On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Marty Godsey wrote:
> Should there be any issues running XS7 with CS 4.8?
>
>
Most likely, yes. There are some major changes with the OS in XS7 that is
likely to break.
I think there are some efforts from Accelerite to fix it, but I don't know
the status.
--
Er
Personally, I think the most flexible way is if you have a developer write a
storage-pool allocator to customize the placement of virtual disks as you see
fit.
You extend the StoragePoolAllocator class, write your logic, and update a
config file so that Spring is aware of the new allocator and
So what would be the best way to do it? I use templates to make it simple for
my users so that the Xen tools are already installed as an example.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
From: Yiping Zhang [mailto:yzh...@marketo.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 8, 2016 7:55 PM
To: dev@clo
Well, using tags leads to proliferation of templates or service offerings etc.
It is not very scalable and gets out of hand very quickly.
Yiping
On 9/8/16, 4:25 PM, "Marty Godsey" wrote:
I do this by using storage tags. As an example I have some templates that
are either created on SSD or
I do this by using storage tags. As an example I have some templates that are
either created on SSD or magnetic storage. The template has a storage tag
associated with it and then I assigned the appropriate storage tag to the
primary storage.
Regards,
Marty Godsey
-Original Message-
Fr
If one doesn't already exist, you can write a custom storage allocator to
handle this scenario.
> On Sep 8, 2016, at 4:25 PM, Yiping Zhang wrote:
>
> Hi, Devs:
>
> We all know how (anti)-host affinity group works in CloudStack, I am
> wondering if there is a similar concept for (anti)-stora
Hi, Devs:
We all know how (anti)-host affinity group works in CloudStack, I am wondering
if there is a similar concept for (anti)-storage affinity group?
The use case is as this: in a setup with just one (somewhat) unreliable
primary storage, if the primary storage is off line, then all VM i
Github user swill commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1658
Can we get another code review of this PR so we can get this merged so I
can submit PRs to include the doc generation scripts to the docs repos which
depend on this functionality?
---
If your pr
Is anyone planning to represent CloudStack at ApacheCon in Seville?
Cheers,
Will
Hey All,
I will be working on the report for the Apache meeting later this month.
It needs to be submitted by EOD tomorrow.
Please respond with anything you would like included in the report.
Some items I plan to cover:
- Why is the Github repository move stalled?
- 4.9.0 is out...
- Introducing
Well it works properly, just not the way people expect. The purpose of that
dashboard is to highlight the
cluster
which is most likely to need capacity changes when doing capacity planning.
Unfortunately CloudPlatform is behind CloudStack on these features. In
CloudPlatform it is not possible
11 matches
Mail list logo
