> On June 27, 2014, 5:46 a.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > I first had a chance to run this patch through a sophisticated test tonight
> > and noticed an issue with zone-wide primary storage that's based on the
> > iSCSI protocol.
> >
> > This patch leads to iSCSI storage being filtered out for
> On June 26, 2014, 11:46 p.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > I first had a chance to run this patch through a sophisticated test tonight
> > and noticed an issue with zone-wide primary storage that's based on the
> > iSCSI protocol.
> >
> > This patch leads to iSCSI storage being filtered out for
> On June 27, 2014, 5:46 a.m., Mike Tutkowski wrote:
> > I first had a chance to run this patch through a sophisticated test tonight
> > and noticed an issue with zone-wide primary storage that's based on the
> > iSCSI protocol.
> >
> > This patch leads to iSCSI storage being filtered out for
hi mike,
can you take a look at this logic, today i met an arithmetic exception(/ by
0) while creating a nfs volume.
any suggestions to calculate the maxNumberOfTries if the unavailableSrSpace
is equal to zero.
thanks
-- Forwarded message --
From: punith (JIRA)
Date: Fri, Jun 2
Hi Daan,
Could you please cherry-pick following commits to 4.4 branch.
Commit: dc22566c642e400014332045a224e5545d33a11c
CLOUDSTACK-6453: [GPU] Windows 2012 Server instance created with vGPU offering
is not coming up after installing PV drivers.
Commit: 48646ae186eb75052da3da385404a823bd785444
C
Yeah, I just looked at the Review Request:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/#review46838
It says it's for master (4.5), so I'm not sure how this ended up in 4.4 or
4.4-forward.
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Mike Tutkowski <
mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com> wrote:
> Hi Daan,
>
> Please rever
Hi Daan,
I'm not seeing this commit in 4.4.
Did I miss something?
Thanks!
Mike
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski
> wrote:
> > 9c2e6f5ed45522ff68131556028f3fb4ff91ee90
>
>
> is in
>
> --
> Daan
>
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*
Hi Daan,
Please revert commit 99dd86e588fd28dedd5fb3b830297a8a4f885760 from 4.4.
Also, please revert commit 45f0c7367680f4bfbcee470139b708d69322be78 from
4.4-forward.
These commits actually break zone-wide primary storage.
I was not aware that they ended up in 4.4 and 4.4-forward (I was thinkin
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23084/#review46839
---
Ship it!
Committed the changes in 9a27f201b02fe33cdba1dcca7da63497b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22717/#review46838
---
I first had a chance to run this patch through a sophisticated test
http://cloudstack.apache.org/docs/en-US/Apache_CloudStack/4.1.0/html/Instal
lation_Guide/management-server-install-flow.html
Section 4.5.7 has instructions on adding additional MS.
-abhi
On 26/06/14 10:55 pm, "Tejas Gadaria" wrote:
>I want to setup HA of MS with HAproxy OR Keepalived.
>
>I hav
Alex,
You are correct. It should be Integer and not Long.
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex Ough [mailto:alex.o...@sungardas.com]
> Sent: Thursday, 26 June 2014 8:09 PM
> To: Kishan Kavala
> Cc: cloudstack
> Subject: Re: Review Request 20099: Domain-Account-User Sync Up Among
> Multiple R
All,
I apologize for joining this conversation late. I understand that this patch
was submitted back in February. Around this time, my family had a significant
medical event, and I was disengaged from all work activities — missing the
original conversation.
Reading through the specification,
Yes, it's tied to networking offering. Implemented network settings follows the
network offering.
Regards,
Sateesh
> -Original Message-
> From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
> Sent: 27 June 2014 05:32
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [VMWARE][ACS430] Traffic Shaping
>
> Ilya
Ilya,
Isn't this tied into the network/service offering? (it is for other HVs,
defaults to 200 Mbps afaik)
Lucian
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "ilya musayev"
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Sent: Thursday, 26 Ju
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23098/
---
Review request for cloudstack and Mike Tutkowski.
Repository: cloudstack-git
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21817/#review46807
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jessica Wang
On May 22, 2014, 4:52 p.m., Gab
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22863/
---
(Updated June 26, 2014, 10:25 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack.
Changes
--
that would be strange. It is not a IPv6 cidr. It is IPv4.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:51 PM, Ritu Sabharwal wrote:
> Sorry for the typo in earlier mail.
>
> I gave 10.1.10.1/23 in the IPv6 CIDR field and get an error can not parse
> [10.1.10.1]. This was working with 4.3
>
> Ritu.
>
> -Origin
Sorry for the typo in earlier mail.
