Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1760
@marcaurele an upgrade path such as `Upgrade4910to4920` would only work if
your destination/final version is 4.9.2.0, have a look at the db upgrade
checker workflow and you'll see how to trigger
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1738
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
@LGTM on code review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1470
@remibergsma can you address comments from @jburwell, especially remove the
`new String()`. I can help with further reviewing and testing once code changes
are finalized, thanks.
---
If your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
@murali-reddy @abhinandanprateek ping, please review this one as well,
thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1573
@nitt10prashant can you rebase against 4.9, change the base branch for the
PR to 4.9. Thanks. /cc @jburwell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1606
LGTM on tests and code review.
@leprechau @kiwiflyer can we have a JIRA id for this and use that in the
commit summary.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
@abhinandanprateek @murali-reddy and others -- can we have review on this,
thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765#discussion_r89574062
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -100,36 +100,25
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
@nvazquez can you look at comments from @koushik-das @serg38 do we have
lgtms on this one?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@mike-tutkowski please get a JIRA id for this and use it in the commit
summary, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@mike-tutkowski please get a JIRA if for this and use that in the commit
summary, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-433)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 45986 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1759
Move this to 4.9 or master branch.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@murali-reddy @abhinandanprateek @jburwell pinging for review continuation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1760
@rhtyd The DB update class for the DatabaseUpgradeChecker doesn't work on
Travis. Is there something I'm doing wrong, or missed something?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1738
Thanks all, I'll proceed with the merging as build, travis and packaging
works, without an explicit Trillian test or BVT as both don't run tests against
baremetal and the change is a single line
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
Test LGTM, the two failures are intermittent and env related.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1738
LGTM as well
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1781
@jayapalu we had the same issue before. we changed the code in line 634
from setIsReduntant to setIsRedundant to fix it.
```
diff --git
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1778
@nitin-maharana so I suggest to use "networkId" instead of nicId, it is
simpler change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/827
@yvsubhash yes, we will miss some records if we skip the exception, but we
will miss all others records if we stop the usage server. For me, it is
important that usage server will still be
Github user koushik-das commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1738
Code changes LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1781
CLOUDSTACK-9612: Fixed issue in restarting redundant network with cleâ¦
Rvr Network which is updated from the isolated network is failed to restart
with cleanup set.
This is
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@rafaelweingartner Tried tracing where deadlock 5 originated. It seems
both transactions are part of the same method fetchNewPublicIp in
IpAddressManagerImpl . Transactions are executed on
Github user yvsubhash commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/827
@ustcweizhou In case we continue with usage generation, we may miss out
some of the records which actually resulted in exception and would in turn lead
to wrong usage numbers. stopping after
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1778
@ustcweizhou : Yes, we can directly pass networkid instead nicId. They
handled the same way in case of multiple vm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-432)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33969 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1769
Changes look good to me, but waiting for @pdion891 to tell us more :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1780
These small fixes *can* be very dangerous. So wondering how we can test
this easily.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@rafaelweingartner Looks like the deadlocks 2 and 3 are the same. I
scanned our production log and since last December we had 6400 deadlocks. Out
of them close to 6000 were Deadlock 1
20
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
@rhtyd I have resolved all your comments and updated the PR. Moreover, all
the tests that are run on this PR are now fully successful (blueorangutan tests
+ added Marvin tests in this
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
Thanks, @serg38.
Looking at the SQLs you posted. We could start to discuss whether or not
some SQLs statements need locking transactions.
Ignoring Deadlocks 3 and 4 for
Github user prashanthvarma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580#discussion_r89540443
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py ---
@@ -3377,6 +3377,40 @@ def list(cls, apiclient, **kwargs):
cmd.listall = True
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735
Trillian test result (tid-426)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36018 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
@rhtyd Here are the latest test results of the added Marvin tests that test
the changes in this PR.
1) Marvin test run:
nosetests --with-marvin --marvin-config=nuage.cfg
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-251
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-250
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-249
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
Trillian test result (tid-427)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28223 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
Here it is few samples of deadlocks we observe in high transaction volume
environment with multiple management servers. As you can see most of them are
concurrent operations from different
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1604
Trillian test result (tid-425)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 35008 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Thanks @nvazquez @serg38 -- they could be env related. I'll check again
tomorrow, kick some tests now.
Thanks @mike-tutkowski - happy thanksgiving to you and everyone in the
community
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@serg38 I have just now started reading this PR (excuse me if I overlooked
some information).
