Re: Review Request 30793: CLOUDSTACK-8235: Fixed test case in test_bugs.py to read variable data from configurableData section of test_data.py an d also fixed wrong parameter name

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30793/#review72343 --- Ship it! 500baea9b6c816caae93ab2f8d0ba31f99c3f8fc master - Srikant

Re: Review Request 30661: LDAP:automation:added missing scenrio and additional checks for better debugging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30661/#review72341 --- test/integration/component/test_ldap.py

Re: Review Request 30658: CLOUDSTACK-8217: Fixed marvin base library method for passing 'lbdevicecapacity' parameter while adding netscaler device

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30658/#review72340 --- Ship it! 015aed9befcd4f433bebe2f01135456b9688f3c9 master - Srikant

Re: Review Request 30661: LDAP:automation:added missing scenrio and additional checks for better debugging

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30661/#review71956 --- test/integration/component/test_ldap.py

Re: Review Request 30872: CLOUDSTACK-8149: Fixed test_Virtualrouter_alerts, py for Vmware

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30872/#review72337 --- Ship it! eab63a6dd911d3358a1903acf8e510880bfa9ea9 master - Srikant

Re: Review Request 30967: CLOUDSTACK-8253: Code correction and improvement: test_haproxy.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30967/#review72335 --- Ship it! d849a66b47e81e9da234af0ba376327d626462dc master - Srikant

Re: Review Request 30975: CLOUDSTACK-8254: Choosing high end service offering for HyperV in case it tries to SSH to VM because Hyperv needs more resources because it is GUI based VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30975/#review72332 --- Ship it! dc4578dd443ea29b7e7a79660faee4b4959b71f9 master - Srikant

Review Request 30975: CLOUDSTACK-8254: Choosing high end service offering for HyperV in case it tries to SSH to VM because Hyperv needs more resources because it is GUI based VM

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30975/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82

Re: Review Request 19195: Automation of CCP Objects Verification after external changes made to the original setup

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/19195/#review72329 --- pushed to master 7461297f3e17b431643e7a8c575e799d0e151261 - Srikant

Review Request 30967: CLOUDSTACK-8253: Code correction and improvement: test_haproxy.py

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/30967/ --- Review request for cloudstack and SrikanteswaraRao Talluri. Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-82

Re: Live migration ip address with kvm

It's not a good idea to use resource tags. Resource tags should not be used by CloudStack itself to do business logic, just for arbitrary metadata the admin may want. The trick is that you want the source host to know that the destination host has a secondary IP that can be used for live migration

Re: Forward: About Instance Storage Live Migration on VMware

I am curious, when you say you used VMware's Storage vMotion, do you mean the intent was to live migrate the storage underlying one of your VMs? I was not aware that CloudStack supported this. I believe CloudStack supports the offline migration of VM disks, but it seems to me that, say, offline mi

RE: [MERGE] Support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack over VMware hypervisor

> -Original Message- > From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com] > Sent: 14 January 2015 14:46 > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: [MERGE] Support Granular SCSI disk controllers in CloudStack > over VMware hypervisor > > Hi Sateesh, > > Can can send a Github PR for

Live migration ip address with kvm

Hi, all, Can I create tags in physical host in CloudStack ? I see template and instance support tags. I want to add a tag like “livemigrationipaddress” on kvm host, and change the kvm hypervisor code support assign the live migration ip address (may be storage network with 10gbps ) whil

Forward: About Instance Storage Live Migration on VMware

Does any one know about that ? Best Regards, Star Guo -邮件原件- 发件人: Star Guo [mailto:st...@ceph.me] 发送时间: 2015年2月12日 9:24 收件人: us...@cloudstack.apache.org 主题: About Instance Storage Live Migration on VMware Hi, All, My env is cloudstack 4.4.2 + VMware 5.5, and it works well. I

Re: host memory stats

Opened CLOUDSTACK-8250 for the host memory used issue. Can anyone confirm that this happens on XenServer and HyperV as well? I want to make sure that all of the hypervisors report this field as KB before trying to convert to bytes. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Marcus wrote: > Also, the vm gu

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

First, ASF needs to be selected as a mentoring organization. Then students will apply and send proposals for listed projects. And we will accept or reject student proposals. We dont reject projects. Most likely however, if u want ur project to have a student u need to actively look for a studen

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

So Sebastien, What if anything is expected of potential mentors before acceptance of projects? On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 2:29 PM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Adrian Lewis wrote: > >> Would it be bad form to suggest ideas if we're neither student, nor a >> mentor? > >

Re: CloudStack Days 2015

Sebastien - I'm happy to be on the committee to help review paper submissions. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 7:25 AM, Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > On Feb 11, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Karen Vuong wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > In 2015, five CloudStack Days events will be held across the globe. Each >

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

On Feb 12, 2015, at 6:30 AM, Adrian Lewis wrote: > Would it be bad form to suggest ideas if we're neither student, nor a > mentor? not bad form, but there is an implicit suggestion that if you put up an idea in JIRA, then you will mentor a student that gets accepted for that project. > > ---

Re: CloudStack Days 2015

On Feb 11, 2015, at 5:42 PM, Karen Vuong wrote: > Hi all, > > > > In 2015, five CloudStack Days events will be held across the globe. Each > one-day event will feature morning plenary sessions and afternoon breakout > sessions in user and developer tracks. Here are the dates and websites for

Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

No but the chances of actual implementation are of course highly reduced. I did propose a subject myself and haven't gotten around lobbying for a student yet. On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Adrian Lewis wrote: > Would it be bad form to suggest ideas if we're neither student, nor a > mentor? >

Re: query about 4.4 usage

Hello Daan and users, We at Exoscale are now using in Production a 4.4 CloudStack base + our patches after an extensive preproduction run with this version. Next migration is unlikely to be 4.5. Please, let¹s adopt all proper rebasing from one version to another in order not to have bugs fixed in

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: One of the routers is not running, so we ...

GitHub user wilderrodrigues opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/77 One of the routers is not running, so we don't have to continue here sin... ...ce the host will be null any way. Also, there is no need To check either for sanity of duplicate mas

RE: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming

Would it be bad form to suggest ideas if we're neither student, nor a mentor? -Original Message- From: Tilak Raj Singh [mailto:tila...@gmail.com] Sent: 06 February 2015 19:03 To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: Google Summer of Code 2015 is coming Hi, I posted my project idea for

Re: host memory stats

Also, the vm guest CPU stats seem to report the % of the host cpu that the vm is using (e.g. a 1 core VM on a 6 core hypervisor, running a CPU benchmark reports 16.6% cpu (or ~1/6 of 100%), while a dual core reports ~33.3%). At least with KVM hypervisor. Is that expected and consistent with other h

host memory stats

Look at your hosts, click the statistics tab. Is everyone else seeing that memory used needs to be multiplied by 1024? I checked KVM w/ACS 4.5 and a VMware cluster with CP 4.3

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8245: Scrolling down the netwo...

GitHub user rags22489664 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/76 CLOUDSTACK-8245: Scrolling down the network service providers list from ... ...the UI never ends You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://git