Re: [DISCUSSION] Changes to server.xml to support tomcat7

The fact I used tocat7 is to support RHEL7 for cloudstack and RHEL7 has support for tomcat7 so started using tomcat7.. On 14-Aug-2014, at 11:50 pm, Carlos Reategui wrote: > Isn't Jetty used for testing? Why not use it for deployment too and get > rid of tomcat. > > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at

Re: Review Request 24420: vGPU Test Automation ( Check for Drivers)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24420/ --- (Updated Aug. 21, 2014, 6:25 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark an

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0

Rohit: This is a new set of artifacts. You need to cancel the existing vote and start a new one for your new set or artifacts. --David On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:45 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi guys, > > A bug was identified in newly introduce server profiles feature and the logic > of reading

Re: Review Request 24544: CLOUDSTACK-7294: Passing listall =True for listUsers api admin call

> On Aug. 13, 2014, 1:43 p.m., Santhosh Edukulla wrote: > > tools/marvin/marvin/cloudstackTestClient.py, line 348 > > > > > > Make listall as keyword argument, instead of always making it to set to > > true. > > Gaur

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #168

See

Re: Review Request 23610: New script for verifying multiple shared networks with overlapped cidrs in different vlans

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23610/#review51157 --- Ship it! Ship It! - sanjeev n On Aug. 11, 2014, 5:38 a.m., sanje

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0

Rohit, I was POCing the new release yesterday, did not notice this issue (also got side tracked and could not complete testing), but will retry tomorrow. Thanks for doing great work, CloudMonkey is life saver, Regards ilya On 8/20/14, 4:45 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: Hi guys, A bug was identifi

Re: Hotfix requests

Hi Daan, Cherry-pick or merge -ff this one too: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hotfix/4.4/6508 This pick CLOUDSTACK-6508 bug for 4.4 (already merged/fixed for master and 4.3). On 20-Aug-2014, at 12:14 pm, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi Daan, > > Sent

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Edison buddy, On 21-Aug-2014, at 1:11 am, Edison Su wrote: > If you think I am not a good PMC members, you can start a vote to kick me > out, if that's something you want. You’re taking this the wrong way, it would be immature and unprofessional to take any severe action for petty disagreement

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CloudStack CloudMonkey 5.2.0

Hi guys, A bug was identified in newly introduce server profiles feature and the logic of reading/writing config files and was fixed on 5.2 branch. I’ve pushed new artifacts, please use them for voting/testing. The updated Commit SHA is 264ddcecb1274ead2ca4879627e373ba78780117 for the same bra

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Let’s keep this civil, folks.

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

> -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 3:59 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches > > > On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:33 pm, Edison Su wrote: > > > There are s

RE: [DISCUSSION] CI

> -Original Message- > From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:20 AM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; Will Stevens > Subject: [DISCUSSION] CI > > I'd like to move this discussion out of the GIT workflow thread. > > Do we have any CI strate

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

Please do - we started tinkering with ipv6 ages ago, never got it to production, tho. On Aug 20, 2014, at 3:48 PM, Nux! wrote: > Thanks Wido for the idea, then. :-) > I'll gladly share it with you guys should I come up with something that works. > > Lucian > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadran

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:33 pm, Edison Su wrote: > There are several proposals from Citrix: > http://markmail.org/thread/c4pded5i3r22keqw > http://markmail.org/thread/xoyjw2sduenlytwm Ahem ahem, what Sebastien said. Edison, we have more expectations from PMC members :) Thanks to Citrix for donat

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

Thanks Wido for the idea, then. :-) I'll gladly share it with you guys should I come up with something that works. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Wido den Hollander" > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: We

Re: [GSOC] [CLOUDSTACK-6045] Final update

Seif did a great job. He was very dedicated. There were many times I'd send him an e-mail at what would be like 3 - 5 am his time (not expecting a response for hours) and he'd respond right away (he was actually working on the project). :) On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrot

traffic shaping not working correctly or not respecting configuration?

Hello Cloudstack Devs, It was suggested by a few people that I move this discussion from users@ to dev@ regarding an issue I'm having with traffic shaping/network throttling. First, the details: Hypervisor is Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS KVM across the board CS4.3.0 (upgraded from 4.0) Advanced networking

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

> > > > > There are several proposals from Citrix: > > > http://markmail.org/thread/c4pded5i3r22keqw > > > http://markmail.org/thread/xoyjw2sduenlytwm > > > > Edison, Citrix can't make proposals. Individuals do.. > Sorry, what I am trying to say is "from people, who happen to be employee > from Cit

RE: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality...

> -Original Message- > From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 12:25 PM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code > quality... > > On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Alex Huang > wrote: > > > Hi All, > >

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

> -Original Message- > From: Sebastien Goasguen [mailto:run...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:47 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches > > > On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > > > > > >>

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #167

See

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Sent from my Windows Phone From: Sebastien Goasguen Sent: ‎8/‎20/‎2014 1:47 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Ed

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:33 PM, Edison Su wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:17 PM >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches >> >> >> On 2

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #166

See

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

On 08/20/2014 10:07 PM, Nux! wrote: Wido, Can you share your code for this? Oh, I don't have any code. The setups I created have plain IPv6 without any security grouping. My previous e-mail was just to illustrate what would be required. Wido Cheers -- Sent from the Delta quadrant usi

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

> -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 1:17 PM > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches > > > On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:55 pm, Edison Su wrote: > > Maybe I need to

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: README: trigger for test PR

Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:55 pm, Edison Su wrote: > Maybe I need to reiterate why I reject the proposal for now, as I am the only > person vote -1(binding). > I think we all understand the pain as a release manager, even right after 4.2 > release, I asked community to think about how > We gonna fix

Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality...

Hi, On 8/20/14 12:24 PM, "Erik Weber" wrote: >They both had fundamental flaws, where the one was >practically useless for a week or so, and the other had major issues with >KVM, and if the BVT doesn't encounter those because it's using the >simulator I see it as a burden rather than a gift, sin

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

On 08/20/2014 05:46 PM, Nux! wrote: Hi, Excuse my ignorance, but doesn't this mean that clients can "steal" each other's IPv6 at will? Yes, they can indeed. Lack of IPv6 is probably my biggest complaint re basic/sg zones, but just using router adv. seems like bad security, worse than not

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

Wido, Can you share your code for this? Cheers -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

> -Original Message- > From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:42 AM > To: dev > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches > > Rohit, > > I don't see your count. At least Wido and I have voted +1 so that would be >

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Hi Daan and Sebastien, Thank you for your inputs. I did not vote as I wanted to have a positive consensus before I vote for my own proposal just to add to the counter or satisfy my ego. I understand that the gavel is with our PMC but I would still want us to try if we can meet half way, improv

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

Thanks Daniel, I’ll test this by tomorrow. Cheers. On 20-Aug-2014, at 9:21 pm, Daniel Vega Simoes wrote: > > >> On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>> Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and >>> design doc on the wiki. >>> >>>

Re: Review Request 22939: CLOUDSTACK-6460 - CLVM primary storage migration fails due to incorrect identification of source format.

> On Aug. 9, 2014, 3:15 p.m., Marcus Sorensen wrote: > > Would it be better to fix/figure out why disk.getFormat() returns QCOW2 for > > CLVM? We are manually fixing it here, but it seems that could cause other > > problems elsewhere if getFormat doesn't work for CLVM due to some enum > > else

Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality...

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Alex Huang wrote: > Hi All, > > This is something I brought up a long time ago but really didn't have the > resources to get it all up and running until now. Throughout the past > year, Edison, Prasanna, Amogh, Bharat, Koushik, Talluri, and others have > been chip

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

> On Aug. 12, 2014, 9:52 p.m., Rohit Yadav wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > > > > Thank you for your work, it looks comprehensive. Appreciate the tests and > > design doc on the wiki. > > > > Can you make sure we don't do wildcard imports, I personally don't have any > > problem with using them but a

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

On Aug 20, 2014, at 12:52 PM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > Thanks for participating. After 120 hours or 5 days, the voting result for > the proposal is as follows: > > +1 (PMC / binding) > none > > +1 (non binding) > 6 people > > 0 > none > > -1 (PMC / binding) > 1 person > > -1 (non

Re: Review Request 24611: New DNS provider (GloboDNS)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24611/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 7:18 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Chiradeep Vit

Re: [PROPOSAL] Using continuous integration to maintain our code quality...

Bumping up this thread since another one seems to be starting over CI Amogh On 5/27/14 8:28 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:52 PM, Alex Huang >wrote: >>> Like Chip, I am very concerned with this being dependent on a single >>> company, even if its the company that employs

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Rohit, I don't see your count. At least Wido and I have voted +1 so that would be +2 from the PMC. But the vote is a communitee vote. It is about techinique not process is it. If not then non binding votes are merely for information and only PMC votes are counted. In cases like these I think eith

Re: Review Request 23986: Fixed 18 Test Case failures in test_egress_fw_rules.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23986/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 6:36 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack, Doug Clark, R

[DISCUSSION] CI

I'd like to move this discussion out of the GIT workflow thread. Do we have any CI strategy in place or a starting point at least? I've never worked with marvin I from the small understanding that I have from it, it might not be the right too. I don't know. I've spend some times recently with te

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

On 20-Aug-2014, at 7:03 pm, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote: > Why not address CI and Quality standards that came up in the discussions and > get them out of the way first and then address gitflow as a second step. > Looks like majority consensus is in that direction. Now CI is available, seem > to be

Re: CloudStack UI - very slow or never loads content in large env

Ian, If i'm not mistaken, was it you who helped with graphics optimization? Thanks ilya On 8/20/14, 3:40 AM, Ian Duffy wrote: Ilya, I'm interesting in knowing if this is due to the UI or just slow responses from the API. Can you open the UI within Google Chrome and open the developer tools.

Re: CloudStack UI - very slow or never loads content in large env

It seems to be more apparent now. If i use "chrome incognito" or "safari private browsing" mode, which does not cache anything, it works just fine. If i use browser "as-is", its not really usable. At least a work around, albeit - i have to tell all end users to do this now. On 8/20/14, 3:4

RE: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Why not address CI and Quality standards that came up in the discussions and get them out of the way first and then address gitflow as a second step. Looks like majority consensus is in that direction. Now CI is available, seem to be easy to implement as proposal has been done by Alex. Looks lik

Re: [VOTE] Adapting git workflow for release branches

Hi all, Thanks for participating. After 120 hours or 5 days, the voting result for the proposal is as follows: +1 (PMC / binding) none +1 (non binding) 6 people 0 none -1 (PMC / binding) 1 person -1 (non binding) 3 people We don’t have a consensus/majority or a veto as per our bylaws; and t

Re: CloudStack UI - very slow or never loads content in large env

I have found the UI got more responsive after I did this: http://theresnomon.co/2014/improving-cloudstack-ui-performance/ I don't have that many instances though. HTH -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "ilya musayev" >

Re: IPv6 ~ Basic Network

Hi, Excuse my ignorance, but doesn't this mean that clients can "steal" each other's IPv6 at will? Lack of IPv6 is probably my biggest complaint re basic/sg zones, but just using router adv. seems like bad security, worse than not having IPv6 at all. Thoughts? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant u

RE: 4.5 RM

+1 Also each check in (defect or new feature) should be accompanied by CI based tests as unit tests ( JUNIT tests) seem to be not so popular with CS community. Discussions seem to be moving towards this. But some sort of enforcement is needed at this point. Community has tried all else for p

Re: Review Request 24892: passwd_server attempts to start but terminates with the exit code 137

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24892/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 2:25 p.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Sheng Yang

Review Request 24892: passwd_server attempts to start but terminates with the exit code 137

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24892/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Sheng Yang. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7376 https:/

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: README: trigger for test PR

