Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-152178160
@K0zka @karuturi I am using tomcat 6 as well. agree with Rajani
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user serbaut commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152180011
Thank you, that would have taken me days to write.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
The apache build reports rats, findbugs, pmd, coverage etc.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Miguel Ferreira <
mferre...@schubergphilis.com> wrote:
> It would add speed.
>
> Just for running maven we could move the travis build to their docker
> based infra which is faster than what we use now.
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1003#issuecomment-152160447
hmm, in a advanced network setup, these IP address would be the private IPs
but if it has a static NAT, the VM would also have a public IP.
For a user, it
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1003#issuecomment-152165313
@resmo the field value and label is same as on the detail view's Nic tab -
the default nic (or nic 1).
I'm sure there are more better ways of fixing the
Github user karuturi commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-152176166
Hi @k0zka are you saying it might be specific to tomcat6? Reverting the the
change works fine.
Do you think we should revert this until we find a solution
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
>
> > On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
> >
> > Sebastien, it is not urgent but costing us time
>
> so just don;t look at it ?
>
no-op. it is there telling people that
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152183473
I have same issue with Remi,
there are two virtio-serial in the vm definition.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996#issuecomment-152187750
Ping @remibergsma @DaanHoogland @borisroman @wido @miguelaferreira
Thanks, @karuturi! :) LGTM :+1:
Test results:
* Hardware
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1004#issuecomment-152159431
@wido not a really big feature, I think we should still accept UI changes?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1003#issuecomment-152163454
Yes I see, but the label "IP address" does not indicate that it is the
first NIC's IP address :). It might make sense to change the label to be more
precise in that.
Hi all,
Just had a chat with Miguel.
He showed me that if we setup Github to notify Jenkins on “issue comments”
(next to “pull requests” we have now) and then set a “trigger phrase” in
Jenkins, we could automatically trigger a new build by typing “go build”. No
more need to force push commits
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/995#issuecomment-152192762
Testing this PR now.
Cheers,
Wilder
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#discussion_r43389852
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_router_dhcphosts.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152193618
by the way, for user vms, I think it is better to add the field in
vm_instance/user_vm or zone/cluster/global setting to determine if the vm is
qemu guest agent
Github user serbaut commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#discussion_r43384431
--- Diff: test/integration/component/test_router_dhcphosts.py ---
@@ -0,0 +1,381 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152189749
@remibergsma @karuturi
All green... Do you have some time to review/merge this PR? It's a test, no
code - neither on the routers nor the java side
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#issuecomment-152195378
@snuf Can you respond to the comment by @dahn? Then we can proceed to merge
this. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
It would add speed.
Just for running maven we could move the travis build to their docker based
infra which is faster than what we use now.
I’m guess that the apache build does more stuff like packaging RPMs, but I’m
not sure there.
\ Miguel Ferreira
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
> > On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
> >>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland
Sebastien, it is not urgent but costing us time and more important costing
time of 'innocent' contributors. So ... revert at your will.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
wrote:
> Not surprisingly I like Travis, because it outsources the “tests” and that
> we
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152187084
succeed after the following change:
diff --git
a/plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152191665
that is good idea. then we need to rebuild systemvm template with
qemu-guest-agent
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152194820
@wilderrodrigues Testing this now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user serbaut commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/981#issuecomment-152175108
Sorry, been busy. Running tests now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user nnesic opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1006
Fixed user_vm_view to only display keypairs belonging to the account.
The user_vm_view displayes the keypair information by joining vm_details
with ssh_keypairs on the key value exclusively.
Github user kansal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/916#issuecomment-152152422
@remibergsma @bhaisaab The above changes were made as the part of DHCP/DNS
offload feature. The related ticket is
GitHub user ustcweizhou opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1007
CLOUDSTACK-8958: add dedicated ips to domain (account for now)
For now, we dedicate ip pool to account, however, other accounts in the
same domain cannot fetch the ip from this ip pool.
Hi,
We are building Debian packages on unstable branches (4.5 branch to be
specific). The Debian source format 30. rejects the version 4.5.3-SNAPSHOT
with an error "Can't build with source format 3.0 native: native package
version may not have a revision."
Source format 1.0 allows this value,
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152188711
Hmm, ok. That should be allowed. Since we want the Guest tools also to be
supported on SSVMs to control them properly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152157162
@borisroman Could you give this PR a spin?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user wido opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1005
kvm: Add UnitTests for LibvirtUtilitiesHelper
These were lacking, but this helper is used in various places
inside the KVM code.
Some simple tests to verify the helper is doing what
Github user wido commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1004#issuecomment-152157062
Isn't 4.5 closed for features? I know this might sound picky, but as far as
I know we are only supposed to fix bugs in a point release.
