On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The Announcement should be published on
Hi,
I'm pretty aligned with Rajani concerns, which is why I've always used
apt-get.eu as repo in the docs. Also, recent RCs I've participate, testers
were using systemvm-template from jenkins so systemvm-templates that end up
on apt-get.eu repo are tested one copied from Jenkins. there is
GitHub user landro opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/323
Fixed yum and apt repo locations used by chef in devcloud4
The testing repos seem to be gone - currently returning HTTP 404. I'm
modified the urls to point at the upstream apache versions
You
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/318#issuecomment-106589140
Thanks for fixing this @wilderrodrigues
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/323
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/28/2015 04:48 PM, Logan Barfield wrote:
Hi Star,
I'll +1 this. I would like to see support for RBD snapshots as
well, and maybe have a method to backup the snapshots to
secondary storage. Right now for large volumes it can take an hour
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
Hello Rohit,
I've tried your process, but my debian7/CS4.51 doesn't work well.
(I have changed in the database, table vm_template, the type USER to
SYSTEM for the sharpeblue systemvm and SYSTEM to USER for the old systemvm)
The Console proxy starts well, but the SSVM started only after 3
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/323#issuecomment-106591169
LGTM.
@bhaisaab You might want to change this back when/if the testing repo comes
back?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Thanks for bringing the topic up. As it’s not related to a specific
vulnerability or something that needs to be discussed in private, I’ll keep the
conversation on dev@. Generally I’m happy to see discussions about security
design happen in public so all can learn. This convo hit my filters so
+1 , wait for it.
Best Regards,
Star Guo
===
+2 :)
On 28 May 2015 at 17:21, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
+1 for this
- Original Message -
From: Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 3:48:09
. there is reference
to cloud.com repos as well, and this is into the database of CloudStack.
BTW, systemVM 4.5.1 on cloud.com is broken, cat /etc/*release gives version
4.4, and VR fails to start...(we used S3 Secondary Store for testing, so
could not download from apt or shapeblue...
On 29
Andrija,
Can you redeploy using the 4.5.1 systemvm template and an NFS as secondary
Storage, then use this API:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.5/root_admin/updateCloudToUseObjectStore.html
to migrate from NFS to S3 ? Did try that once and had success, you can
refer to 60 Recipes for
Hi Pierre,
yes Im aware of that mifration, but we tried to deploy zone from
scratch...anyway, with hacking the DB, it was fine later, but we postoned
S3 testing for some later stage, and will use probably the migration path
as you suggested.
Thx !
On 29 May 2015 at 01:39, Pierre-Luc Dion
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/321#issuecomment-106681254
@wilderrodrigues thank you :)
There isnt any marvin test. But, to test it manually, reduce the cleanup
thread interval to a very low value(may be 10 sec)
Hi,
If you have a plug-in that adds a custom config value and an admin updates
that config value, is there a way to have custom validation logic invoked?
For example, let's say you want to add a custom config value that's
associated with each and every account (ex. total.miniops). If the admin
Thanks Rohit Andrija,
I hereby confirm that the command sent by Andrija worked fine and the template
spinned on Centos 6.6, after running the following command from Ubuntu 14
qemu-img convert -f qcow2 systemvm64template-4.3-kvm.qcow2 -O qcow2 -o
compat=0.10 systemvm64template-4.3-kvm.qcowold
Hi All,
Kindly spare sometime to read below blog which is really true where we face
in real time.
I believe ACS and xenserver should work together to bring ACS as best.
http://blog.remibergsma.com/2015/05/23/making-xenserver-and-cloudstack-sing-and-dance-together-again/
Thanks,
Keerthi
Yes, it is an intermittent phenomena. not a consistent one ;)
Op do 28 mei 2015 om 08:45 schreef Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com:
Actually, the github mirror is pretty up to date. Since I became committer
I have seen it get updated within a few seconds after a push towards ACS
The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
I could've done it if I only knew how :-)
--
Erik
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Rohit Yadav rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com
wrote:
Done.
On 09-May-2015, at 3:35
+1 on buidling,,,
Also from, https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/
Main | Next page »
WEDNESDAY JAN 28, 2015
CloudStack and the Ghost glibc vulnerability
...
...
CloudStack community members have built an updated system VM template,
which ShapeBlue is hosting at
Actually, the github mirror is pretty up to date. Since I became committer I
have seen it get updated within a few seconds after a push towards ACS git.
The commit I pushed yesterday was published just now.
I hope it comes back to normality soon.
Cheers,
Wilder
On 27 May 2015, at 19:06,
Actually it did not update the mirror yet.
sanjeev authored 19 hours ago - commit fabbfe5f9a39bf350757a88aeddb06f413a6fb84
Cheers,
Wilder
On 28 May 2015, at 08:44, Wilder Rodrigues
wrodrig...@schubergphilis.commailto:wrodrig...@schubergphilis.com wrote:
Actually, the github mirror is pretty
Hi Erik,
On 28-May-2015, at 9:20 am, Erik Weber terbol...@gmail.com wrote:
The Announcement should be published on blogs.apache.org/cloudstack as
well, to feed the RSS processor on cloudstack.apache.org.
I could've done it if I only knew how :-)
I’m not sure how to do it as well. I’ve
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/315
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for getting in touch!
First of all, good to hear we agree that this change wasn't done in a nice
way. For now, I think we should focus on documenting this change properly
so folks are aware they need to change their setup. I wrote some
documentation already that I'll port to
Hi all,
Please, could someone have a look at that?
http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/computer/systemvmbuilder/
The slave node is offline. The latest successful SSVM build is from the 4th May.
Cheers,
Wilder
Pretty good read though :) Im glad to see others are using SF with ACS!!
FG
On May 27, 2015 9:13 PM, Mike Tutkowski mike.tutkow...@solidfire.com
wrote:
I must make that mistake at least once or twice a year. :/
Sorry for the spam! :(
On Wednesday, May 27, 2015, Sebastien Goasguen
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/317
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Daan - I just tested this (but on 4.5.1), and it doesnt work, at least in
my setup:
2015-05-28 16:14:56,108 DEBUG [kvm.storage.LibvirtStorageAdaptor]
(agentRequest-Handler-1:null) Trying to fetch storage pool
8457c284-cf5d-3979-b82e-32ea5efeb97b from libvirt
2015-05-28 16:14:56,257 DEBUG
Andrija, the code you refer to is post-4.5. it is not in 4.4 or 4.5.So I am
a bit confused by your remark.
How do you mean it generates the error you got?
Did you apply the patch from PR-281 on 4.5.1 and tested?
or did you test a vanilla 4.5.1?
Op do 28 mei 2015 om 16:22 schreef Andrija Panic
Not really, volume is still fine (undamaged) :) but resize doesnt work,
seems like code-only issue, since on debug agent in logs, I dont see
anything sent to libvirt etc...confirmed from inside VM.
On 28 May 2015 at 16:58, Daan Hoogland daan.hoogl...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, that one is. It
Marcus reported corrupted volumes due to this, in the pr:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/281#issuecomment-104432629
I am not sure it was due to this code or that it didn't get solved by this
code. As it is in 4.5 and master I will leave it in for now. meaning in
4.4.4.
Op do 28 mei
+1 for this
- Original Message -
From: Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 3:48:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Feature] Cloudstack KVM with RBD
Hi Star,
I'll +1 this. I would like to see support for RBD snapshots as well,
and
Ah...sorry for that, my bad... I understood it's already present on 4.5.1
vanial..
But I understood that this commit IS actually already present in 4.5.1:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/commit/173909e99d85cfcc85b017bc426950f9f16fddf0
?
On 28 May 2015 at 16:33, Daan Hoogland
Hi Star,
I'll +1 this. I would like to see support for RBD snapshots as well,
and maybe have a method to backup the snapshots to secondary
storage. Right now for large volumes it can take an hour or more to
finish the snapshot.
I have already discussed this with Wido, and was able to determine
yes, that one is. It doesn't solve the problem, I understand. Does it
worsen it?
Op do 28 mei 2015 om 16:56 schreef Andrija Panic andrija.pa...@gmail.com:
Ah...sorry for that, my bad... I understood it's already present on 4.5.1
vanial..
But I understood that this commit IS actually already
The specific comment Marcus made was warning - but it was/is already
commited in 4.5.1 vanila. But it doesnt work as it seems...
Even qemu-img resize worked fine for me on poweredoff VMs/volumes mutiply
times (with DB changes), and later we fix manually partitions/FS inside OS.
But here also live
+2 :)
On 28 May 2015 at 17:21, Andrei Mikhailovsky and...@arhont.com wrote:
+1 for this
- Original Message -
From: Logan Barfield lbarfi...@tqhosting.com
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 28 May, 2015 3:48:09 PM
Subject: Re: [Feature] Cloudstack KVM with RBD
Hi Star,
GitHub user gauravaradhye opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/322
CLOUDSTACK-8526: Use more memory for HyperV VMs in case SSH is tried to VM
VMs on HyperV are GUI based. They require at least 1 GB memory if SSH to VM
is to be tested.
Other
Thanks, Remi. I wasn't personally involved in the case that went wrong (and
that caused Anthony to rethink this), and I couldn't find the original customer
ticket, so I only remember some of the details. I do remember that the previous
CloudStack HA used Pool.emergency_transition_to_master(),
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/322
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
42 matches
Mail list logo
