See
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.4-maven-build-noredist/118/changes
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19584/
---
(Updated April 14, 2014, 7:10 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Jayapal
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20311/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20313/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20123/#review40251
---
systemvm/scripts/run.sh
Hi,
I have a Cloustack 4.2 deployment. I created a Advanced zone and there I chose
the Hypervisor type as KVM.
Later I created a cluster for XenServer hypervisor type and added a XenServer
to it. Now I want to create a VM on the
XenServer from Cloudstack UI.
I created appropriate Host Tags
Do you mean at init walk the list of sensitive classes somehow, followed
by sensitive Params and build the REGEX to be used at run time? Basically
split the existing logic into 2 parts? That sounds like a good idea. I will
need to find out how to do it but sounds doable.
Thanks,
Mandar
On Mon,
I agree that pulling the return value out into a variable and returning it at
the end can be clearer, but I wouldn't want to make an absolute rule about it.
Sometimes returning early can reduce the number of nested if/else statements
and increase clarity. For example, I would rather see:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20315/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep Singh and Rajesh Battala.
Bugs:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20316/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Girish Shilamkar and Santhosh Edukulla.
Bugs:
My bad; I was using wrong template (one that was meant for KVM)
-pradeep
From: Pradeep Cloudstack pradeepcloudst...@yahoo.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 2:43 PM
Subject: Issue with multiple hypervisor
I agree with Stephen. IDEs are smart and can highlight all the exits of a
function.
Functions which are more than a page long are more of an issue than the
multiple return statements. It is very difficult to follow such code.
~Rajani
On 14-Apr-2014, at 3:05 pm, Stephen Turner
To my mind having multiple return statements might be unclear sometimes, but
personally I do prefer this option. In this case we can easily make sure that
the return value is not going to be changed. If we know the result, let's
return it asap. If we reach a return statement anywhere, we can be
Hi,
It is all a question of good computer science. A return can easily become a
sneaky goto so, it does makes sense to avoid dotting them all over methods
because it can (and often does) indicate that the code is poorly structured.
That said, use common sense. Making code less readable or
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/cloudstack-4.3-maven-build/521/changes
Changes:
[wido] CLOUDSTACK-4665: Depend on rados-java 0.1.4
[wido] CLOUDSTACK-4665: Check if a snapshot is protected before trying to
unprotect
[wido] debian: Add JNA flag when starting agent
[wido] debian:
Well, if I remember right, what was discontinued was the XCP O.S. version
(If I can call it that way.). I remember that when we were going to install
XCP, there was the possibility to download an ISO that contained the Xen
hypervisor and XCP installed over some O.S. (Debian). We were going to use
Hello,
I run my own realhostip and today by chance I needed to download a
template from ACS 4.3, but instead of getting a link looking like
http://1-2-3-4.mydomain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 I got with just the top
domain: http://domain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 which end up in a 404.
Can anyone
Before everyone starts asking...
This:
- https://twitter.com/infrabot/status/47754934280192
And if you don't have a GPG key setup and tied to your ASF LDAP entry, this:
- https://www.apache.org/dev/infra-contact#regain-account
-chip
On Apr 11, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Madan Ganesh V madangan...@me.com wrote:
Hello there,
I’m writing nodeJS client application to interact with CloudStack.
I notice csclient and node-cloudstack modules. csclient throws API error 432
for listVirtualMachines.
Anybody has played with these
On Apr 9, 2014, at 11:41 PM, Ranjeet R rranj...@juniper.net wrote:
Hello all
The instructions to download, build from source, install and provision
OpenContrail Network offering with DevCloud is posted here.
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 03:41:44AM +, Ranjeet R wrote:
Hello all
The instructions to download, build from source, install and provision
OpenContrail Network offering with DevCloud is posted here.
Interaction happens on several layers.
Using VMware SDK, CloudStack Management Server initially talks to
vCenter over 443. However, you will also see some interaction between
Storage VM as well as Proxy VM to vCenter and ESXi hosts directly.
Are you experiencing any issues or is this for
Definitely going to be something i need to try in the near future. Thank
you..
On 4/9/14, 11:41 PM, Ranjeet R wrote:
Hello all
The instructions to download, build from source, install and provision
OpenContrail Network offering with DevCloud is posted here.
you got my drift. we could also replace the regex with a tree of flags
to search that contains flags or method names. Not sure how that
impacts performance.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Mandar Barve
mandar.ba...@sungardas.com wrote:
Do you mean at init walk the list of sensitive classes
Thanks Sebastien for the reply,
We could get started with node-cloudstack. So far so good.
We will roll out our cloud analytics beta next week. Hope the nodeJS works like
a charm with ACS.
Cheers,
Madan
www.actonmagic.com
On 14 April 2014 at 9:28:50 pm, Sebastien Goasguen (run...@gmail.com)
thank you for informations.
Exactly i would like to know what protocol vcenter uses to send reponse to
cloudstack.
Cloudstack send requests via https but reponse is it on https too?
Regards
2014-04-14 17:28 GMT+01:00 ilya musayev ilya.mailing.li...@gmail.com:
Interaction happens on several
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20154/#review40274
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Alena Prokharchyk
On April 9, 2014, 1:52
https://nodejsmodules.org/tags/cloudstack
I have not used them myself, so YMMV.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:42:02PM +0530, Madan Ganesh V wrote:
Thanks Sebastien for the reply,
We could get started with node-cloudstack. So far so good.
We will roll out our cloud analytics beta next week.
On April 14, 2014, 5:18 p.m., Alena Prokharchyk wrote:
Ship It!
Fix is committed to 4.4 and master branches.
- Alena
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20154/#review40274
Cloudstack send requests via https but reponse is it on https too?
That would be my guess, the entire interaction for vCenter should be
over 443.
On 4/14/14, 1:17 PM, Mohamed Ali Saidi wrote:
thank you for informations.
Exactly i would like to know what protocol vcenter uses to send
Your agent snippet just looks like the system trying to stop the vm.
If a vm fails to start, it will also run through the stop routine to
clean up all of the prework, so the 'failed to stop' debug is all
normal. You may need to go above and look at why it failed to start.
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at
Hi,
What is the value of secstorage.ssl.cert.domain?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 8:21 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Hello,
I run my own realhostip and today by chance I needed to download a
template from ACS 4.3, but instead of getting a link looking like
On 14.04.2014 16:21, Nux! wrote:
Hello,
I run my own realhostip and today by chance I needed to download a
template from ACS 4.3, but instead of getting a link looking like
http://1-2-3-4.mydomain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 I got with just the top
domain: http://domain.tld/blah-blah.qcow2 which end up
On 14.04.2014 18:57, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Hi,
What is the value of secstorage.ssl.cert.domain?
It's domain.tld.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
Can you change it to *.domain.tld and try?
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 10:59 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 14.04.2014 18:57, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Hi,
What is the value of secstorage.ssl.cert.domain?
It's domain.tld.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19917/#review40285
---
Ding,
sorry for the late reaction. I forgot to look at your patch
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19686/#review40286
---
Can you change the commit comment? It contains the text '... and
Hi,
Can someone pls review these changes.
Thanks Regards,
Sachin
On 4/2/14 2:14 AM, Sachchidanand Vaidya vaidy...@juniper.net wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19912/
Hi,
Can someone pls review these changes.
Thanks Regards,
Sachin
From: Sachchidanand Vaidya vaidy...@juniper.netmailto:vaidy...@juniper.net
Reply-To: Sachchidanand Vaidya
vaidy...@juniper.netmailto:vaidy...@juniper.net
Date: Tuesday, April 1, 2014 3:05 PM
To: Sachchidanand Vaidya
Hi,
Can someone pls. review these changes.
Thanks Regards,
Sachin
From: Sachchidanand Vaidya vaidy...@juniper.netmailto:vaidy...@juniper.net
Reply-To: Sachchidanand Vaidya
vaidy...@juniper.netmailto:vaidy...@juniper.net
Date: Thursday, March 27, 2014 4:38 PM
To: Sachchidanand Vaidya
On 14.04.2014 19:08, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Can you change it to *.domain.tld and try?
Thanks,
Amogh
Thanks Amogh, that did the trick!
Do not that I have the same problem with a default installation using
realhostip, it's good to be fixed.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg
Hi Daan,Here you go! Please let me know if this is not what you want...Thanks a lot for this!Ding
0002-6242.patch
Description: Binary data
On Apr 14, 2014, at 2:13 PM, daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply,
thanks Ding,
it doesn't apply, I'm afraid. Can you rebase it to latest master? Make sure
it is only one commit.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 8:48 PM, Ding Yuan y...@ece.utoronto.ca wrote:
Hi Daan,
Here you go! Please let me know if this is not what you want...
Thanks a lot for this!
Ding
On
Hi,
Is it an upgrade or a fresh 4.3 install for the other set-up you mentioned?
If it is a fresh set-up, those fields should be NULL since we default
everything to HTTP now.
Thanks,
Amogh
On 4/14/14 11:33 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 14.04.2014 19:08, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Can you change
I did a trace the other day to open the correct ports from cloudstack to
vcenter, and I found the mgmt servers and systems vm's talking to vcenter over
443 only...
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 18:17:12 +0100
Subject: Re: interactions Cloudstack Vmware
From: saidi.mohamed.ali...@gmail.com
To:
Thank you all for the help
2014-04-14 20:59 GMT+01:00 Michael Phillips mphilli7...@hotmail.com:
I did a trace the other day to open the correct ports from cloudstack to
vcenter, and I found the mgmt servers and systems vm's talking to vcenter
over 443 only...
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014
Hi All,
I came across an issue this week that I wanted to see if anyone is aware
of. Until recently we've been running on 4.2 and using the Event Bus pretty
heavily. We upgraded to 4.3 last week and I noticed since upgrading that
we're not seeing any AsyncJobEvent messages. We see all the other
Hi Daan,Sorry about that. Rebased my patch on the latest master. Attaching the patch. Please let me know if it still doesn’t work...thanks!Ding
0001-squash-6242-commits.patch
Description: Binary data
On Apr 14, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:thanks Ding,it doesn't
I was the original author for AsyncJob management and I wasn¹t aware of
that there is a hook-up to EventBus?
Kelven
On 4/14/14, 1:37 PM, David Grizzanti david.grizza...@sungardas.com
wrote:
Hi All,
I came across an issue this week that I wanted to see if anyone is aware
of. Until recently
Murali,
I have a question to you. In NetworkOrchestrator, implementNetwork code,
when we update the state for the network, why don¹t we use state machine
for Shared networks, but instead update it directly in the DB?
if (isSharedNetworkWithServices(network)) {
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20343/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description
On 14.04.2014 20:51, Amogh Vasekar wrote:
Hi,
Is it an upgrade or a fresh 4.3 install for the other set-up you
mentioned?
If it is a fresh set-up, those fields should be NULL since we default
everything to HTTP now.
It's an upgrade from some 4.3 RC..
If I wanted to disable SSL altogether,
I am curious as to how does the systemvm.iso gets pushed onto the KVM host ?
Lets say I upgrade from 4.2.1 to 4.3 and there is some ssvm agent code change,
I would expect the new systemvm.iso getting pushed from MS to the KVM host and
stop/start ssvm would have the new code into affect.
I want
Hi,
Following are the review comments on the FS:
How many regions level vpcs we can create?
Any limit on no.of tiers in each vpc(limit on no.of patch ports)?
What are the admin APIs we are going to add for trouble shooting?
How long the tunnels are active even though they are idle?
Any
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20357/
---
Review request for cloudstack.
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-5907 and CLOUDSTACK-6396
Daan,Alena,
1. The pilot patch I posted already does this of checking the command level
flag first and only for flagged commands check the list of sensitive
parameters. I was wondering if that code itself, building list of sensitive
parameters as a command can have more than one of these and then
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/19868/
---
(Updated April 15, 2014, 4:45 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20343/#review40348
---
utils/src/com/cloud/utils/servlet/CacheControlUtil.java
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/20315/
---
(Updated April 15, 2014, 5:12 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Devdeep
Ok to start with I will include it in the project and will remove it later to
new project on github
Thanks Regards
Damodar/
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, April 4, 2014 2:43 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Maven integration for
it applies,
I won't push it like this though. The comment says 'squash 6242 commits' so
i will take the liberty of changing it to something like 'CLOUDSTACK-6242:
exception handling improvements'.
Also I'd appriciate it if you upload to reviewboard next time. This make
reviewing easier for me.
61 matches
Mail list logo
