All,
I haven't been active on this project but since merit doesn't expire I wanted
to make an observation here. While I know technically the vote passed I think
that having a -1 from one of the current core contributors should have been
given more time to discuss. Plus he did say pending now
I believe the current workflow has inhibited progress and caused tension.
Although I've been more of an observer than contributor it seems to me that
when your community is small that the emphasis should be on allowing as Chris
states for people to scratch their own itch. Additionally, I've
Just checked the RC +1 from my end. Couldn't find the original vote thread as I
think I inadvertently deleted it. If someone pokes that thread I'll +1 in
response there.
--Paul
--
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 10, 2015, at 9:39 AM, Lewis John Mcgibbney lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
+1
--Paul Ramirez
On Oct 20, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Michael Joyce jo...@apache.org
wrote:
Hi Lewis, I think the biggest hurdle for the deprecation of the stuff in
/rcmet is to
1: Make sure all of the existing code base code doesn't import from there
(I think we're already at that point, but
