Hi Rohit,
same question as Rene has posted, impact on older releases – will have issues
on older releases. I know that the older releases have marvin code which can
be used. Also, this will require changes on the CI side to pull the correct
repo for Marvin.
+1, if Bharat can modify CI imp
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
### CI RESULTS
```
Tests Run: 85
Skipped: 0
Failed: 0
Errors: 0
Duration: 4h 03m 22s
```
**Associated Uploads**
**`/tm
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1594
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1583
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Hello,
Could anyone summarise the state of S3 (and clones) for secondary storage?
I read at some point that it's the only secondary storage type supported
inter-zone, so it would appeal from a DR pov, but not sure how mature it is or
if there are any serious gotchas involved.
Thanks
Lucian
--
Hi Rohit,
what are we trying to achieve by moving marvin into a separate repo.?
--Bharat.
From: Raja Pullela
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2016 5:30:20 PM
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Split Marvin to its own repository
Hi Rohit,
same question
Thanks Rajani! That worked.
-Syed
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Rajani Karuturi wrote:
> Try changing in
> client/pom.xmlhttps://
> github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/client/pom.xml#L459
> ~ Rajanihttp://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
> On July 19, 2016 at 1:11 AM, Syed Mushtaq
> (syed1
> Op 19 juli 2016 om 14:38 schreef Nux! :
>
>
> Hello,
>
> Could anyone summarise the state of S3 (and clones) for secondary storage?
> I read at some point that it's the only secondary storage type supported
> inter-zone, so it would appeal from a DR pov, but not sure how mature it is
> or i
We are using Swift as secondary storage. It also offers inter-zone
secondary storage. We have had to do fixes to make it work correctly, but
we have pushed those fixes upstream so they are available in 4.9 (and some
fixes earlier than that).
Like Wido said, the staging NFS is still needed which
As Will put it, the implementation for using Object store as secondary
storage relies on using Staging NFS. You would also loose the functionality
to do differential snapshots. All your snapshots will basically be full
volume snapshots. So, if you have a lot of snapshots being taken at
scheduled in
Also I would +1 this, although my vote is non-binding :)
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> I believe it will make CI much smoother. Right now marvin is tied to the
> Cloudstack repo which was fine if all the integration tests were running
> from Cloudstack build but we are no
I believe it will make CI much smoother. Right now marvin is tied to the
Cloudstack repo which was fine if all the integration tests were running
from Cloudstack build but we are now seeing much better CI approaches with
bubble and Trillian and having marvin in its own repo will facilitate that
eve
Hi Paul,
Each integration test in general probes three things - the API, the DB and
remote server/host (using a ssh client). APIs are assumed to be strictly
backward compatible so any test that tests an API should be backward compatible
with previous CloudStack versions. Though, each CloudStac
Hi Rene and Raja,
In general, the core Marvin library has not changed since at least 4.5. The
only difference across all Marvin/cloudstack version is the contents in
marvin/marvin/cloudstackAPI directory i.e. the API cmd and response classes.
This has been solved by using runtime auto-generati
So how would the different versions of Marvin be tracked and how would the
versions be associated with the supported ACS versions?
Because the ACS API changes, a Marvin version will only support a specific
set of ACS versions. We need to understand how that will work because this
is bound to caus
Thanks Syed, you've answered it well. Bharat, what Syed has described captures
the goal behind this effort.
I see the pros and cons with keeping Marvin within the repo, and if there is a
hesitation with splitting Marvin -- I propose another alternative:
1. Along with cloudstack deb/rpm packag
@Rohit: I think that the assumption that the API is always backwards
compatible is dangerous as we know that in practice it is not always the
case.
For example: In ACS 4.6 the `restartVPC` introduced a new parameter called
`makeredundant`. Unfortunately, the default value for this parameter (if
y
Hi Will,
I understand your concerns, the goal with this initiative is to make sure that
Marvin would remain forward compatible with future versions. As for the past
releases/versions, we cannot guarantee backward compatibility.
My main goal was to solve and make it easier for CI systems to co
I think your alternatives makes sense.
Since we are always merging into and testing 3 different branches (4.7,
4.8, and master in the case of the 4.9 release), we are opening ourselves
to headaches IMHO. I don't think we can expect that the same Marvin
install will ALWAYS work on all three branch
Thanks for your input guys.
I think I'll stay with NFS for now after your replies, but it'd be pretty sweet
the day when we'll be having region wide secondary storage.
I'll need to think of another way to provide DR, perhaps some automatic
snapshot+download of sorts.
Lucian
--
Sent from the D
Is there a reason why NFS cannot be region-wide?
-Syed
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Nux! wrote:
> Thanks for your input guys.
>
> I think I'll stay with NFS for now after your replies, but it'd be pretty
> sweet the day when we'll be having region wide secondary storage.
>
> I'll need to th
Probably because ACS does not treat it as region wide, unlike the object
storage implementations.
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Syed Ahmed wro
Right, but is that an artificial limitation imposed by Cloudstack of is
there something that will break if we make NFS region wide? If not, we can
look at moving the NFS to a region wide storage.
-Syed
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 3:54 PM, Will Stevens wrote:
> Probably because ACS does not treat it
Oh ya. Gotta love NFS syncing to servers halfway around the world. :P
*Will STEVENS*
Lead Developer
*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *|* Quebec *|* H3J 1S6
w cloudops.com *|* tw @CloudOps_
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> Right, but is that
Glusterfs ;)
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
On 19 July 2016 21:24:45 BST, Will Stevens wrote:
>Oh ya. Gotta love NFS syncing to servers halfway around the world. :P
>
>*Will STEVENS*
>Lead Developer
>
>*CloudOps* *| *Cloud Solutions Experts
>420 rue Guy *|* Montreal *
Thank you for voting and for your feedback.
Based on the discussion on this thread, I'm calling off the voting. I'll send a
PR to add two new deb/rpm packages from 4.9/master, that will allow anyone to
install Marvin and integration-tests, which will also make it easier for CI
systems to insta
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1599
The initiative to split marvin into its own repository has been dropped for
now. Meanwhile, this PR can still be accepted as it fixed the code-generator to
work against the api discovery. I'll sen
GitHub user bugoff opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-docs-install/pull/27
make sure we use the same nfs paths. /primary vs /mnt/primary
make sure we use the same nfs paths. /primary vs /mnt/primary on the next
page.
You can merge this pull request into a
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
packaging: Marvin and integration-tests packages
This introduces two new cloudstack packages: marvin and integration-tests.
The two packages will make it easier for CI systems to install Marvi
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1612
@rohit is it worth putting into straight into the apachecloudstack repo
(rather than apache/cloudstack).
Kind regards,
Paul Angus
VP Technology
30 matches
Mail list logo
