Github user murali-reddy closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1750
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-330)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 23096 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1706
@murali-reddy should we merge #1659 and then re-base this PR before running
more tests?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Hi All,
I was setting up a new cloudstack installation from source and I ran into a
weird issue. I cannot seem to be able to add a NFS primary storage from the
UI. It asks me to provide a URL but that field is reserved only for managed
storage.
Anyone else face this issue?
Kaushik,
I believe that was an evironmental issue. I am setting up my cloudstack
again on a different server. If I run into this problem again. I will
report back.
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Koushik Das
wrote:
> Please share the code/PR if possible.
>
> From: Syed Ahmed
> Reply-To: "dev@c
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Trillian test result (tid-324)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 40939 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-323)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 39606 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-321)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 6
Total time taken: 35300 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoran
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1706
Trillian test result (tid-315)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36714 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
@PaulAngus @jburwell This PR is looking good now. Can we re-run the tests
with this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-322)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28341 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1750
Trillian test result (tid-319)
Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33284 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
Trillian test result (tid-320)
Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28892 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Trillian test result (tid-317)
Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 31212 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd @PaulAngus Can we re-run test again to see if it was one time issue?
On a general note it would be extremely helpful that during blueorangutain runs
we rotate management server log before
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1578
@jburwell @rhtyd We were able to successfully run the failing test
"test_01_create_template" on our kvm-centos7 environment with this PR build
after dealing with the issue on ACS-KVM agen
GitHub user yvsubhash opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1756
CLOUDSTACK-9585 UI doesn't give an option to select the xentools version
UI doesn't give an option to select the xentools version while registering
template for any user other than ROOT admin
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1750
Trillian test result (tid-316)
Environment: kvm-centos6 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28592 seconds
Marvin logs:
https://github.com/blueoranguta
Github user syed closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
GitHub user syed reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1711
XenServer 7 Support
This PR adds support for XenServer 7. I have manually done the following
tests
- Create a new cluster with XenServer7
- Add Primary storage: Should create an SR on XS
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@mike-tutkowski I believe you are right. I don't see how the errors would
call the managed storage. In any case, I am setting up my new environment with
SolidFire today. I will run this PR and repo
Hi!
We're recently hit by some gateway problems. In an 4.9 advanced zone,
shared network, a virtualrouter vm does dns and dhcp.
This router vm sometimes offers itself as default gateway.
I tried to trace this down, but I can't find the real problem.
Anyway, in /etc/dnsmasq.conf all entries are cor
Github user jburwell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1750
@murali-reddy could you please update the commit message/pull request
description to describe the motivation for this change and the benefits it
provides? Also, this fix would be useful for 4.
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1755
CLOUDSTACK-9584: run component tests in Travis run
This would run additional component tests in Travis run.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
GitHub user rhtyd reopened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[4.9] Latest health test run
Dummy PR to trigger tests on latest 4.9 branch
@blueorangutan package
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull htt
Github user rhtyd closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1745
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-159
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user marcaurele commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1730#discussion_r87170352
--- Diff:
engine/schema/src/com/cloud/storage/dao/VMTemplateZoneDaoImpl.java ---
@@ -84,14 +84,11 @@ public VMTemplateZoneVO findByZoneTemplate(long z
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-157
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-158
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-156
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Hi,
I meant some development in cloudstack to add new nic when add new ip
range. it is not easy.
You can have multiple shared networks untagged. As far as I see, the shared
networks can also have same vlan but with different subnets. I suggest you
to test this solution.
-Wei
2016-11-09 4:24 GM
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1745
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1745
@jburwell I'm running tests on 4.8+ branches to see what tests may have
regressed on these branches.
PR #1752 - 4.8
PR #1753 - 4.9
PR #1754 - 4.10
@blueorangutan package
-
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
[4.10] Latest health test run
Dummy PR to run trillian tests on latest master (4.10-snapshot).
@blueorangutan package
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
[4.9] Latest health test run
Dummy PR to trigger tests on latest 4.9 branch
@blueorangutan package
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
[4.8] Latest health test run
Dummy PR to trigger tests on 4.8 branch
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack 4.8-
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Storage from above test run has been cleaned up, however:
Permissions look fine in general, but i note that mgmt server created files
(ie systemvm.iso) are created as user 996 which i
Github user PaulAngus commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
I'll have a look, but seems unlikely, given the scope of the changes
'storage' and that this is the only this PR having a problem...
+ isn't:
/var/cloudstack/mnt/VM/6814905206562.c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1751
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1751
Thanks @murali-reddy. Since changes are limited to just the systemd file
with manual testing confirming the fix, I'll proceed with merging this and
start separate PRs to run tests against kvm/xens
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1751
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1751
LGTM, manual test run okay. Agent ran-okay after applying the semi-colon
fix.
Before the fix, the failure observed was:
â cloudstack-agent.service - CloudStack Agent
Load
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1751
systemd: Fix semicolon missing in b75e69
While forward merging PR #1728, and resolving merge issues a semi-colon was
not added causing cloudstack-agent to fail to start. This fixes the
iss
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1706
@jburwell #1659 has a fix which complements this patch.Basically when first
IP is associated with an interface routing table is created and should be
deleted when last IP associated is remo
57 matches
Mail list logo