---
If your project is set up
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1003#issuecomment-152162038
@resmo the IP of the first nic, not necessarily public/private. I removed
displayname as adding ip address column screwed up the width/alignment issue
and it's a
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152161769
@wido I will also test it again today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Not surprisingly I like Travis, because it outsources the “tests” and that we
can fix them by editing .travis.yml, which can be done by someone without
access to the Jenkins servers/slaves.
At the very least I agree with Miguel which should keep the mvn build, and
possible rat etc…
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Sebastien, it is not urgent but costing us time
so just don;t look at it ?
> and more important costing
> time of 'innocent' contributors.
What do you mean by that, I am not understanding.
> So ... revert at
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:22 PM, Sebastien Goasguen
> wrote:
>
>>
>>> On Oct 29, 2015, at 2:19 PM, Daan Hoogland
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Sebastien, it is not urgent but
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/975#issuecomment-152189257
Ping @remibergsma @snuf
I did not test any OVM3 specifics, but @snuf did. The PR doesn't break
existing functionality.
Although the
Github user miguelaferreira commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/935#issuecomment-152197682
@nvazquez I havent' forgotten your PR. I'm having some trouble with the
automation to re-create a NSX cluster with a KVM host in our test environment.
As
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/916#issuecomment-152196235
Hi @kansal
Should I deploy a basic zone with shared network in order to see if that
fix is fine?
I will also run the other set of tests,
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996#issuecomment-152202839
Ping @bhaisaab you may want to backport this small fix to 4.5
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Build environment isn't Windows, it's Ubuntu 14.04 that I am getting this build
failure on.
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 1:50 AM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Build fails on
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-152208509
@K0zka If you know of a fix for Tomcat6 we can merge that. Otherwise I
think we should consider reverting. We can wait a bit but if there is no
solution at the
Hi Ron,
Yes you need an account on github.com
> On Oct 29, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Ron Wheeler
> wrote:
>
> I am new to this and trying to create a pull request in Eclipse and get the
> message:
> "Unexpected error: API rate limit exceeded for 24.37.79.202."
>
> It
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/879#issuecomment-152234419
code reviewed. nothing strange. lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/981
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152208845
@serbaut If you think this should go into master, please comment LGTM
(Looks Good To Me) with any testing / verification you did. We need 2 LGTMs
before we can
I am new to this and trying to create a pull request in Eclipse and get
the message:
"Unexpected error: API rate limit exceeded for 24.37.79.202."
It goes on to suggest that balance would be restored to the universe if
I was authenticated.
Do I need to have an account to create pull
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996#issuecomment-152201239
LGTM as well!
![screen shot 2015-10-29 at 15 41
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996#issuecomment-152203911
@remibergsma good idea, will do thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152203550
LGTM
Run this:
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=true
Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996#issuecomment-152205902
@remibergsma just checked this does not apply for 4.5, 4.5 has no prefilter
in that section
(see screenshot on 4.5)
![screen shot 2015-10-29 at 8 25 52
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/897#issuecomment-152214761
@nitin-maharana I looked at this, seems good. What is the best way to test
this or see the difference?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/996
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1005#issuecomment-152213938
@wido You'd onky changed a methode name and added a getter. But no Unit
test were added right? Forgot "git add ." before commiting?
---
If your project is set
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152220381
It says test failures 0. I have no idea why it's red! In addition, no Java
code was changed!
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152264912
@remibergsma @wilderrodrigues Also ran the test against PR #981 => LGTM
:+1:
```
=== TestName: test_router_dhcphosts | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok
I think I figured it out.
Started working on a subtask CLOUDSTACK-9004 to re-factor and add some needed
features to HyperVEnlightenmentFeatureDef.
I'll submit a PR for it once I finish and then start working on the
implementation mentioned in the parent task CLOUDSTACK-8978
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-152271301
@karuturi @K0zka @ustcweizhou @DaanHoogland @miguelaferreira I just
reverted the commit.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/961#issuecomment-152269280
@remibergsma this doesn't work in tomcat7 either. We ran tests on centos7
and only half a page is loaded.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user sudhansu7 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/897#issuecomment-152273822
@remibergsma @runseb
I have below performance analysis, which I did some time back. I trying to
find out the dbdump to do a real test. But below analysis
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/955#issuecomment-152275904
LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch (which I rebased
myself first):
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/927#issuecomment-152284702
@karuturi I tested the `test_vpc_site2site_vpn ` two more times, and it
keeps failing. The same tests on master succeeds and also on other branches I
recently
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/848
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hi Nux, et all,
How would I go about adding a strongswan ipsec client to the macchinina
template?
Are you also responsible for the images here?
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/macchinina/x86_64/
Michael
On 08/05/15 16:12, "David Nalley" wrote:
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/977#issuecomment-152302260
@wido @sateesh-chodapuneedi @bhaisaab can you please see if you are
satisfied with the present state (with respect to your comments)?
