Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-13 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > I don't think the story here is any different than it would be for any > other project that depended on Cassandra like this, (i.e. it would be > unnecessarily difficult for them as well).  Of course it will never be > as easy as treating it all

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-13 Thread Eric Evans
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 16:47 -0700, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> What do you mean by "but not have multiple versions for 0.8 > branch"? > > I mean it would live in trunk but only in trunk -- there would be no > branches/0.8/drivers or branches/1.0/drivers. Maybe I'm missing some svn-fu here, but how

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-13 Thread Stephen Connolly
On 13 July 2011 00:47, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Rick Shaw wrote: >> >> On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Eric Evans wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 13:33 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: - the git mirror won't pick up anything under drivers/ >>> >>> Has there been a

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-12 Thread Jonathan Ellis
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 8:29 PM, Rick Shaw wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > >> On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 13:33 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >>> - the git mirror won't pick up anything under drivers/ >> >> Has there been any effort made to have INFRA add it? Aaron asked, they

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-10 Thread Stephen Connolly
if you need a hand with m-ant-t ping me and i'll try and help. also i have some simplifications on the deploy to maven central that i just haven't got around to submitting a patch for (auto-retry failed upload and deploy side artifacts at the same time... the second one will enable deploying -SNAPS

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-10 Thread Eric Evans
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 23:29 -0400, Rick Shaw wrote: > On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 13:33 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > >> - building the Java drivers is fragile and complicated, and > >> there's a lot of duplication with the "main" ant build > > > > Fr

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-09 Thread Stephen Connolly
munch munch munch... this popcorn is nice... having a hard time keeping stum... :-) - Stephen --- Sent from my Android phone, so random spelling mistakes, random nonsense words and other nonsense are a direct result of using swype to type on the screen On 10 Jul 2011 04:30, "Rick Shaw" wrote: >

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-09 Thread Rick Shaw
On Jul 7, 2011, at 10:53 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 13:33 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> - the git mirror won't pick up anything under drivers/ > > Has there been any effort made to have INFRA add it? > It was separated out to make it look/act like an independent project. Can

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-07 Thread Eric Evans
On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 13:33 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > - the git mirror won't pick up anything under drivers/ Has there been any effort made to have INFRA add it? > - building the Java drivers is fragile and complicated, and there's a > lot of duplication with the "main" ant build Fragile ho

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-07-06 Thread Jonathan Ellis
I don't think this is working out as well as hoped. - the git mirror won't pick up anything under drivers/ - building the Java drivers is fragile and complicated, and there's a lot of duplication with the "main" ant build - patches that affect both Cassandra and JDBC are cumbersome since they have

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-28 Thread aaron morton
Asked on #asfinfra and was told the only things mirrored on git are trunk / tags / branches . git-svn it is. Cheers - Aaron Morton Freelance Cassandra Developer @aaronmorton http://www.thelastpickle.com On 20 Jun 2011, at 16:28, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Maybe the non-standard

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-19 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Maybe the non-standard path is giving the git mirror fits. On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 11:26 PM, aaron morton wrote: > I can see the drivers have moved to > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/drivers/ > > Just wondering where that path is available on > git://git.apache.org/cassandra.git > >

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-19 Thread aaron morton
I can see the drivers have moved to http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/cassandra/drivers/ Just wondering where that path is available on git://git.apache.org/cassandra.git These are the remote branches I can find $ git ls-remote | grep drivers From git://git.apache.org/cassandra.git 20635cec2438

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-07 Thread Eric Evans
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 18:40 +0200, Sylvain Lebresne wrote: > On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Ellis > wrote: > > Sounds fine as far as it goes, but don't we want some concept of > > branches/tags for driver releases too? > > Our idea so far (Eric can correct me if I'm wrong :)) was to con

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-07 Thread Sylvain Lebresne
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > Sounds fine as far as it goes, but don't we want some concept of > branches/tags for driver releases too? Our idea so far (Eric can correct me if I'm wrong :)) was to consider the drivers directory as the 'trunk' for drivers, and create bran

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-07 Thread Jonathan Ellis
Sounds fine as far as it goes, but don't we want some concept of branches/tags for driver releases too? On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 3:08 AM, Eric Evans wrote: > > Sylvain and I have been discussing release issues while here at > buzzwords, and some of the issues are related to drivers.  Not > surprisi

Re: Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-07 Thread Gary Dusbabek
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 03:08, Eric Evans wrote: > > Sylvain and I have been discussing release issues while here at > buzzwords, and some of the issues are related to drivers.  Not > surprising since that's a new concept for us, and there wasn't much > thought given to the current organization. >

Reoganizing drivers

2011-06-07 Thread Eric Evans
Sylvain and I have been discussing release issues while here at buzzwords, and some of the issues are related to drivers. Not surprising since that's a new concept for us, and there wasn't much thought given to the current organization. Because the CQL drivers are independently versioned and cap