Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3381

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Bharat Kumar
Thanks for the info Will. I also faced a similar problem. I will get back to you if i see any further issues. Thanks, Bharat. > On 04-Mar-2016, at 10:12 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > > Awesome, thanks for the update Bharat, that is great progress. > > If you need a hand with the posting back to th

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Will Stevens
Awesome, thanks for the update Bharat, that is great progress. If you need a hand with the posting back to the pull requests on github, just let me know, I have that piece working. My implementation is a cross platform binary without any dependencies so it could be easy to integrate if that would

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Bharat Kumar
Hi will, we have a solution to post the results to the community by email. We also have a github integration to fetch the Prs , run tests against them and post the consolidated results by email and share the logs using dropbox. We are facing some setup delays to get this up and running. I am sur

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3380

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Will Stevens
Last I knew Bharat did not have a solution for posting results back to the community. I could be wrong though, I don't really know how complete a solution Bharat has at this point. There are two other CI implementations in various states of completeness and I think it is important to have a common

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Gandikota Srinivas
Will, I guess Bharat has something similar in working. Bharat, Can you please elaborate your approach for sharing the CI results with community ? Thanks, Srinivas On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Will Stevens wrote: > Apparently attached files don't work when sending to the mailing list. > > Fi

Re: [PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Will Stevens
Apparently attached files don't work when sending to the mailing list. Find the screenshot here: https://objects-east.cloud.ca/v1/5ef827605f884961b94881e928e7a250/swill/Screen%20Shot%202016-03-03%20at%207.53.42%20PM.png On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 7:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote: > Hey Everyone, > As I

[PROPOSAL] Minimum Viable CI Integration

2016-03-03 Thread Will Stevens
Hey Everyone, As I am sure most of you are aware, I have been focusing a lot on ways to get CI integrated back into the community. Today I build a little POC to validate some ideas and get a feel for a potential approach for getting CI integrated into the Github pull request workflow. There are m

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3379

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28689 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9298: Improve performance of r...

2016-03-03 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#discussion_r54969574 --- Diff: server/test/com/cloud/api/query/dao/GenericDaoBaseWithTagInformationBaseTest.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,59 @@ +// Licensed to the Apach

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9298: Improve performance of r...

2016-03-03 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#discussion_r54964238 --- Diff: server/src/com/cloud/api/query/dao/GenericDaoBaseWithTagInformation.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +// Licensed to the Apache Software

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3378

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request: CLOUDSTACK-9298: Improve performance of r...

2016-03-03 Thread nvazquez
Github user nvazquez commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1425#issuecomment-191930272 @rafaelweingartner @pedro-martins I followed your suggestions and made a big refactor, hope this would be better now. I'm planning to run integration tests and pos

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3377

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3376

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

2016-03-03 Thread Koushik Das
Hi Rohit, Host maintenance is already there to address the use cases mentioned. What additional value would this feature add? Also if it is just providing the IPMI based operations then it is only limited to the hosts already added to CS, what about new hosts not added in CS? What if host IP/n

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

2016-03-03 Thread Will Stevens
Maybe I am not understanding something here. Does this control the power cycle of the management server(s) or the hypervisor hosts? The wording is throwing me off. I am guessing it is for managing the hypervisor hosts. If this is the case, does it also handle the "maintenance mode" for the host

LDAP auth failures

2016-03-03 Thread Rene Moser
We are experiencing authentication issues with LDAP since upgrade to 4.5.1. After some time (...), users can not authenticate anymore, however, authentication in other services using ldap works during this time. The issue is only related to cloudstack login it seems. We haven't found the root cau

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3375

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

2016-03-03 Thread Erik Weber
Sounds like a decent addition to me, +1 -- Erik On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote: > Hi all, > > I want to propose this new feature for CloudStack, to support out-of-band > management for CloudStack. > > In practice, most hosts have a out-of-band management such as iLO or iDRA

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

2016-03-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi Wido, The feature does not assumption IPv4 or IPv6, it’s upto the driver and the address you provide. Presently, the driver simply forks out a ipmitool process with a bunch of validated arguments. So, if the driver can reach to the specified address/port (address can be a fqdn, ipv4 or ipv6

Re: [DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

2016-03-03 Thread Wido den Hollander
Short note (on tablet), please make sure it supports IPv6 :) We at PCextreme manage our IPMI for example over IPv6 only. Wido > Op 3 mrt. 2016 om 11:43 heeft Rohit Yadav het > volgende geschreven: > > Hi all, > > I want to propose this new feature for CloudStack, to support out-of-band > ma

[DISCUSS] Request for comments: Out-of-band Management for CloudStack (new feature)

2016-03-03 Thread Rohit Yadav
Hi all, I want to propose this new feature for CloudStack, to support out-of-band management for CloudStack. In practice, most hosts have a out-of-band management such as iLO or iDRAC (that can support IPMI 2.0 for example). The idea is to allow admins to access this out-of-band management int

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm64-master #766

2016-03-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
Rajesh or anybody else involved, The systemvm build job in buildacloud keeps failing trying to connect to an old user directory. Does anybody know why this dir is used? Is there a stock hv-kvp-daemon_3.1_amd64.deb we can use instead? On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 10:23 AM, wrote: > See

Build failed in Jenkins: build-systemvm64-master #766

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 3372 lines...] 100% [Working] 100% [Packages 28.5 MB] 100% [Packages 28.5 MB] 100% [Working]

Build failed in Jenkins: build-master-slowbuild #3374

2016-03-03 Thread jenkins
See -- [...truncated 28679 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:findbugs (findbugs) @ cloud-quickcloud --- [INFO] [INFO] <<< findbugs-maven-plugin:3.0.1:check (cloudstack

Re: 4.9 Release Management

2016-03-03 Thread Daan Hoogland
People, I agree that CI is an important issue and I thank Will for taking owner ship. Will: Thank you. I will keep watching the builds.apache.org part of it and hammer on new or old :/s findbugs issues that come up. 4.9 and CI are not related directly. CI would be related to release process and no