---
If your project is
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/848#issuecomment-152291324
code reviewed as requested by @remibergsma no comments. LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/879#issuecomment-152293339
Will run the tests again since the commit changed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user milamberspace commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/941#discussion_r43433493
--- Diff: ui/scripts/network.js ---
@@ -6504,7 +6432,123 @@
}
}
}
-
Github user milamberspace commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/941#discussion_r43433516
--- Diff: ui/scripts/network.js ---
@@ -6504,7 +6432,123 @@
}
}
}
-
Github user milamberspace commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/941#discussion_r43433480
--- Diff: ui/scripts/network.js ---
@@ -4495,99 +4511,11 @@
Github user resmo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/981#issuecomment-152302053
is 4.5 also affected by this issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/818#issuecomment-152282736
LGTM, based on a set of tests that I run on this branch (which I rebased
myself first):
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s
Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/818#discussion_r43429125
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkVO.java ---
@@ -616,7 +616,8 @@ public void setStrechedL2Network(boolean
strechedL2Network)
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1002#issuecomment-152286968
Agree that the Jenkins failure is unrelated. Will soon merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/945#issuecomment-152290121
based on code review LGTM. @nitin-maharana makes sense to write a marvin
test for this. could you?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user pdube commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/879#issuecomment-152300355
@remibergsma The commit didn't change, I just rebased
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/955#issuecomment-152279403
@SudharmaJain Your change looks good at first sight. Did you verify that
your intended behaviour actually happens? and how? The name of the vpn is now
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1001#issuecomment-152292108
let's save this to the last moment but ltgm @remibergsma @karuturi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/832#issuecomment-152300766
@borisroman Can you force push this PR please and rebase it with current
master? Then we can run some tests! Pinging @dahn to look at the code.
---
If your
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/982#issuecomment-152303070
@xenserverarmy Sure, it works. It's very easy, the files end up in
`/etc/xapi.d/plugins`. Are you able to verify yourself?
---
If your project is set up for
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/916#issuecomment-152290835
code lgtm @remibergsma can you retest? A newer commit is in since your lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/945
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1006#issuecomment-152306235
Thanks for the fix @nnesic ! Pinging @DaanHoogland @bhaisaab to review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/985#issuecomment-152332158
uservm can not start
2015-10-29 21:04:38,017 WARN [resource.wrapper.LibvirtStartCommandWrapper]
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/982#issuecomment-152304547
@DaanHoogland @wilderrodrigues You can do this to test this PR:
```
./kvm_local_deploy.py -r xenserver65
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/926#issuecomment-152306229
ran
```
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=${marvinCfg} -s -a
tags=advanced,required_hardware=true \
component/test_vpc_redundant.py \
Trying to help out with the docs without doing too much damage.
I am new to git.
I am using Eclipse with the egit/mylyn plug-in and I have managed to get
the source for the docs-admin downloaded.
The "Configure Fetch" has a Source Ref of "refs/heads/*" and a
Desctination Ref of
Github user borisroman commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/832#issuecomment-152337266
@remibergsma @wilderrodrigues @DaanHoogland Done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
GitHub user davidamorimfaria opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1008
adjust packaging for centos7
Here are a few adjustments for the packaging in centos7. With these changes
I was able to start the service. Please review. Thank you.
You can merge
2 hours before this message was sent, there was a message about
jenkins being unreliable.
So I am starting to think that something other than Travis or Jenkins
is the problem.
--David
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> Guys and dolls,
>
> We have
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/981#issuecomment-152101614
ping @serbaut @remibergsma
Can you please do a force push to see if we get Jenkins green? I know is a
pain in the ass to depend on Jenkins/Travis
Hi,
Can someone please look why Jenkins fails so often recently? It feels like a
casino and slows down merging of PRs since we want to merge when they “are
green”. This requires forse pushing many times now, including the wait.
I’d prefer not to start ignoring them..
Thanks for the help!
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/998#issuecomment-152106800
Will merge when Travis and Jenkins are green.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user remibergsma commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/981#issuecomment-152106955
@serbaut Will merge when Travis and Jenkins are green.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user terbolous commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/999#issuecomment-152107883
The changes themselves LGTM, I can test them as well just to be sure, takes
some time though :-)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/998#discussion_r43352356
--- Diff: systemvm/patches/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/configure.py ---
@@ -41,27 +41,37 @@
from cs.CsMonitor import CsMonitor
from
Github user wilderrodrigues commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/998#issuecomment-152087954
Ping @remibergsma @karuturi @miguelaferreira
Test results
* Hardware required: false
* Management Server + MySQL on CentOS 7.1
* One
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo