Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Ok, that’s fine. Let’s keep it open during the weekend and see on Monday morning where we are. Regards, Remi On 07/11/15 17:47, "Erik Weber" wrote: >Aren't vote periods usually extended through weekends? > >Erik > >Den lørdag 7. november 2015 skrev Remi Bergsma >følgende: > >> As requested

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hello, My vote : +1 (binding) Tests on Ubuntu 14.04 / KVM / Adv Network without SG Some tests (register template, create vm, network, etc) with the ansible cloudstack module : ok Checking if the localization of all languages displays correctly. Found 2 with errors : German and Chinese. See

Re: Automatically trigger a new Jenkins build

All, +1000 to this idea. bors [1] is an example of this type of system that works well. It provides on-demand build and implements the project’s rules to merge changes to the master/develop branch (e.g. an LGTM from two committers). In addition to enforcing the project’s policies, it ensures

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Just a quick note, Sebastian: RAT is running on Master (jenkins.b.a.c.org) which has actually the same code as 4.6.0 RC1. If Pierre Luc push the RC to the Docker hub and we can run real tests, that would be nice, but perhaps too late now. But running a RC against the s

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

+1 (Binding) setup: RHEL 6.5 Management server, xen 6.5 Hypervisor, NFS storage, Advanced zone without sg (Manual testing) Rpm creation, install worked fine Was able to succesfully launch a vm, destroy etc. Upload template worked fine LDAP new as well existing integration worked fine RabbitMQ i

Re: New PMC member: Erik Weber

Congrats Erik. --- John Burwell (@john_burwell) VP of Software Engineering, ShapeBlue (571) 403-2411 | +44 20 3603 0542 http://www.shapeblue.com | @ShapeBlue 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, London, WC2N 4HS > On Nov 4, 2015, at 5:55 AM, Boris Schrijver wrote: > > Congrats Erik! > > -- > > Met

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

On Nov 7, 2015, at 2:33 PM, Remi Bergsma wrote: > As requested by Boris, I’ll extend the vote until the end of today CET > (instead of 4pm CET), that’s 8 extra hours. > > Anyone else actively testing? I was waiting for Pierre Luc to push the RC to docker hub to at least test the simulator. A

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Aren't vote periods usually extended through weekends? Erik Den lørdag 7. november 2015 skrev Remi Bergsma følgende: > As requested by Boris, I’ll extend the vote until the end of today CET > (instead of 4pm CET), that’s 8 extra hours. > > Anyone else actively testing? > > Regards, > Remi > > F

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Remi, Looking back over previous releases, we have not invalidated an RCs due to packaging issues. While it seems a bit odd that we would ship any code that does not work, it appears to have been our policy for some time.. Therefore, we should carry forward our practice, and if the only issue

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-5822: keep user-added sshkeys ...

Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1044#issuecomment-154707648 Makes sense and looks good, but I am surprised you are still using these scripts instead of cloud-init. On the same note, worth having a look at how cloud-init beh

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

As requested by Boris, I’ll extend the vote until the end of today CET (instead of 4pm CET), that’s 8 extra hours. Anyone else actively testing? Regards, Remi From: Remi Bergsma mailto:rberg...@schubergphilis.com>> Date: Wednesday 4 November 2015 15:55 To: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9040: Use Tomcat6 for Debian p...

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1040#issuecomment-154696528 LGTM, maybe we jump to the latest tomcat in our next release --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub

Re: [RFC] Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Since we're still at it, does the current metrics view show total virtual core count per host (perhaps vs real core count)? Is this something we could have? -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - > From: "Nux!" > To: dev@cloudstack.a

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user NuxRo commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154692467 yeah baby! --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154692284 @wido I've included instance count on the host view page now @NuxRo the container width has been increased by 200px now, no more horizontal scrolls and more wid

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user bhaisaab commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154692200 @DaanHoogland I build the branch today from scratch, it seems to be working for me; see the screenshot: ![screenshot from 2015-11-07 12-58-34](https://clo

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-5822: keep user-added sshkeys ...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1044#issuecomment-154691168 makes sense and looks good. @ustcweizhou I assume you have tested this in production already, no? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: Metrics views for CloudStack UI

Github user DaanHoogland commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1038#issuecomment-154690287 @bhaisaab haven't got it working yet. I am trying as admin. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on Git

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: [4.5] CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix miss...

GitHub user resmo opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1045 [4.5] CLOUDSTACK-9042: VR: DHCP: fix missing DHCP host enties in /etc/dhcpentries.txt we had: 02:00:1e:07:01:53,set:10_102_92_5,10.102.92.5,songlog-1,infinite 02:00:0b:a2:00:3d,set:10

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8485: listAPIs are taking too ...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r44210903 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseGsonHelper.java --- @@ -71,4 +83,19 @@ public boolean shouldSkipField(FieldAttributes f) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-8485: listAPIs are taking too ...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1021#discussion_r44210897 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/ApiResponseGsonHelper.java --- @@ -71,4 +83,19 @@ public boolean shouldSkipField(FieldAttributes f) {

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9039: Fix paths for logging Ub...

Github user DaanHoogland commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1039#discussion_r44210798 --- Diff: python/lib/cloudutils/serviceConfig.py --- @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ def configration(self): except: logging.debug(fo

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

Hi Paul, We all agree user experience is important, because without users it would make no sense in spending all this time and energy in this project anyway. When I look at user experience, I see two parts: installing CloudStack and the CloudStack product itself. If we separate the two, we see

Re: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

+1 (Binding) I can confirm that Paul has an issue but it is in the centos7 install which is know, not new, and should have been fixed but can be overcome by experienced operators. The spec file is not good and should be fixed more then it had recently. The version installed with this failing inst

RE: [VOTE] Apache CloudStack 4.6.0

I'd like to understand how separating packaging would work, before commenting. I can't stress strongly enough how important the initial install experience is to the uptake to CloudStack. If the first output from CloudStack a new user sees in an error then it will not inspire confidence - it wi