[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8572:Unable to deploy VM as no...

Github user gauravaradhye commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/480#issuecomment-114025746 Please close this review request. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proje

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8574: Skip testcases for LXC i...

Github user gauravaradhye commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/488#discussion_r32909733 --- Diff: test/integration/component/test_stopped_vm.py --- @@ -53,6 +54,13 @@ def setUpClass(cls): cls.domain = get_domain(cls.api_clie

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8572:Unable to deploy VM as no...

Github user pritisarap12 closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/480 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the featu

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix findbugs DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSI...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/498 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix 2 findbugs occurences of DM_BOXED_PRI...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/499 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix 2 more findbugs DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FO...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/500 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix findbugs DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSI...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/501 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix findbugs DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSI...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/502 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix findbugs DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSI...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/504 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix findbugs DM_BOXED_PRIMITIVE_FOR_PARSI...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/503 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Fix findbugs SQL_PREPARED_STATEMENT_GENER...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/505 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1292

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2109 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change [EnvInject] - Loading node environment vari

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1293

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2110 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2414 originally caused by: Started

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#discussion_r32917802 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/pom.xml --- @@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ ../../pom.xml - -org.apache.xmlrpc -xmlr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#discussion_r32917768 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/pom.xml --- @@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ ../../pom.xml - -org.apache.xmlrpc -xmlr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#discussion_r32917853 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/pom.xml --- @@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ ../../pom.xml - -org.apache.xmlrpc -xmlr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#discussion_r32917814 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/pom.xml --- @@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ ../../pom.xml - -org.apache.xmlrpc -xmlr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user rsafonseca commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#discussion_r32917874 --- Diff: plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/pom.xml --- @@ -27,11 +27,31 @@ ../../pom.xml - -org.apache.xmlrpc -xmlr

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user rsafonseca commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497#issuecomment-114054951 @karuturi done in a nicer way, as requested :) FYI, the only thing that is needed to actually fix the ovm3 problem is the changes to plugins/hypervisors/ovm3/

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Attempt to resolve ovm3 jenkins failure

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/497 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8576: Skip tests for LXC

GitHub user pritisarap12 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/506 CLOUDSTACK-8576: Skip tests for LXC Skipping testcases for LXC as it doesn't support snapshots and templates creation also excluded unittest as it was not used. You can merge this pull re

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1294

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2111 originally caused by: Started by an SCM change Started by an SCM change Started by upstream project "build-master"

Build failed in Jenkins: simulator-singlerun #1295

See -- Started by upstream project "build-master-simulator" build number 2112 originally caused by: Started by upstream project "build-master" build number 2416 originally caused by: Started

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8576: Skip tests for LXC

Github user sanju1010 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/506#discussion_r32927724 --- Diff: test/integration/component/test_resource_limits.py --- @@ -748,6 +748,8 @@ def test_05_templates_per_account(self): #should be

Re: 4.6

Hi guys, I plan on getting started on dissecting the embedded Tomcat/Jetty PR this week, it would be nice to get it into 4.6.0, since it's quite a change in functional packaging to do it in a minor like 4.6.1 (documentation wise and stuff), and i guess 4.7.0 is still far down the road. Want to hol

Re: 4.6

On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Hi guys, > > I plan on getting started on dissecting the embedded Tomcat/Jetty PR this > week, it would be nice to get it into 4.6.0, since it's quite a change in > functional packaging to do it in a minor like 4.6.1 (documentation wise and >

Re: [GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8576: Skip tests for LXC

Please ignore my comment. I confirmed with Kishan and he said template creation from volume is not supported in LXC. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 5:45 PM, sanju1010 wrote: > Github user sanju1010 commented on a diff in the pull request: > > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/506#discussion

Re: 4.6

Hi Sebastien, thx for following up so quickly :) It's because it's a big change that i think it should be done in a major release an not a minor, nevertheless it will be up to the community to decide if we should ship it in 4.6.0 of wait for a long time to have this in. I've been waiting a long t

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8577: fixing script testpath_d...

GitHub user nitt10prashant opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/507 CLOUDSTACK-8577: fixing script testpath_disable_enable_zone disable enable cluster ... === TestName: test_01_disable_enable_cluster | Status : SUCCESS === ok disable enable host

Re: 4.6

On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:55 PM, Rafael Fonseca wrote: > Hi Sebastien, thx for following up so quickly :) > > It's because it's a big change that i think it should be done in a major > release an not a minor, We all agree on this. Such as change is for a major release. The question is 4.6 or 4.7

Re: [VOTE] release candidate 4.4.4 (4.4-RC20150618T1117)

tested specifically the blocker issue in a two host cluster with an isolated network. both the option values false and true gave expected result on setting router.reboot.when.outofband.migrated based on this behavior and the fact that setup worked smoothly +1 (binding) one point of attention is

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [WIP] CLOUDSTACK-6276: project support in...

GitHub user resmo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/508 [WIP] CLOUDSTACK-6276: project support in affinitygroups You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/resmo/cloudstack feature/6276-projec

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [WIP] CLOUDSTACK-6276: affinitygroup: imp...

Github user resmo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/264#issuecomment-114142748 closing this in favour of re-based and updated PR #508 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well.

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [WIP] CLOUDSTACK-6276: affinitygroup: imp...

Github user resmo closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/264 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

Re: question about Admin's capability to create a VM on a disabled host

Hi Raja, I can think of this use case --> An admin can verify if a host is production ready by deploying a resource first on it before actual users deploy and fail due to any specific reasons. Thanks, Praveen Kumar, Founder,PSI Cloud Solutions, psiclouds.com. On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 12:14 PM, R

Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm-master #540

See -- Started by timer [EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables. Building remotely on coohq-slave-01 (cloudstack-buildslave-centos6 systemvmbuilder) in workspace

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8574: Skip testcases for LXC i...

Github user pritisarap12 commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/488#discussion_r33011867 --- Diff: test/integration/component/test_stopped_vm.py --- @@ -53,6 +54,13 @@ def setUpClass(cls): cls.domain = get_domain(cls.api_clien

RE: question about Admin's capability to create a VM on a disabled host

Yes... that makes sense. Thanks Praveen! -Original Message- From: Praveen B [mailto:pbprave...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, June 22, 2015 11:13 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: question about Admin's capability to create a VM on a disabled host Hi Raja, I can think of this u