Hello, When I compile -b 4.5 , it show the error as bellow:
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:2.5.1:compile
(default-compile) on project cloud-server: Compilation failure: Compilation
failure:
[ERROR]
Hi everyone,
Don't forget to register for the CloudStack conference in Budapest nov 19-21.
http://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudstack-collaboration-conference-europe
If you are a committer, email me privately to get the registration code.
cheers,
-Sebastien
See http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/job/build-4.5/25/changes
Fixed the error, and 4.5 builds are coming up successfully.
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
From: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 12:56 PM
Cc: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: About the 4.5 Compile Error
Hello, When I compile -b 4.5 , it show the error as
H,
I noticed a lot of commits on master and 4.5 without any links between
them. These could have all been committed on 4.5 and merged back into
master leaving a trail of prove that the same code is in both branches.
It hurts to see this happen. we are at a brink where we can improve on our
way
It builds successfully.
Star Guo
-邮件原件-
发件人: Sanjay Tripathi [mailto:sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com]
发送时间: 2014年10月16日 17:28
收件人: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
主题: RE: About the 4.5 Compile Error
Fixed the error, and 4.5 builds are coming up successfully.
--Sanjay
-Original Message-
On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
H,
I noticed a lot of commits on master and 4.5 without any links between
them. These could have all been committed on 4.5 and merged back into
master leaving a trail of prove that the same code is in both branches.
+1
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 12:02 PM, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
On Oct 16, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Proposal:
All commits come through github PR, *even* for committers. We declare a
moratorium period (agreed suspension of activity)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
...
I will do a test merge-back of 4.5 to master to see how big the damage is.
So I did locally and found:
commit 148efbb73f0e084614eff62f48ea9fa964c64da8
Merge: 1f8cf0b 420d4e0
Author: Daan Hoogland
Hi,
On 16-Oct-2014, at 3:32 pm, sebgoa run...@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal:
All commits come through github PR, *even* for committers. We declare a
moratorium period (agreed suspension of activity) during which direct commit
to master is forbidden.
Only the master RM is allowed to merge
GitHub user DaanHoogland opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/23
Merge 4.5 back into master
It would be good to have this as a daily practice
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Hi,
-0
Upgraded from 4.3.1 to 4.4.1, following the docs
(http://cloudstack-release-notes.readthedocs.org/en/latest/upgrade/upgrade-4.3.html)
it worked and usual VM lifecycle (create, start, stop, reboot etc), networking
etc in basic zone.
The issue is that, the upgrade docs ask you to
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/23#discussion_r18949755
--- Diff: api/src/com/cloud/event/EventTypes.java ---
@@ -454,7 +454,6 @@
public static final String EVENT_BAREMETAL_PXE_SERVER_ADD =
Github user bhaisaab commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/23#discussion_r18949772
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/baremetal/src/com/cloud/baremetal/networkservice/BaremetalKickStartServiceImpl.java
---
@@ -238,7 +232,7 @@ private
+1 on merging(and the proposal).
Unlike the belief that merging adds to dev time it actually makes life
easier to track a commit (after all, it has the same number of commands and
the same conflicts as cherry-pick :) )
We should also define merge strategy for LTS(4.3 and 4.4) branches.
~Rajani
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/23#issuecomment-59347522
Mostly LGTM.
I found a pattern that all the baremetal changes are causing issues, from
the JIRA issue [1] this feature is in progress and I would only
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/23#issuecomment-59348377
Seems like you are the RM for 4.6/master now Rohit, congratulations. I
suggest that you and @ke4qqq do a merge like this on a daily basis. Of course I
would like
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26760/#review56916
---
Ship it!
20d3cf1acc535c3380e52e92a4108444a0b593e3 master
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/23#issuecomment-59356773
Hi Daan, I can help merging things on daily basis but not sure about
official RM position :)
I'm going ahead with the merge. I was just waiting for Travis to
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
- Hardcoded systemvm template names in Upgrade440to441 ::
updateSystemVmTemplates
I don't care about this one as the names are a choice and not bound to any
real name outside of ACS, the url is but it is under our
+1
Tested Advanced Networking with XenServer 6.2
Previous Cluster Details issue has been resolved
Minor bug in the UI with regards to VM Snapshots. If a VM is stopped, and I go
to take a VM Snapshot I still get the option of 'Snapshot Memory' which
obviously is not possible and results in an
It seems master is broken since this commit. We probably shouldn't be
pushing code into the repo that we haven't tried to compile.
commit 148efbb73f0e084614eff62f48ea9fa964c64da8
Merge: 1f8cf0b 420d4e0
Date: Thu Oct 16 12:29:37 2014 +0200
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/4.5' into
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
We probably shouldn't be
pushing code into the repo that we haven't tried to compile.
as I understand it it passed travis, I agree otherwise
--
Daan
Thanks Yitao and Pierre for replying!
