Re: Review Request: Added / to the end_point of default local region. UI expects / while switching to other regions using single sign-on

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10059/#review18573 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On March 21, 2013, 11:19

Re: [PROPOSAL] EIP across zones

On 01/04/13 1:47 AM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Murali Reddy >wrote: >> On 26/03/13 8:10 PM, "Adam Grochowski" >>wrote: >> >>>Hi, >>>So I'm curious - what is the proposed method to move a single IP >>>across zones (presuming these zones span regions). As Chiradeep

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

Greetings, I am posting my first patch. I am not sure exactly how to submit a patch but I figure I will paste it here and someone will tell me the right method. I am keeping track of the work that I am doing and as Rohit suggested I will update the mailing list as I progress. This first patch adds

Re: Review Request: Cloudstack-1739

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10189/#review18572 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Abhinandan Prateek On March 29, 2013, 12:29

RE: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-779] Egress firewall rules for SRX

Thanks for the comments Chiradeep. I will update the rule name. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 4:19 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-779] Egress fire

RE: [PROPOSAL][CLOUDSTACK-768] ACL on private gateway

Thanks for the commnets. I will consider the ACL deny rules and update the FS. Thanks, Jayapal > -Original Message- > From: Chiradeep Vittal > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 3:49 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Cc: Jayapal Reddy Uradi; Abhinandan Prateek; Kishan Kavala > Subject: Re:

Re: [DOCS] Can't build Japanese docs

Hi Sebastien, Yes, I could build it w/o any problems... Could you show us your error message? On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Hiroaki Kawai wrote: > > > 2013/03/29 19:28、Sebastien Goasguen のメッセージ: > >> > >> -snip- > >>> I ended fixing it in remove-vpx.xml , the tags need to be on a > new li

RE: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

John, I was only referring to the conversation David and I had on IRC. Agreed that in this thread we should clearly define both sides for others to follow. --Alex > -Original Message- > From: John Burwell [mailto:jburw...@basho.com] > Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2013 6:01 PM > To: dev@cl

Re: [PROPOSAL] EIP across zones

On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 26/03/13 8:10 PM, "Adam Grochowski" wrote: > >>Hi, >>So I'm curious - what is the proposed method to move a single IP >>across zones (presuming these zones span regions). As Chiradeep >>mentioned earlier, /24 is the largest block that wil

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

I've been doing a rebase of my branch ever since this thread started and ended up in quite a lot of hell with merge conflicts. Perhaps I shouldn't have done it on a branch that I was doing merges with. So I want to understand the workflow of the rebase. Is it something like this: So I want to work

[ACS41][PACKAGING] Fixes from master into 4.1

Hello, I've been working on the Deb packaging today and I've committed some stuff into the 4.1 branch as well. All fixes first went into master and I did one big commit (11892d34d7ec0e37e3b5cf568a2a30d4be23590f) into 4.1 and cherry-picked some other. Since this doesn't touch any code of Cl

Re: Review Request: 4.1 deb packaging tomcat fixes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9714/#review18567 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Wido den Hollander On March 2, 2013, 11:34 p.

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

Wido, I intended my recommendation to be that the commit merged to master be squashed. Thanks, -John On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:55 AM, Wido den Hollander wrote: > Hi, > > On 03/30/2013 10:03 PM, John Burwell wrote: >> Alex, >> >> It seems appropriate to me to use both rebase and squashed commits

Re: [DISCUSS] git rebase vs git merge in your feature branch?

Hi, On 03/30/2013 10:03 PM, John Burwell wrote: Alex, It seems appropriate to me to use both rebase and squashed commits. To my way of thinking, we should rebase when syncing features branches with master (or the eventual target branch) to keep the revision history of the eventual patch as conc

[ACS41][QA] Unassigned Critical Upgrade defects

Hi, Wanted to check if anyone is interested to pick up the following upgrade defects. Once upgrade testing is done, we would get a little closer to 4.1 RC. CLOUDSTACK-1839 Upgrade 4.0 -> 4.1 - Upgraded DB has lot more keys and indexes for many tables compare to the fresh installed 4.1

Re: cloudmonkey printing enhancements proposal

Hey Justin, thanks for posting this on community ML. On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:20 AM, Justin Grudzien wrote: > My company is building a private cloud and we are moving to cloudstack. As > we begun investigating the cloudmonkey CLI we found that the output was > slightly hard to read. I have begu