I gave 10.1.10.1/23 in the IPv6 CIDR field and get an error can not parse
[10.1.10.1]. This was working with 4.3
Ritu.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 2:47 PM
To: dev
Subject: Re:
PS
Don't know of a format change.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:46 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> H Ritu,
>
> Are you sure you entered 10.1.10/23? it seems to me it would have to
> be 10.1.10.0/23.
> and did you enter it in the field for IPv6? this is an ipv4 address format
>
> Daan
>
> On Thu, Jun 26,
H Ritu,
Are you sure you entered 10.1.10/23? it seems to me it would have to
be 10.1.10.0/23.
and did you enter it in the field for IPv6? this is an ipv4 address format
Daan
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Ritu Sabharwal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to create a guest network for a network off
Hi,
I am trying to create a guest network for a network offering. I am giving in
all the values and when I give IPv6 cidr value to 10.1.10/23 I get error on UI.
can not parse [10.1.1.0].
I tried this with 4.3 and it was workin. It does not work with master branch
codebase.
Please let me know
Sounds like it goes back to what I said I wish they have been involved
more actively from the start.
Thanks but really making me tired.
Alex Ough
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> I did logic review according to the FS assuming that
I did logic review according to the FS assuming that the FS (and the design
described there) was approved on the [PROPOSAL] stage, BEFORE the code was put
it to the review board. Was it approved at that stage?
Alex, the feature is not small, and considering that it raised so many
questions and
Are we enabling traffic shaping on vmware standard switches/portgroups
and if so, how do we change the behavior or turn it off complete?
Alena,
Didn't you say that you guys already "did logic review" in the previous
email?
Thanks
Alex Ough
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Alena Prokharchyk <
alena.prokharc...@citrix.com> wrote:
> Alex, sorry to hear that it took so long to get on the review process.
> The question still remains
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23084/
---
(Updated June 26, 2014, 8:49 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Mike Tutko
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23084/
---
(Updated June 26, 2014, 8:47 p.m.)
Review request for cloudstack and Mike Wang.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22019/#review46798
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Jessica Wang
On May 29, 2014, 2:16 p.m., Gab
Alex, sorry to hear that it took so long to get on the review process. The
question still remains – before you started working on implementation, and
posted your plugin’s code, was the FS approved/reviewed as a part of [PROPOSAL]
discussion? We should never start the development until you get th
For 4.3/4.4, I’m guessing this is the same solution.
For 4.5, here’s a couple of options we could implement:
1. New isolation provider (“BrocadeVLAN” or “JuniperEXVLAN”)
2. When creating the network offering, the administrator gets to select the
guru
3. New VLAN provider mechanism.
Fro
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22019/#review46776
---
Commit 5c36fe84b69441714c2577b40b42afaf8f65a1ce in cloudstack's bran
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22019/#review46775
---
Commit 6d5d48f460438c7df43e3d0e3da9bd91866c53d5 in cloudstack's bran
Alena,
It has been reduced almost twice because a lot has been separated from the
CS and moved to the plug-in not because they are 'unnecessary'. Please
remember that my initial implementation was inside the CS not as a plug-in
as I said in the previous email.
Of course, I asked and urged the rev
Vetrivel,
Mike has reviewed it.
Mike,
thanks a lot!
Jessica
From: Vetrivel Chinnasamy
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 5:07 AM
To: Mike Tutkowski; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Brian Federle; Alena Prokharchyk; Jessica Wang
Subject: RE: [ACS4.4] i18n problems in Add Primary Storage dialog
Hi Mike,
I want to setup HA of MS with HAproxy OR Keepalived.
I have MS1 & DB1 installed on 10.1.1.2 &
MS2 & DB2 installed on 10.1.1.3
also DB has master - master replication setup.
Need help on this how can i setup failover for MS.
Regards,
Tejas
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Mike Tutkowski
wrote:
> 9c2e6f5ed45522ff68131556028f3fb4ff91ee90
is in
--
Daan
Alex,
By “huge” I’ve meant that there was a lot of repetitive hardcoded things, lot
of unnecessary changes to the CS orchestration layer. If you compare a number
of changes now and originally, you can see that it reduced almost twice.
But lets discuss the complains about lack of initial review
Hi Daan,
Please cherry pick 9c2e6f5ed45522ff68131556028f3fb4ff91ee90.
This is the i18n issue I referred to yesterday that was in the Add Primary
Storage window.
Thanks!
--
*Mike Tutkowski*
*Senior CloudStack Developer, SolidFire Inc.*
e: mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
o: 303.746.7302
Advancing t
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23008/#review46755
---
Ship it!
