Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@serg38 thanks, I'll bisect them today.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@mike-tutkowski can you use the JIRA id in the commit summary as:
`CLOUDSTACK-: one-line summary
... rest of the commit message...
`
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Thanks @mike-tutkowski can you add a JIRA id for this, and use that id in
the commit summary?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd @jburwell I recently ran all of the managed-storage-related
integration tests successfully (referenced above).
I think we're in a good position to get this into 4.10 now.
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1748
@rhtyd I added that JIRA ticket and referenced it in the PR description.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd I added that JIRA ticket and referenced it in the PR description.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd Only 2 PRs were merged in the interval between last successful run
and failure: PR1766 and PR1545
1766 was merged to 4.8 and was hypervisor agnostic so all points at PR1545
'Add
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
TestAddRemoveHosts (1, 2, and 4 were successful and 3 failed for an
environmental reason):
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/613869/results.txt)
Github user mike-tutkowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
TestVolumes (resign = true):
[results.txt](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/files/613863/results.txt)
TestVolumes (resign = false):
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@serg38 thanks, that's my opinion as well, I'll kick one more round just to
be sure, and will bisect recently merged changes and revert any changes if
necessary.
@blueorangutan test matrix
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1752
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-256
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-257
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-255
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd Both 4.9 and 4.10 now fail as well as PR based on 4.9 e.g. PR 1659
with 13 tests on KVM but PRs based on 4.8 succeed e.g. PR1710 and PR1753. Might
be some interference from one of the
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@rafaelweingartner I might be wrong but 2d came from
findAndUpdateDirectAgentToLoad in HostDaoImpl which also creates a large
transaction.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@serg38 Likely environment related, I'll check that /cc @PaulAngus
Meanwhile I'll kick another round.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
Trillian test result (tid-438)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34149 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Trillian test result (tid-440)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 33701 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
Trillian test result (tid-439)
Environment: xenserver-65sp1 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 32353 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@rafaelweingartner You might be right that pod_vlan_map should be in the
join. May be I didn't find the correct methods after all. @jburwell @rhtyd What
do you think?
I was able to find
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Trillian test result (tid-437)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34208 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd All the new failures are due to inability to SSH to VMs. Can we
re-run this to filter environmental issue or recent PR merge?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Trillian test result (tid-434)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 34325 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1780
@ppenchev-storpool I haven't worked with a non-iscsi adaptor for KVM but
wouldn't it change the default behaviour now for non-iscsi disks? What if the
other adaptors also ignore this? Can we add a
Github user cloudmonger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1781
### ACS CI BVT Run
**Sumarry:**
Build Number 141
Hypervisor xenserver
NetworkType Advanced
Passed=78
Failed=17
Skipped=7
_Link to logs Folder
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1733
Trillian test result (tid-436)
Environment: kvm-centos7 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 25816 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1775
can you please provide a description and steps to reproduce
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1777
Where is the other usage event generated? Does this only apply to ROOT
volumes?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user syed commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1779
Hi @priyankparihar,
Thanks for the patch. Can you provide a more descriptive message about the
bug and how this fix addresses that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user nvazquez commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1727
@rhtyd @koushik-das @serg38 thanks, I'll work on second option
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1785
LGTM
this PR solves the same issue as #1778
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user nitin-maharana opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1786
CLOUDSTACK-9618: Load Balancer configuration page does not have "Source"
method in the drop down list.
If we create an isolated network with NetScaler published service offering
for
Github user rafaelweingartner commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1762
@serg38 if that "AssignIpAddressFromPodVlanSearch" object was being used to
generate the SQL; should not we see a join with "pod_vlan_map" too? For me
this, this SC is very confusing.
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1785
@rhtyd This is a shadow of PR #1592 , rebased against 4.9 as requested.
Note: The original PR #1592 has enough LGTMs to merge this PR.
Once you merge this PR, I will
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1592
@rhtyd I had difficulties changing the base branch to 4.9 and re-basing
against 4.9 as the source branch on my fork is master (prashanthvarma:master).
Anyhow, I have opened a new
GitHub user prashanthvarma opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1785
CLOUDSTACK-9416 : Enabling Static NAT on an associated Public IP to one of
the NICs (networks) of a multi-NIC VM fails due to a wrong (default) Guest VM
IP being selected in the GUI
GitHub user abhinandanprateek opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1784
CS-505: Marvin test to VR DNS Service
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/shapeblue/cloudstack CS-505
Alternatively
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1760
right, I forgot about the match required with the version in the pom. I
thought I should prepare the stuff for the next 4.9.x release but that cannot
work unless the pom files are updated
Github user resmo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1769
I didn't test #1435 yet, but code looks good. The only difference I see is:
~~~
pip install cryptography --force-reinstall
~~~
And I used the mysql connector from MySQL.com but
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
@jayapalu line 179 should be changed as well, same to line 143
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user ustcweizhou commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1782
@jayapalu what about load balancer ports ? shall we consider it as well?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1783
CLOUDSTACK-9615: Fixd applying ingress rules without ports
When ingress rule is applied without ports (port start and port end params
are not passed) then API/UI is showing rule got applied
GitHub user jayapalu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1782
CLOUDSTACK-9617: Fixed enabling remote access after PF configured on â¦
Enabling Remote access Vpn Fails when there is a portforwarding rule of the
reserved ports ( 1701 , 500 , 4500) under
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + xenserver-65sp1) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@blueorangutan test centos7 xenserver-65sp1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-254
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-253
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user ppenchev-storpool commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1780
Hi,
Thanks for looking at this!
Testing this could simply be a matter of adding more than one storage
adaptor to a KVM storage pool, then connecting and disconnecting
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
@rhtyd @jburwell We will rebase this PR with the latest master asap, and
update you.
As mentioned in the previous comments, we wanted to merge this PR after
merging PR #1580 as
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577
@rhtyd @jburwell Thank you for reviewing and helping us merge this PR, much
appreciated !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user prashanthvarma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
@rhtyd @jburwell Thank you for reviewing and helping us merge this PR, much
appreciated !!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1659
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1765#discussion_r89576730
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/Xenserver625StorageProcessor.java
---
@@ -100,36 +100,25 @@ protected
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
There were some intermittent errors seen, I'll re-kick tests.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710#discussion_r89576049
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -268,7 +268,9 @@ public boolean
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1664
Thanks for sharing @sateesh-chodapuneedi
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1579
@nlivens @prashanthvarma @singalrahul please squash your changes, fix
conflicts, rebase against latest master. Pending lgtm/review is requested. /cc
@jburwell
---
If your project is set up for
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1577
LGTM. Few failures are related to env, merging this now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user ustcweizhou commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1710#discussion_r89575783
--- Diff:
engine/storage/snapshot/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/snapshot/XenserverSnapshotStrategy.java
---
@@ -268,7 +268,9 @@ public boolean
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1580
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
77 matches
Mail list logo
