Re: Cloudstack 4.3 Zone not deletable

Hi, Thanks For replay, both SSVM and CPVM were in 'Stopped' state and after deleting. they were properly expunge, as expunge delay is set to 60. Regards, Tejas On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Erik Weber wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Tejas Gadaria >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I am

Re: Review Request 17847: CLOUDSTACK-5978: Changes in get_template function to make it independent of ostype passed through test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17847/#review34054 --- Commit 675414feb8d7e15bb4a3251b922a1a1d10639cb0 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 17847: CLOUDSTACK-5978: Changes in get_template function to make it independent of ostype passed through test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17847/#review34055 --- Committed to 4.3-forward and master - Girish Shilamkar On Feb. 7,

Re: Review Request 17847: CLOUDSTACK-5978: Changes in get_template function to make it independent of ostype passed through test case

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17847/#review34053 --- Commit 899ad1739359a4d851a033aa5743745199133494 in branch refs/heads

Re: Review Request 17841: CLOUDSTACK-5959: Fixed cascading failures in portable IP test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17841/#review34051 --- Ship it! Committed to 4.3-forward and master - Girish Shilamkar

Re: Review Request 17841: CLOUDSTACK-5959: Fixed cascading failures in portable IP test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17841/#review34052 --- Commit 65e1e700313b3276714e32f4943b5efd42d38d84 in branch refs/head

Re: Review Request 17841: CLOUDSTACK-5959: Fixed cascading failures in portable IP test cases

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17841/#review34050 --- Commit d44c85044566151845efc1dcc306859c3e3b1ac9 in branch refs/heads

Re: Cloudstack 4.3 Zone not deletable

On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Tejas Gadaria wrote: > Hi, > > I am not able to delete Zone. error is "The zone is not deletable because > there are virtual machines running in this zone" > but before deleting zone I have Deleted system VMs, Priamary & Secondary > Storage, Host, Pod, Cluster & di

Review Request 17889: CLOUDSTACK-4762: Enabling vGPU support for XenServer.

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17889/ --- Review request for cloudstack, Alex Huang, Devdeep Singh, and Koushik Das. Bugs

Re: Review Request 17842: fixed vmsync for hyperv

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17842/#review34047 --- plugins/hypervisors/hyperv/DotNet/ServerResource/HypervResource/Wmi

Re: Review Request 17842: fixed vmsync for hyperv

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17842/#review34046 --- plugins/hypervisors/hyperv/DotNet/ServerResource/HypervResource/Hyp

Cloudstack 4.3 Zone not deletable

Hi, I am not able to delete Zone. error is "The zone is not deletable because there are virtual machines running in this zone" but before deleting zone I have Deleted system VMs, Priamary & Secondary Storage, Host, Pod, Cluster & disabled Zone also. (not created virtual router at this point). Eve

Re: Review Request 17116: Phase1 Marvin Changes.Fix-for-CLOUDSTACK-5674, 5498, 5500( Fixed Few issues in patch 17113 )

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17116/#review34045 --- Commit 3493f17bad3b8b57778b62d464c5e7f910351cc0 in branch refs/heads

Review Request 17888: Dispatcher corrections, refactoring and tests. Corrects problems from previous attempt

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/17888/ --- Review request for cloudstack, daan Hoogland and Hugo Trippaers. Repository: cl

Re: UI Latency

I’ve been tinkering with httpd proxying the UI via mod_proxy_ajp, then using mod_deflate to compress on the httpd side. That gets me about a 2.5x decrease in loading the login screen. system.js, which is the largest item downloaded by default is around 980k, with gzip that drops to 68k. I wanna

RE: UI Latency

One of the things that I want to look in to is generating a Gruntfile so we can 'uglify' and reduce the size of css, js and image sprites. This should help reduce the initial payload and make a big difference to VPN/low b/w connections. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 36

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #262

Taken care of off-list. --David On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Laszlo Hornyak wrote: > Guys, why is jenkins asking for authentication when I want to view the > surefire reports? Unfortunately I do not have a user in this instance, so I > disabled this test for now. > > If someone could create a

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #262

Guys, why is jenkins asking for authentication when I want to view the surefire reports? Unfortunately I do not have a user in this instance, so I disabled this test for now. If someone could create a user for me, that would also solve the problem... Thank you, Laszlo On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:

Jenkins build is back to normal : build-master #264

See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #263

See -- [...truncated 2404 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:testCompile (default-testCompile) @ cloud-plugin-network-ovs --- [INFO] No sources to compile [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master #262

See Changes: [laszlo.hornyak] cleanup in LibvirtComputingResource [laszlo.hornyak] removed unused variables [laszlo.hornyak] safely close resource with java 1.7 resource block [laszlo.hornyak] replaced Integer reference comparsion w

Re: UI Latency

I could be wrong, but I believe the idea of zipping the content for the UI start page was discussed, but has not yet been implemented. As far as I know (and have experienced), every time you go to the start page, it does seem to take a while to load if you are not over a particularly fast connecti

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/#review34038 --- H Mandar, some little issues applying, but mostly: the methods for s

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/#review34037 --- Mandar, this does not apply to master. It seems note serious but the

Re: Review Request 16385: Fix for CloudStack JIRA 4406

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16385/#review34036 --- Mandar, this does not apply to master. It seems note serious but the

Re: [DISCUSS]null pointer returned from daoimpl

Chiradeep, I think you mean throwing a runtime exception or returning null is equivalent. A checked exception would enforce handling of the empty return. I think @Nullable is a good idea. In this case or in cases where there is queried for lists I would think an empty list is the best thing to do.

Re: Weird HA issue in 4.3

On 09.02.2014 18:29, Nux! wrote: On 09.02.2014 17:21, Nux! wrote: On 09.02.2014 17:04, Marcus wrote: Oh, sorry, I see you mean you turn it off outside of cloudstack. If CS checks the server and notices that a vm is no longer running, and it thought the vm was running, it should probably start

Re: Weird HA issue in 4.3

On 09.02.2014 17:21, Nux! wrote: On 09.02.2014 17:04, Marcus wrote: Oh, sorry, I see you mean you turn it off outside of cloudstack. If CS checks the server and notices that a vm is no longer running, and it thought the vm was running, it should probably start it. Yep, I stopped it by issuing

Re: Weird HA issue in 4.3

On 09.02.2014 17:04, Marcus wrote: Oh, sorry, I see you mean you turn it off outside of cloudstack. If CS checks the server and notices that a vm is no longer running, and it thought the vm was running, it should probably start it. Yep, I stopped it by issuing a poweroff via console. I'll try t

Re: Weird HA issue in 4.3

Oh, sorry, I see you mean you turn it off outside of cloudstack. If CS checks the server and notices that a vm is no longer running, and it thought the vm was running, it should probably start it. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 10:02 AM, Marcus wrote: > That IS the right thing. It would drive me crazy it

Re: Weird HA issue in 4.3

That IS the right thing. It would drive me crazy it if I manually told cloudstack the VM was supposed to be off and it kept starting it. HA makes sure a VM that is supposed to be running stays running. On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:38 AM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > I'm testing HA in 4.3 and for the most pa

UI Latency

Hello, From my understanding going to the UI at first start-up takes awhile to load due to the way it is configured, I believe I was previously told it was gzip for the website. However, I thought this would a one time thing; it seems to take quite awhile to load UI each time I visit, unlike

Re: Weird HA issue in 4.3

Last I checked that was expected behavior. --David On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:38 AM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > I'm testing HA in 4.3 and for the most part it works ok (if I kill a HV the > VMs are started on the others), however I have an issue in that when killing > a VM (powering it off from console

failing to build noredist on 4.3 RC4

Hi guys, I'm suddenly getting build failures against 4.3 - Is it looking for a jar called vim25.jar (which actually called vim25_51.jar)? [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile (default-compile) on project cloud-vmware-base: Compilation fai

Weird HA issue in 4.3

Hi, I'm testing HA in 4.3 and for the most part it works ok (if I kill a HV the VMs are started on the others), however I have an issue in that when killing a VM (powering it off from console) Cloudstack doesn't turn it back on. It marks it as "stopped" in the UI after a while, but doesn't st

Re: Move running vm to project

Hey all, sorry to bring back this topic again. But, I am curious. I was looking at the CS source code, at the method "com.cloud.vm.UserVmManagerImpl.moveVMToUser(AssignVMCmd)" I found this: if (newAccount == null || newAccount.getType() == Account.ACCOUNT_TYPE_PROJECT) {

RE: code-sprint at Schuberg Philis'

Looking forward to it - catching my flight soon. Regards Alex Hitchins D: +44 1892 523 587 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +44 7788 423 969 alex.hitch...@shapeblue.com -Original Message- From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.child...@gmail.com] Sent: 09 February 2014 00:49 To: dev@cloudstack.ap

Swift3 as S3 secondary storage to CloudStack

Hi, I configured Swift3 as S3 secondary storage to CloudStack. CS tried to download System VM templates but it failed with " Access Denied " error . Please help me to resolve this issue . =

Re: code-sprint at Schuberg Philis'

I can not join you in Netherlands, but in my free time I will work on unit tests. On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 9:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote: > H, > > We are going to have a week of close quarter code bashing starting > this monday. We will have a focus on reducing findbugs hits and > increasing unit t