Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1820 - Automation: Need to add automation for AWS Style region feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10936/ --- (Updated May 4, 2013, 4:13 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santha

Review Request: ACL on private gateway feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10942/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Kishan Kavala, and Murali Red

[PROPOSAL] VMSync improvement to better co-operate with external managers for features like HA/DRS and FT

I would like to propose an improvement effort on VMSync. This is to help build better interaction with external virtualization manager (i.e., vCenter) for features like native HA, DRS and FT. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/FS+-+VMSync+improvement Since it is a low-level

Re: Review Request: fix regions related test script to conform with library changes relating to account object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10941/ --- (Updated May 4, 2013, 1:29 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santha

Review Request: fix test scripts to conform with library changes relating to account object

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10941/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Girish Shilamkar. Descrip

Why is this mess appearing in the logs as a thread id?

I'm reading our logs and I see the following: INFO [cloud.resource.ResourceManagerImpl] (179066495@qtp-444276450-1:) Trying to add a new host at http://sim/c0/h0 in data center 1 179066495@qtp-444276450-1 is obviously the name of the thread but it is completely not useful? Does anyone know i

Re: [ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements

Taking CLOUDSTACK-129. On 5/3/13 4:28 PM, "Animesh Chaturvedi" wrote: > >The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix >version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to take >them up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move >unclaimed

[ACS42] Unassigned fearures and improvements

The following features and improvements are set to 4.2.0 for their fix version but are currently unassigned and open. If someone wants to take them up, now's the time to assign them to yourself . I will move unclaimed item to future on 5/7 Key Summary Repo

RE: dvs cheatsheet?

Much appreciated, need to pull this in :) > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 5:00 PM > To: Musayev, Ilya; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: dvs cheatsheet? > > Sure :) CLOUDSTACK-2316.. > > Ch

RE: [PROPOSAL] "Internal Load Balancing between VPC tiers"

Renamed the location. The new location is https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2.2+Internal+Load+Balancing+between+VPC+tiers, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Chandan Purushothama [mailto:chandan.purushoth...@citrix.com] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 3:35 PM T

RE: [PROPOSAL] "Internal Load Balancing between VPC tiers"

I uploaded the Test Plan to https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/2.2+Load+Balancing+on+all+Tiers . Kindly let me know if there are any review comments, Thank you, Chandan. -Original Message- From: Alena Prokharchyk [mailto:alena.prokharc...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-957: Localization -- Add UK keyboard support

> On May 3, 2013, 6:50 p.m., Fang Wang wrote: > > In file ajaxkeys.js, the original lines 32-33, and 47-49 are deleted. Those > > are needed for handling the JP keyboards. Did you replace them with other > > key combinations? just make sure it won't break the JP keyboards. > > > > Thanks. Fan

Re: [DISCUSS] Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Justin Grudzien wrote: > I will +1 this. I spoke with Cisco a few weeks ago and they certainly see > VXLANS as being the future for cloud infrastructures. In addition to Linux > support we should look at the Cisco 1000v and open vSwitch support a well. > Cisco sa

RE: [DISCUSS] Linux native VXLAN support on KVM hypervisor

Thank you all for your comment and approval! I agree with Justin's proposal. And yesterday, Open vSwitch released v1.10.0 with VXLAN support. http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/announce/2013-May/52.html I've created Jira ticket and start writing design doc. https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-1820 - Automation: Need to add automation for AWS Style region feature

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10936/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Prasanna Santhanam and Girish Shilamkar. Descrip

Re: Review Request: Remove filterwin2k from virtual router default config

Make sure you put in a request for it to be pulled into 4.1 (for CLOUDSTACK-282), or provide a second patch if it doesn't cherry-pick cleanly out of master! On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 3:05 PM, Dennis Lawler wrote: > > --- > This is an automati

Re: Review Request: Remove filterwin2k from virtual router default config

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/ --- (Updated May 3, 2013, 9:05 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Frank Zhang.

RE: dvs cheatsheet?