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12#issuecomment-52781056 Sorry about the above one, I see I can tag people but don't see everyone in the drop down list on the cloudstack repo/project. Let me try with explicit github

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: README: trigger for test PR

Github user bhaisaab closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Re: Review Request 18433: Test Suite for Testing Remote Access VPN on VPC

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/18433/#review51097 --- Is there other patch submit for this ? then please discard this - R

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: README: trigger for test PR

GitHub user bhaisaab reopened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12 README: trigger for test PR This is a test PR You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/bhaisaab/cloudstack master Alternatively yo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: README: trigger for test PR

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12#issuecomment-52780505 Testing with Sebastien if we can use Github PR for ACS. Hey @ke4qqq can we enable tagging github users on pull requests like these? It's because we think Github PRs a

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #165

See

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: README: trigger for test PR

GitHub user bhaisaab opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/12 README: trigger for test PR This is a test PR You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/bhaisaab/cloudstack master Alternatively you

Re: 4.5 documentation for vGPU

On Aug 19, 2014, at 6:28 PM, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the process of developing feature documentation for vGPU support. > > Could someone please throw some light on how to go about, because there is no > 4.4 branch created at > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-a

[EVENT] CCCEU Poster session

Morning folks, The schedule for the CloudStack conference in Budapest Nov 19-21 has been published and looks great: http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe/program/schedule We received several inquiries about the "Global Poster Session", asking what i

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #164

See

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 Release Help

On Aug 20, 2014, at 6:01 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hey, > > See, if you want to pick the hotfixes; > > On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:21 am, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> I would love to get: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892 > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=c

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6634

Thanks pdion. ~Rajani On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote: > Thanks Seb, I've forgot to do this. > > Rajani, I've just fixed the 'new line'. all version are updated with this > new LDAP doc, there is a variable delay between git push and readthedocs > build get completed.

Re: Review Request 24646: CLOUDSTACK-7337: Volume state remains in allocated after volume creation faliure from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/#review51093 --- Ship it! master -> 8d0817860faa347eb738c28d30c98f549afb3096 - Kous

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 Release Help

We can provide some help on 4.3.1 as well on testing. Could it be possible that since 4.4.0 as been released it is not possible to execute any database change in 4.3.1 since the db script path goes from 4.3.0 to 4.4.0 ? *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect

Upgrading CloudStack without new systemvm template in place

I've filled a bug regarding CloudStack Upgrade since 4.3. when Upgrading to 4.3, 4.4.0 4.4.1 you have to create sysvm template named systemvm--4.3 otherwise, right after the database upgrade the management-server fail to start (restart hs well). The idea is quite good, but it should not break cl

Re: Review Request 23806: Re-copying templates to other zones doesn't work

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/23806/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 11:59 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Kishan Ka

Re: 4.5 documentation for vGPU

Hi Seb, I haven't test using tag, but since tag is a definite point in the git repo, we wouldn't be able map version display in RTD and product versions and keep the ability to updated and fix documentation once published with the version. Pierre-Luc On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:53 AM, Sebastien

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6634

Thanks Seb, I've forgot to do this. Rajani, I've just fixed the 'new line'. all version are updated with this new LDAP doc, there is a variable delay between git push and readthedocs build get completed. Thanks, *Pierre-Luc DION* Architecte de Solution Cloud | Cloud Solutions Architect t 855

Re: Review Request 24646: CLOUDSTACK-7337: Volume state remains in allocated after volume creation faliure from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 11:38 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik D

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #163

See

Re: CloudStack UI - very slow or never loads content in large env

Ilya, I'm interesting in knowing if this is due to the UI or just slow responses from the API. Can you open the UI within Google Chrome and open the developer tools. If you switch over to the networking tab you should be able to see how long API calls are taking to respond. On 20 August 2014 08

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #162

See

Hotfix requests

Hi Daan, Sent couple of hotfix requests to Sebastien for 4.3.1, sending you the same for 4.4.1. This contains two fixes related to building and packaging: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hotfix/4.4/7038 Regards, Rohit Yadav Software Architect, Sh

Re: [GSOC] [CLOUDSTACK-6045] Final update

nice work seif, thumbs up :) On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:00 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > Wanted to add to Sebastian's comment your work is very much appreciated. > We hope you stay with us in the future. > > > On 8/20/14, 12:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > >> Great work Seif, thanks for the slide

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 Release Help

Hey, See, if you want to pick the hotfixes; On 20-Aug-2014, at 10:21 am, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > I would love to get: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6892 https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/hotfix/4.3/6892 > and > https://

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 Release Help

Francois I agree, but many on this list had tough time getting to 4.3. Efforts on 4.4.1 are definitely needed, but not all folks will benefit from it just yet. Many will purposely stay 1 major version behind, for the known reasons. 4.3.1 should be an easy one to get done vs 4.4.1 which needs

Re: Review Request 24646: CLOUDSTACK-7337: Volume state remains in allocated after volume creation faliure from snapshot

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24646/ --- (Updated Aug. 20, 2014, 9:26 a.m.) Review request for cloudstack and Koushik Da

RE: 4.5 RM

I see a lot of discussion on enabling CI. Agree that it is important but CI in itself is not going to solve the quality issue. The other important aspect is the effectiveness of tests that get executed as part of CI. Unless there is a proper set of automated tests (which is kept up-to-date) for

RE: Snapshot partial file creates are not cleaned up.

Thanks Sangeetha for your prompt response. Kind Regards -Original Message- From: Sangeetha Hariharan [mailto:sangeetha.hariha...@citrix.com] Sent: Wednesday, 20 August 2014 1:10 AM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; us...@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: RE: Snapshot partial file creates are no

Re: [GSOC] [CLOUDSTACK-6045] Final update

Wanted to add to Sebastian's comment your work is very much appreciated. We hope you stay with us in the future. On 8/20/14, 12:54 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: Great work Seif, thanks for the slides. I hope you stay involved with the community. -sebastien On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Seif

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 Release Help

On Aug 20, 2014, at 4:03 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:28 PM, ilya musayev > wrote: > >> Sebastian, >> >> I'd like to help you with Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 release that is if you >> need help. >> >> If you do need help, lets sync up via call, GTM, IRC or whatever

Re: Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 Release Help

On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:28 PM, ilya musayev wrote: > Sebastian, > > I'd like to help you with Apache CloudStack 4.3.1 release that is if you need > help. > > If you do need help, lets sync up via call, GTM, IRC or whatever else works. > > Regards > ilya Hi Ilya, I have been on vacation, just

Re: [GSOC] [CLOUDSTACK-6045] Final update

Great work Seif, thanks for the slides. I hope you stay involved with the community. -sebastien On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:26 PM, Seif Eddine Jemli wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As you probably know, I have worked on this project whose goal is making > the GUI support adding primary storage to CS th

Re: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces

Hi Jayapal and thanks, I have deleted the advanced zone for now and will attempt an upgrade to 4.4, but if the problem comes up again I'll follow your advice. Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Jayapal Reddy Ura

Jenkins build is still unstable: simulator-singlerun #161

See

CloudStack UI - very slow or never loads content in large env

I have an issue with 4.3.0.1 when i login as admin user. CloudStack UI does not display the object unless i click around multiple times on different sections. This is evident in environment with greater than 500+ VMs. Example: You login and press on Instances - that may or may not load on th

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: CLOUDSTACK-6634

Pdion891, if you amend the commit message with something like: this closes #15 the pr should get closed automatically. On Aug 19, 2014, at 8:39 PM, pdion891 wrote: > Github user pdion891 commented on the pull request: > > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/15#issuecomme

Review Request 24884: CLOUDSTACK-7368: Fixed network cleanup issue in test_add_remove_network.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/24884/ --- Review request for cloudstack and Santhosh Edukulla. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-7368

[GitHub] cloudstack-docs-admin pull request: CLOUDSTACK-5879: Updated rabbi...

Github user terbolous closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-admin/pull/16 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if th