Due to time constraints with regards to RC1 of 4.4 (tentat
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23008/#review46754
---
This line looks incorrect to me:
-
Hi Vetri,
No problem! It happens to all of us. :)
I appreciate your efforts in making these files more i18n friendly.
Thanks for fixing the issue so quickly. That helps a lot!
Talk to you later,
Mike
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Vetrivel Chinnasamy <
vetrivel.chinnas...@citrix.com> wrote:
Kishan,
The type of region id is Integer, not Long, so I'm wondering why it
should be Long.
Alex Ough
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Kishan Kavala
wrote:
>This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/20099/
>
> Alex,
> As discussed on the
Thank you David.
I put design documents on wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Bind+and+PowerDNS+integration+by+Globo+DNSAPI.
I create an issue https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6998 too.
I look forward to hearing your feedbacks.
[]'s,
Silvano Buback
On
Thanks Daan.
With completion I meant the documentation part.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:49 PM, Daan Hoogland
wrote:
> Megha, the page you mention is a collection bin for all things planned
> that are going to require a major version upgrade as they change the
> application programming interfa
+1! I’ve been slowly trying to figure out which part of the public marvin
test infrastructure we can run against our test infrastructure (and then,
later on, add our own tests to the public set…).
Having some kind of a defined set of “these tests belong with and pass
against 4.4.0 (in the citrix Q
if it is test code it will hardly interfere with the release, If it
does it is extra important to know about it early. The only reason to
not put them in the 4.4 branch is because you don't want them in the
4.4.0 release.
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Abhinandan Prateek
wrote:
>
>
> On 25/06/1
Megha, the page you mention is a collection bin for all things planned
that are going to require a major version upgrade as they change the
application programming interface.
It is not just for the IAM extensions planned.
It is completed only when 5.0 is out ;) Feel free to add to it or to
propos
Hi Mike,
Kindly accept my apology for the issue. I have used script to identify certain
pattern of hardcoded strings and fixed them. Some exceptions like this got
escaped from my unit testing also.
I have reverted the changes as suggested and created a patch for review.
Brian/Jessica, Could yo
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23009/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Santhosh Edukulla and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/23008/
---
Review request for cloudstack, Brian Federle and Jessica Wang.
Repository: clou
Hi
Is the VR started successfully?
Is the systemvms(ssvm, cpvm) have got configured successfully! Were you able to
view the console of VMs!
Share the logs why vm deployment is failing.
Am not able to see the screenshot.
Thanks
Rajesh Battala
From: huangchunmei [mailto:huangchun...@internetware.c
On 25/06/14 11:30 pm, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:58 PM, Santhosh Edukulla
> wrote:
>...
>> Team uses 4.4-forward marvin to test the changes.
>You should really not test 4.4-forward, but 4.4!
It is mainly about testing and fixing the Marvin framework.
Didn¹t want to interf
Hi,
I am a CloudStack user, below issues blocked me, would you please help to
check?
For hyper-v, systemvms are running successfully. But when creating a hyper-v
VM, could not start the virtual router as following, the Link Local IP
Address is always 0.0.0.0
Thanks,
Chunmei
[removing users@, marketing@ etc…]
On Jun 26, 2014, at 3:30 AM, Nux! wrote:
> Daan,
>
> Yup, a link will do just fine for now.
> In addition to that I'll require also the kickstart file used to build it.
> The images will have to be rebuilt regularly so we don't ship
> vulnerable/obsolete st
Hi All,
I have been following the IAM functionality work from quite sometime.
And I am interested in this work and would like to contribute in the API
changes and discussions.
If there are any design documents or any Jira tickets related to these
changes can you please point me to them that will b
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/22934/#review46728
---
Commit 7bc997f4fbaa80ed6335ba3658baaee5c9cb8e48 in cloudstack's bran
Daan,
Yup, a link will do just fine for now.
In addition to that I'll require also the kickstart file used to build it. The
images will have to be rebuilt regularly so we don't ship vulnerable/obsolete
stuff.
I'll have to write some sort of FAQ on this.
Lucian
- Original Message -
>
love it Lucian, How will the procedure for submissions look? (I'm
thinking a mail to you with a download link)
On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:18 AM, David Nalley wrote:
> This is awesome on Nux's part. I am thrilled to see this come to fruition.
>
> This is not an official CloudStack deployment. There
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:11 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
wrote:
> In response to Brocade I see your response
>
> "feature should be done (in it's branch) by 19th july. merging and fixing
> issues may take to mid august" that essentially means feature freeze (cutting
> the branch) by mid august
it
61 matches
Mail list logo