Sure :) CLOUDSTACK-2316.. Cheers! Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 1:55 PM To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: dvs cheatsheet? Do you mind sharing what bug he fixed? :) > -Ori

RE: New committer: Phong Nguyen

Congrats Phong :) +1 committer for NYC. > -Original Message- > From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 4:37 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: New committer: Phong Nguyen > > Excellent news Phong, congratulations! > > > On Fri, May 3,

RE: dvs cheatsheet?

Do you mind sharing what bug he fixed? :) > -Original Message- > From: Vijayendra Bhamidipati [mailto:vijayendra.bhamidip...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 4:09 PM > To: Musayev, Ilya; dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: dvs cheatsheet? > > Thanks for the pointers Ilya! I

Re: New committer: Phong Nguyen

Excellent news Phong, congratulations! On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:10 PM, David Nalley wrote: > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked > Phong Nguyen to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that > they have accepted. > > Being a committer allows many c

Re: Review Request: Remove filterwin2k from virtual router default config

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/#review20143 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chiradeep Vittal On May 1, 2013, 4:47 p.m.,

RE: dvs cheatsheet?

Thanks for the pointers Ilya! I was running into a bug that Sateesh fixed and I was able to deploy the vds.. Cheers! Regards, Vijay -Original Message- From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusa...@webmd.net] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2013 4:30 PM To: Vijayendra Bhamidipati; dev@cloudstack.apache.

Re: Pending reviews

10884 - Sorry, I thought maybe you had commit access. I'll do it now. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Dennis Lawler wrote: > Still pending review: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/ > > Should to good to commit. Any takers? :) > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/ >

Pending reviews

Still pending review: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10843/ Should to good to commit. Any takers? :) https://reviews.apache.org/r/10884/

Re: [jira] [Commented] (CLOUDSTACK-528) Failed to create secondary storage

He is on vacation for the next week. On May 3, 2013, at 2:28 PM, "edison su (JIRA)" wrote: > >[ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13648651#comment-13648651 > ] > > edison su commente

Re: Review Request: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2146: scaling up system vm failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10914/#review20142 --- Commit 38b4f84f1749f86ac058b25d86995fe54bc7fde6 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-1849 [AWS Style Health Checks] Creation of LB Health Check policy fails if the value of "Unhealthy Threshold" parameter is 3 or more.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10570/#review20141 --- Commit c8e3fff6e43954bdd0c33aabcd0c17fa3799c4f3 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) fix upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 for systemvm changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10904/#review20140 --- Commit a3a5c13427d6871f87da291425314b18ef64fa2a in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 - part2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10913/#review20139 --- Commit a3a5c13427d6871f87da291425314b18ef64fa2a in branch refs/heads

Re: [GSOC] deadline today

Didn't recognize what GSOC was. :) On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Oh - sorry for the confusion there - just wanted to make sure I wasn't > missing out on anything for 4.2. :) > > Thanks, Chip! > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers > wrote: > >> Mike, >> >

Re: [GSOC] deadline today

Oh - sorry for the confusion there - just wanted to make sure I wasn't missing out on anything for 4.2. :) Thanks, Chip! On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 1:17 PM, Chip Childers wrote: > Mike, > > This is for google summer of code. > > On May 3, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [GSOC] deadline today

Mike, This is for google summer of code. On May 3, 2013, at 2:45 PM, Mike Tutkowski wrote: > Hi, > > I'm working on a storage plug-in (and helping Edison where need be in the > storage framework). > > Do I need any proposal submitted? > > Thanks! > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shiva Tej

New committer: Phong Nguyen

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack has asked Phong Nguyen to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that they have accepted. Being a committer allows many contributors to contribute more autonomously. For developers, it makes it easier to submit changes and eli

Re: [DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?

That sounds great, Animesh. Thank you! On 3 May 2013 19:59, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Yes I will merge primary and secondary maintainers into one column. I also > started a separate thread yesterday on JIRA component based filters and > email subscriptions so that whoever is interested can be

RE: [DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?

Yes I will merge primary and secondary maintainers into one column. I also started a separate thread yesterday on JIRA component based filters and email subscriptions so that whoever is interested can be notified on potential opportunities to work on. When you get a chance please review and pr

DB-access question

Hi, I'm learning some of the basics regarding how we access our DB in CS. I was wondering if someone might be able to point me to related sample code. I have a Zone ID (the key in its table) and I'd like to read up the specified row so I can get its UUID. Thanks! -- *Mike Tutkowski* *Senior C

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-957: Localization -- Add UK keyboard support

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10836/#review20130 --- In file ajaxkeys.js, the original lines 32-33, and 47-49 are deleted

Re: [GSOC] deadline today

Hi, I'm working on a storage plug-in (and helping Edison where need be in the storage framework). Do I need any proposal submitted? Thanks! On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Shiva Teja wrote: > Any last minute reviews on > https://gist.github.com/shivateja/f1651c21563b5dbe0f16 ? > > Thanks, >

Re: [DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?

Yep, I thought so. So can we just remove this column, and have a single column then? On 3 May 2013 19:38, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote: > Noah I had already withdrawn auto-assignment in the same thread [1] with > following comment > > [Animesh>] +1, that is the reason Apache projects do no

RE: [DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?

Noah I had already withdrawn auto-assignment in the same thread [1] with following comment [Animesh>] +1, that is the reason Apache projects do not use @author tag. I take back my original argument of auto-assigning based on maintainers list. I did a search but did not find any commun

Re: [GSoC][Proposal] Integration project to deploy and use Mesos on a CloudStack based cloud

Sebastien and Chiradeep, thanks for the comments !! That clarified a lot of things. I just read Chiradeep's blog ( http://cloudierthanthou.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/stackmate-execute-cloudformation-templates-on-cloudstack/) which details the service. I am proposing a server side implementation of c

Re: [GSOC] deadline today

Any last minute reviews on https://gist.github.com/shivateja/f1651c21563b5dbe0f16 ? Thanks, Shiva Teja. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > Remember to submit your proposals today. This is the end of the > application period. > > -Sebastien

[GSOC] deadline today

Remember to submit your proposals today. This is the end of the application period. -Sebastien

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-1638) Network plugins won't be notified VM migration.

Hi Hiroaki, Any update? --Sheng On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Sheng Yang wrote: > Hi Hiroaki, > > Any update on the patch? I am planning to use it on PVLAN VM migration > support. > > --Sheng > > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Hiroaki Kawai > wrote: > >> >> >> > On April 18, 2013, 10:

Re: OVS on KVM

Thanks Hugo, I think these two things are exactly what we need. But, I am thinking of if we need to support libvirt version below 0.10.x? I don't know how much work it would bring to get 0.9.11 ~ 0.10.x working, and I doubt fake bridge would works well enough(e.g. https://www.redhat.com/archives/l

Re: vpc loadbalanced tier

Thanks for following up with me. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Alena Prokharchyk < alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote: > I'm working on internal Lb feature. Internal Lb rules will be managed by > the dedicated system vms. For more details, see the: > > * > FS: > https://cwiki.apache.org/conf

Re: vpc loadbalanced tier

I'm working on internal Lb feature. Internal Lb rules will be managed by the dedicated system vms. For more details, see the: * FS:https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Internal+Load+Bal ancing+between+VPC+tiers * the feature is not merged to master as UI yet to be done; refer to

Re: [GSOC] LDAP User provisioning: Design document feedback

Hi, Sorry just noticed that the attachment appeared to have got stripped, here is the contents of the PDF. Alternatively I have uploaded it here: http://ianduffy.ie/Cloudstack-LDAP.pdf *Apache Cloudstack Google Summer of Code Project: LDAP user provisioning* Need to automate the way the LDAP us

RE: Guest VLAN guestion.

Correct. When you define your networks limit 500 - 500. > -Original Message- > From: Sean Truman [mailto:stru...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 12:28 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Guest VLAN guestion. > > All, > > If I want two guest networks 10.8.0.x\24 and 10.

