I've realised that Savva and I have been having too much conversation around
this in private and it should be brought back to the list. Here is a summary of
the great work happening behind the scenes to modernise Cayenne's ROP
implementation.
First, let's remember the problems we were having:
Very nice, thanks for the overview. Let me post that on Cayenne twitter :)
> On May 20, 2016, at 6:48 AM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> I've realised that Savva and I have been having too much conversation around
> this in private and it should be brought back to the list. Here is a summary
>
Thank you Ari for sharing this,
I want to update the conversation.
Again, protostuff people are very helpful. They've already released the new
version of protostuff (1.4.3) which contains those bug fixes. So, I've
merged cayenne-protostuff module to the trunk. And now we are going to test
it deepe
On 24/05/2016 8:21pm, Savva Kolbachev wrote:
> It seems that the next step should be moving ROP functionality to the
> separate module, as it was noted before. It will give us a cleaner
> structure.
I agree. Ideally the modules should be able to discover each other without
configuration. For exam
> On May 24, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote:
>
> I agree. Ideally the modules should be able to discover each other without
> configuration. For example if you drop in both cayenne-rop and
> cayenne-rop-proto into the project, then protostuff should automatically be
> used without