> If we are to try to implement a general way of dealing with deadlocks in
ACS
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580#discussion_r89534499
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py ---
@@ -3377,6 +3377,40 @@ def list(cls, apiclient, **kwargs):
cmd.listall = True
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
LGTM, the tests are all good as one (one failure was due to cleanup in the
create template test case and was env related). Based on this I'm merging this.
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545#discussion_r89533059
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtDomainXMLParser.java
---
@@ -175,6 +180,26 @@ public boolean
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
@ustcweizhou @ozhanrk can you check snapshot and volume related errors in
the last test runs above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710#discussion_r89532748
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -268,7 +268,9 @@ public boolean
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1737
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Trillian test result (tid-418)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36313 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1737
Tests LGTM, some failures are known intermittent issues.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
Trillian test result (tid-417)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 36680 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@rafaelweingartner @swill @wido @koushik-das @karuturi @rhtyd @jburwell
Let's ask a different question. If we are to try to implement a general way of
dealing with deadlocks in ACS how could it
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1737
Trillian test result (tid-424)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 29573 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Trillian test result (tid-419)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32311 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1545
Trillian test result (tid-421)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 29503 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Hi Rohit,
Today is a holiday in the US and many people are also off work tomorrow.
I have a bunch of holiday-related activities going on today and tomorrow,
but should
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
Trillian test result (tid-423)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27940 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577
Trillian test result (tid-422)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27764 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1623
Trillian test result (tid-420)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 28011 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd adding to @serg38's comment, in test_06_download_detached_volume
extractVolumeCmd fails with this error:
`Invalid state of the volume with specified ID. It should be either
detached
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
Trillian test result (tid-416)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 27983 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1735
@jburwell @rhtyd sorry I've been off yesterday, do I push force to kick
tests again?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
@parthj If the templates are displayed on UI, is that actions we can do on
them? eg, delete template.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1778
@nitin-maharana Hi Nitin, can we use "networkId: network.id" instead nicId ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user pdion891 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1769
Could you look if it conflict with #1435 ? Because I made a pull request
to automatically increment version in docker file when changing release of
master via
GitHub user ppenchev-storpool opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1780
Fix the KVM hypervisor's handling of not-really-SCSI devices.
Hi,
Thanks for developing and maintaining CloudStack!
What do you think about the attached trivial
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1320
Thanks @nitin-maharana
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577
@rhtyd I am afraid, the newly added integration test takes well beyond 20
mins (Ran 4 tests in 6729.698s in the previous run, refer earlier comments for
more details) to run all its
GitHub user priyankparihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1779
CLOUDSTACK-9610: Disabled Host Keeps Being up status after unmanaging â¦
Disabled Host Keeps Being up status after unmanaging cluster.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user nitin-maharana opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1778
CLOUDSTACK-9613: Unable to set NAT rules on any interfaces except first
interface of VM.
Description:
=
VMs have multiple network interfaces.
It is not possible to
GitHub user priyankparihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1777
clearCLOUDSTACK-9133: Two volume.delete usage events are getting
generatedâ¦
⦠for destoy vm.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user priyankparihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1776
CLOUDSTACK-9603: concurrent.snapshots.threshold.perhost does not valiâ¦
concurrent.snapshots.threshold.perhost does not validate value given
You can merge this pull request into a Git
GitHub user priyankparihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1775
CLOUDSTACK-9606: While IP address is released, tag are not deleted.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
GitHub user priyankparihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1774
CLOUDSTACK-9608: Errored State and Abandoned state Templates are not â¦
Errored State and Abandoned state Templates are not displayed on UI.
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user prashanthvarma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580#discussion_r89472040
--- Diff: client/tomcatconf/commands.properties.in ---
@@ -0,0 +1,804 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
---
Github user prashanthvarma commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580#discussion_r89471555
--- Diff: tools/marvin/marvin/lib/base.py ---
@@ -3377,6 +3377,40 @@ def list(cls, apiclient, **kwargs):
cmd.listall = True
GitHub user priyankparihar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1773
CLOUDSTACK-9607: Preventing template deletion when template is in use.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull
Github user abhinandanprateek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
Even trying the full transaction again could be problematic as there might
be checks done before firing the transaction that may not be valid now.
The thing is it may mostly work,
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1320
@rhtyd : I discussed with @sateesh-chodapuneedi regarding this. I will give
my changes to him. He will include my commit in his PR. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1320
@nitin-maharana the feature is related, and exclusive; in that case please
move your changes to PR #1664
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1635
Checked centos6 failed due to an intermittent unit test failure, we can
ignore that for now.
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user nitin-maharana commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1320
@rhtyd: This is dependent on #1664, Once #1664 gets merged, I will make a
new PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-247
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-246
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo
