintsColumnFamily"
yes
2. Try restarting the node containing the hints to check if that gets
your h
On 2011-11-14 10:46 , Radim Kolar wrote:
-1. fix for (CASSANDRA-3466) is included (no exception this time) but
hints are not delivered to other node:
anybody tested this? Did included fix worked for you?
Yes, I'm the one who created CASSANDRA-3466 and I can no longer
reproduce any of the issu
-1. fix for (CASSANDRA-3466) is included (no exception this time) but
hints are not delivered to other node:
anybody tested this? Did included fix worked for you?
Ah =). Searching "cassandra-dbapi2" on pypi doesn't find it, guess they don't
index the homepage links...
On Nov 12, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> http://pypi.python.org/pypi/cql/
>
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeremiah Jordan
> wrote:
>> Someone should add it to pypi
>>
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/cql/
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Jeremiah Jordan
wrote:
> Someone should add it to pypi
>
>
> On Nov 12, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
>
>> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/cassandra-dbapi2/issues/detail?id=6
>> and
>> http://code.google.c
Someone should add it to pypi
On Nov 12, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/cassandra-dbapi2/issues/detail?id=6
> and
> http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/cassandra-dbapi2/issues/detail?id=7
> will address the dependency problem ade
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/cassandra-dbapi2/issues/detail?id=6
and
http://code.google.com/a/apache-extras.org/p/cassandra-dbapi2/issues/detail?id=7
will address the dependency problem adequately for me.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Eric Evans wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 a
-1
fix for (CASSANDRA-3466) is included (no exception this time) but hints
are not delivered to other node:
INFO [GossipTasks:1] 2011-11-12 15:05:35,001 Gossiper.java (line 759)
InetAddress /**.99.40 is now dead.
WARN [pool-1-thread-1] 2011-11-12 15:06:11,514 Memtable.java (line
169) s
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Sylvain Lebresne wrote:
> I know we're releasing like crazy these days, but CASSANDRA-3446 and
> CASSANDRA-3482 are pretty bad and warrant a release. And then there stuffs
> like CASSANDRA-3481 and a few other improvements that makes it even more worth
> it.
>
> SV
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Radim Kolar wrote:
> -1 unless (CASSANDRA-3466) is included
There's this link referenced by [1] called CHANGES.txt in Sylvain's
post. Try reading it so you know what's in the release before voting.
-Brandon
-1 unless (CASSANDRA-3466) is included
I know we're releasing like crazy these days, but CASSANDRA-3446 and
CASSANDRA-3482 are pretty bad and warrant a release. And then there stuffs
like CASSANDRA-3481 and a few other improvements that makes it even more worth
it.
SVN: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/branches/cassandra-1.0@
24 matches
Mail list logo