I enabled the Zone and monitored the CS server logs.
I did not configured the Secondary Storage earlier and did that.
After that I could see that Secondary Storage and Console Proxy VMs are
starting and stopping again and again.
In the logs:
2014-10-16
Yes, I get the same error.
--Tuna
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:03 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
We probably shouldn't be
pushing code into the repo that we haven't tried to compile.
as I understand it
I can't rule out that it's specific to me at the moment, but I cleaned my
repo and rebuilt with the same failure, then went back to the commit just
before this and it succeeded.
Wouldn't it have to be pushed first to pass any CI testing? So in theory we
should never have CI catch compile errors
Marcus did you try the commit just before the merge? given the location of
the problem it might well be in the vpc refactor work or a combination of
the both.
I am trying myself as well now
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't rule out that it's specific
I've just tried the commit before HEAD. It worked!
--Tuna
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
Marcus did you try the commit just before the merge? given the location of
the problem it might well be in the vpc refactor work or a combination of
the
The commit just before and just after the merge seem to work. They're both
from the 15th.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just tried the commit before HEAD. It worked!
--Tuna
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:10 AM, Daan Hoogland
what do you mean by just after the merge?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com wrote:
The commit just before and just after the merge seem to work. They're both
from the 15th.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Nguyen Anh Tu ng.t...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just tried
I totally agree that we should have some staging tree for this purpose. But
I would prefer deploying gerrit on this rather than using github. Also,
using gerrit would make it possible to host our own Jenkins instance for
testing, rather than depends on TravisCI which is very limited and shared
Oh, sorry Daan, seems I am a little out dated. Just found 4.5 has been
branched without the refactor.
--Sheng
On Oct 16, 2014 11:08 AM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
I totally agree that we should have some staging tree for this purpose.
But I would prefer deploying gerrit on this rather
I mean as they are ordered in the log. The commits before and after the
merge are both working points.
commit 20d3cf1acc535c3380e52e92a4108444a0b593e3
Author: Alex Brett alex.br...@citrix.com
Date: Wed Oct 15 18:50:57 2014 +0100
CLOUDSTACK-7727 Skip various BVT tests on LXC
A number
Sheng, I merged after the branch not before. Did this end up in 4.5?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Sheng Yang sh...@yasker.org wrote:
I totally agree that we should have some staging tree for this purpose. But
I would prefer deploying gerrit on this rather than using github. Also,
using
I found some culprits, it is in partly reverted code that was committed
before the cut of master and 4.5. All to do with Baremetal. I am having a
look.
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:54 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 8:17 PM, Marcus shadow...@gmail.com
+1 (binding) (based on the regression tests I typically run)
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:50 AM, Geoff Higginbottom
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com wrote:
+1
Tested Advanced Networking with XenServer 6.2
Previous Cluster Details issue has been resolved
Minor bug in the UI with regards to
I can't seem to get it working by reverting, neither the merge commit nor
individual related commits.
@Frank: can we disable baremetal all together until you are done?
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:43 PM, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com
wrote:
I found some culprits, it is in partly reverted
Do you know what part of baremetal causes the issue?
I built master on Wed and didn't see any issue. I will give it a try right now.
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 2:28 PM
To: dev; Frank Zhang
Subject: Re:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 11:37 PM, Frank Zhang frank.zh...@citrix.com
wrote:
Do you know what part of baremetal causes the issue?
No it is due to the merge back of the 4.5 branch
I built master on Wed and didn't see any issue. I will give it a try right
now.
I probably resolved some
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26842/
---
Review request for cloudstack, edison su, sangeetha hariharan, and
I think this needs it's own thread as a [PROPOSAL]
So a couple of comments:
1. I think we need to do things in a uniform way. Having patches
committed directly, having patches hit RB and having patches hit GH is
fail.
2. I think we should gate patches, even from committers. I'd
personally like to
Hi Leo,
I have restored Citrix systemvm build machine and added as slave in
Jenkins.buildacloud.org; node systemvmbuilder
Systemvm builds hung, while copying VBoxGuestAdditions_4.2.6.iso from Jenkins
master,
Build machine added as jnpl client, do we need to make any other configuration
to
Try loging into vms each other using ssh ,maybe your template play trick.
Or Using vnc-viewer logged into vm to see if the sshd deamon running
---
Thanks,
Yitao(依涛 姜)
jiangyt.github.io
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 5:48 AM, Bikas mbik...@uic.edu wrote:
Thanks for the replies.
I created another VM
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/26842/#review57111
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- SrikanteswaraRao Talluri
On Oct. 16, 2014,
44 matches
Mail list logo
