[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1642: System VMs on Managed Storage

2016-09-10 Thread mike-tutkowski
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1642 @syed @rhtyd @jburwell I have provided new integration tests for this PR. Also, I have run the following tests (all successfully): TestVolumes.py (both with and without Xe

Re: storage affinity groups

2016-09-10 Thread Yiping Zhang
Yes, we are currently considering creating multiple clusters. The downside of this approach is we need many more hosts. Yiping On 9/9/16, 4:05 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote: Why not just use different primary storage per cluster. You then can control your storage failure domains on a cluster

Re: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode

2016-09-10 Thread Tutkowski, Mike
Is your issue similar to this one? https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9144 From: ned dogg Sent: Saturday, September 10, 2016 1:24 PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode Hi Everybody, I'm a n

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1660: CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Bug in SshHelper affectin...

2016-09-10 Thread jburwell
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660 @serg38 I will be going through other PRs tomorrow that are due for merge. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If you

[GitHub] cloudstack pull request #1660: CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Bug in SshHelper a...

2016-09-10 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1660: CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Bug in SshHelper affectin...

2016-09-10 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660 @jburwell Thanks a lot. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wis

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1660: CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Bug in SshHelper affectin...

2016-09-10 Thread jburwell
Github user jburwell commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660 @rafaelweingartner @serg38 is correct. Any committer may merge a PR so long as the following conditions are met: * At least 1 code review LGTM * At least 1 test LGTM *

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1660: CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Bug in SshHelper affectin...

2016-09-10 Thread serg38
Github user serg38 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660 @rafaelweingartner . Thanks. I believe per current process any committer can merge PRs as per below. We have so many PRs in merge ready state Github user jburwell commented on the

RE: System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode

2016-09-10 Thread Simon Weller
Hi, Can you tell us more about your environment? What hypervisor are you using? Is this a basic or advanced zone? Simon Weller/ENA (615) 312-6068 -Original Message- From: ned dogg [neddog...@gmail.com] Received: Saturday, 10 Sep 2016, 2:24PM To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org [dev@cloudsta

System VM's are getting stuck in starting mode

2016-09-10 Thread ned dogg
Hi Everybody, I'm a newbie on cloudstack. I started playing with this technology. For that I install both the management -server and the agent. I was able to install and start them properly but I unable to create any instance. When I click on instance the menu then I click on add instance and nex

[GitHub] cloudstack issue #1660: CLOUDSTACK-9470: [BLOCKER] Bug in SshHelper affectin...

2016-09-10 Thread rafaelweingartner
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1660 @serg38 I do not know how it is working right now this process; but, I recall seeing an email saying that only RMs would be allowed to merge now. I might be mistaken, I had lost track