[GSOC] LDAP User provisioning: Design document feedback

Hi, I was wondering If I could get some feedback on the attached file labeled "Cloudstack-LDAP.pdf". It outlines a design document for the project labeled "LDAP user provisioning" >From my current understanding of the single sign on mechanism implemented in cloudstack a LDAP user must be created

Re: vpc loadbalanced tier

I will look for that jira ticket and see what the status is... thanks. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: > I saw that it was pushing individual tier rules as a whole config. When I > first disabled the check, I could create two LB networks, but they'd erase > each other's h

Re: vpc loadbalanced tier

I saw that it was pushing individual tier rules as a whole config. When I first disabled the check, I could create two LB networks, but they'd erase each other's haproxy configs. Instead of modifying the java to pass different things, I modified the ssvm script to take the new config and merge it/

Re: vpc loadbalanced tier

So I've come up with a patch that seems to allow this to work. It modifies only a script in the system VM, along with disabling the check that locks down VPCs to only one load balanced network offering. It looked initially to be a bit hairy, and maybe that's why it was left off, but if there's anot

Guest VLAN guestion.

All, If I want two guest networks 10.8.0.x\24 and 10.8.1.x\24 but 0.x I want on VLAN 500 and 1.x on VLAN 600, do I just put start VLAN 500 and end VLAN 500 and start VLAN 600 and end VLAN 600 when configuring them? v/r Sean

Re: vpc loadbalanced tier

Marcus, the limitation exists only on the VPC Virtual Router side. All LB rules are stored in the single haProxy config, and haproxy restarts on any of the single rule change. If we support public LB on multiple tiers, the changes to the tier1 rule would affect rules of the tier2 as well (rules wil

RE: OVS on KVM

Hey Sheng, Thanks for testing! I must admit I didn't test thoroughly with vlan as most of my networks are Nicira based. I've done some research and I can fix it by using fake bridges (in openvswitch) when libvirt is too old. That requires some modifications to the plug routines, but nothing th

Re: [ACS41][DISCUSS] Options for us to deal with the 2.x to 4.x

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:33:11PM +0800, Wei ZHOU wrote: > I am working on 2319 and 2322. Hope to resolve them Monday. > Wei - thank you for all of the work you have been doing!

Re: [DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?

On Fri, May 3, 2013, at 08:03 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > I understand the motivation behind this, but I believe the outcome of > that > thread was a consensus that auto-assignment does not happen in any other > Apache projects, and should not happen here either. (So no need for this > "primary mainta

Re: [ACS41][DISCUSS] Options for us to deal with the 2.x to 4.x

And actually, for option 2 I think it's worse than I said. I'd argue that these issues are probably blocking upgrades to the 3.x line anyway. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > upgrade problems > Reply-To: > > OK - So we are being inundated with 2.x to 4.1 upgrade problems.

Re: [ACS41][DISCUSS] Options for us to deal with the 2.x to 4.x

I am working on 2319 and 2322. Hope to resolve them Monday.

[ACS41][DISCUSS] Options for us to deal with the 2.x to 4.x

upgrade problems Reply-To: OK - So we are being inundated with 2.x to 4.1 upgrade problems. I see two options: 1) Someone(s) step up to fully test this upgrade path, and resolve issues that are known (plus those that are found while testing). We would wait to release 4.1 until this is all set.

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 - part2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10913/#review20122 --- Ship it! Ship It! - Chip Childers On May 3, 2013, 6:51 a.m., Wei

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) fix upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 for systemvm changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10904/#review20121 --- Commit a3a5c13427d6871f87da291425314b18ef64fa2a in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 - part2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10913/#review20120 --- Commit a3a5c13427d6871f87da291425314b18ef64fa2a in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 - part2

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10913/#review20119 --- Commit 4dbeefcc0d9d637d039f61f587f9581bdc88595b in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: (CLOUDSTACK-2303) fix upgrade failed from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 for systemvm changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10904/#review20118 --- Commit 4dbeefcc0d9d637d039f61f587f9581bdc88595b in branch refs/heads

Re: [ACS41][FYI] CLOUDSTACK-2044 would affect 4.1

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 07:45:13AM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote: > I suppose so. BTW, you would need: > > commit 8832a529fc8fec96f00e201b80fe1f09b587da15 > Author: Sheng Yang > Date: Thu May 2 22:12:31 2013 -0700 > > Fix rat > > exclude dnsmasq.conf.tmpl > > As well. thanks - applied bot

[ACS41] CLOUDSTACK-528 affects VMware users upgrading from 2.x to 4.x. Help needed please.

CLOUDSTACK-528 is a problem that's blocking upgrades for 2.x. Help needed from someone familiar enough with this, and perhaps with an environment to replication and retest. Interesting log lines: 2013-05-03 15:10:22,351 WARN [storage.resource.NfsSecondaryStorageResource] (TP-Processor21:null)

Re: [ACS41][FYI] CLOUDSTACK-2044 would affect 4.1

I suppose so. BTW, you would need: commit 8832a529fc8fec96f00e201b80fe1f09b587da15 Author: Sheng Yang Date: Thu May 2 22:12:31 2013 -0700 Fix rat exclude dnsmasq.conf.tmpl As well. On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 6:54 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 08:21:49PM -0700, She

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub pull request notification (Was: Re: GitHub pull requests (Was: Re: Github integration))

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 03:13:05PM +0100, Noah Slater wrote: > Okay, I believe consensus was established. > > You can track this request here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6225 > > Chip, I've been privy to lots of conversations about this issue you bring > up. Across quite a f

Re: [MERGE] CS-2163

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 04:11:21AM +, Murali Reddy wrote: > On 02/05/13 11:20 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" > wrote: > > > > > > >On 5/2/13 6:24 AM, "Chip Childers" wrote: > > > >>On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 12:40:45PM +0530, Abhinandan Prateek wrote: > >>> > >>> The tags are name-value pairs basicall

Re: [DISCUSS] Enable GitHub pull request notification (Was: Re: GitHub pull requests (Was: Re: Github integration))

Okay, I believe consensus was established. You can track this request here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6225 Chip, I've been privy to lots of conversations about this issue you bring up. Across quite a few foundation lists, it seems that the general feeling is that it should be c

Re: [ACS41][FYI] CLOUDSTACK-2044 would affect 4.1

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 08:21:49PM -0700, Sheng Yang wrote: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2044 > > The bug existed in 4.1 as well. I've already committed a fix for MASTER. > > The fix is simple. But considering the current timing(we're about to > release), and the way of repr

RE: unable to add a new VM:

Hi Marcus, They have been rebooted and were upgraded to the newer versions. root@r-4-VM:~# cat /etc/cloudstack-release Cloudstack Release 3.0 Mon Feb 6 15:10:04 PST 2012 Cheers, Shashi -Original Message- From: Wei ZHOU [mailto:ustcweiz...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 3 May, 2013 3:00 PM

[DISCUSS] Primary maintainers?

Hi folks, While reading the meeting minutes, I found a link to: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Current+Maintainers+Per+Component I feel concerned about the distinction between "primary maintainer" and "secondary maintainer". I believe this could discourage contribution. S

Re: unable to add a new VM:

The vmMac and vmIpaddress are null in DhcpEntryCommand. 2013/5/3 Marcus Sorensen > Was the system VM rebooted to get new software? > On May 3, 2013 4:57 AM, "Shashi Dahal" wrote: > > > Hi All, > > Sending to both lists, as not sure if this is a dev or infra issue. > > > > I am not able to add

Re: [bo...@apache.org: ASF Board Report - Initial Reminder for May 2013]

LGTM On 1 May 2013 20:28, Chip Childers wrote: > It's report time for us again (we are on a monthly schedule for our > first quarter as a TLP). > > I'll provide a draft in the next couple of days, and kindly ask that > others review / edit it prior to submission... unless someone beats me > to

Re: unable to add a new VM:

Was the system VM rebooted to get new software? On May 3, 2013 4:57 AM, "Shashi Dahal" wrote: > Hi All, > Sending to both lists, as not sure if this is a dev or infra issue. > > I am not able to add a new VM after upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 [CentOS > 6.4 - Advance Networking with Security Grou

Re: Review Request: fix test scripts to conform with library changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10915/ --- (Updated May 3, 2013, 12:21 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Sa

Review Request: fix test scripts to conform with library changes

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10915/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Prasanna Santhanam. Description --- Modi

RE: 4.1 Build Stalls

Prasana, Don't know if you are still working on this but I had the problem again. Remembering you suspicion of the wireless I shut down my wireless connection and to be sure rebooted eclipse. The problem persisted with only the loopback interface having an ip-address. Running com.cloud.utils

RE: [ACS40] How to generate an event under users tab

Ilya, When user logs into the CloudStack, USER.LOGIN event gets registered and is visible to the user in "Latest events" section in the user dashboard. In ACS 4.0, we don't have API to add new event but we do support archive events and delete events in the upcoming ACS 4.2 release. --Sanjay

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-1849 [AWS Style Health Checks] Creation of LB Health Check policy fails if the value of "Unhealthy Threshold" parameter is 3 or more.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10570/#review20114 --- Ship it! Commit c8e3fff6e43954bdd0c33aabcd0c17fa3799c4f3 in branch

Re: Review Request: Fixed CLOUDSTACK-1849 [AWS Style Health Checks] Creation of LB Health Check policy fails if the value of "Unhealthy Threshold" parameter is 3 or more.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10570/#review20113 --- Commit c8e3fff6e43954bdd0c33aabcd0c17fa3799c4f3 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2188: Parsing error with Download Monitor while checking the health of downloaded templates

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10901/ --- (Updated May 3, 2013, 11:30 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh

Re: Review Request: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2146: scaling up system vm failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10914/#review20112 --- Commit 38b4f84f1749f86ac058b25d86995fe54bc7fde6 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request: CLOUDSTACK-2188: Parsing error with Download Monitor while checking the health of downloaded templates

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10901/#review20111 --- server/src/com/cloud/storage/download/DownloadMonitorImpl.java

unable to add a new VM:

Hi All, Sending to both lists, as not sure if this is a dev or infra issue. I am not able to add a new VM after upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0 [CentOS 6.4 - Advance Networking with Security Groups] Log snippet: 2013-05-03 12:41:55,212 DEBUG [agent.transport.Request] (Job-Executor-24:job-33) Seq

Re: Review Request: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2146: scaling up system vm failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10914/#review20110 --- Ship it! This is not the final fix but betterment over what was the

issue: unable to start a stopped VM after upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0

Hi All, After upgrade from 2.2.14 to 4.1.0, an existing VM that is stopped will not start again. This is due to the way the storage pool is stored in the database. This SQL query needs to be run after the upgrade, so that all old VMs can start after being stopped. update volumes set path=SUBST

RE: [ACS41] 2 bugs that need someone to look into them! - one more

Hi Guys, I just discovered a new bug. I have opened a jira ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-2319 as a blocker for 4.1.0 Summary of the issue: unable to add egress rules, outbound traffic from VMs blocked Environment: Advance Networking with Security Groups VMS that we

Re: Review Request: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2146: scaling up system vm failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10914/ --- (Updated May 3, 2013, 9:40 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan P

Review Request: fix for CLOUDSTACK-2146: scaling up system vm failed.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10914/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Abhinandan Prateek. Description --- CLOU

[ACS41] CLOUDSTACK-1907: Can't create system VM on XCP1.6 hypervisor

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-1907 Hope to raise awareness of this issue before the 4.1 release. I'm trying git 4.1 today. XenServer 6.1 works fine, but XCP 1.6 stops System VM from starting. It turns out to be a guest os type mismatch problem. The script xcp1.6-debianfix.sh wo