Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1519
@dsclose #1659 is merged, so you can close this PR if you wish. Though
issue related to redundant VR fixed by commit d582358, bf285e1 in this PR are
not addressed by #1659, and still a
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-395
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/873
@karuturi can you make suggested changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
All,
Please proceed with testing this RC. I've kicked new tests to rule out
intermittent failures.
Hi Bobby,
I've tried to deploy a 4.5.2.2 based environment and upgraded to 4.9.1.0
without any upgrade failures. I'm using MySQL 5.7, can you share your MySQL
server version and other
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
Trillian test result (tid-677)
Environment: vmware-55u3 (x2), Advanced Networking with Mgmt server 7
Total time taken: 42942 seconds
Marvin logs:
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos6 mgmt + xs65sp1, centos7 mgmt
+ vmware55u3, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan test matrix
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-394
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-393
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1831
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1831
Based on 4.9.1.0 rc1 thread. Merging this on discretion.
Tested upgrade from 4.9.1.0-rc1 to master (4.10.0.0-SNAPSHOT) manually.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
GitHub user rhtyd opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1831
CLOUDSTACK-9671: Fix sql change to corresponding version paths
- Fixes issue of failing upgrade paths
- Moves schema changes from PR #1615 in the 4.9.1.0 to 4.10.0.0 sql path
You can merge
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1749
Ping where are we with this PR, @mike-tutkowski @syed @abhinandanprateek
@murali-reddy thanks.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Hi Bruno,
I checked the issue, the PR #1615 was merged only on master. Since, we've not
started release work for 4.10/master yet, I'll move the changes to appropriate
sql schema. This is not a blocker for either 4.8.2.0 or 4.9.1.0 as the
changes/feature don't exist on them yet.
Thanks again
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
@syed can you rebase against 4.9 and change PR's branch to 4.9? As soon as
4.9.1.0 is out, we'll work towards 4.9.2.0 and work towards the next minor
release to include several such bugfixes.
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1754
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1753
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
GitHub user pdube opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1830
CLOUDSTACK-9677: Adding storage policy support for swift as secondaryâ¦
⦠storage
Added support to use storage policies with swift
You can merge this pull request into a Git
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-392
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
@murali-reddy a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user murali-reddy commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
GitHub user syed opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
CLOUDSTACK-9363: Fix HVM VM restart bug in XenServer
Here is the longer description of the problem:
By default XenServer limits HVM guests to only 4 disks. Two of those are
reserved for
Github user sateesh-chodapuneedi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
Thanks, @serg38, @borisstoyanov for reviews.
@karuturi @rhtyd Can you pleas trigger trillian tests for validation?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Can you remove that column addition in the alter statement and see if the
upgrade continues?
Do you recall installing any customer version of ACS that may have included DB
schema patches?
From: Boris Stoyanov
Sent: Wednesday,
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
LGTM on code review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Hi,
We’ve currently have a plan for upgrade testing covering the following
scenarios:
I’ve tried upgrading from 4.5.2.2 to 4.9.1, but got the following exception:
2016-12-13 14:37:28,128 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.ScriptRunner] (main:null) (logid:) --
2016-12-13 14:37:28,128 DEBUG [c.c.u.d.ScriptRunner]
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/672
@jburwell those are fixing different bugs but all all needed to enable this
that's why they are kept as separate tickets.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
@jburwell Failed tests are not related to change in this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user anshul1886 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/669
@swill @jburwell Updated in according to newer changes in UI. Also moved
consoleKeyboardOptions to js file after jsp change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SudharmaJain commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1734
@jburwell I have added a Marvin test case to verify the fix.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
+1
Based on smoke test results [1] and below tests run manually on VMware
deployment
- VM life cycle operations
- network life cycle operations
- verified source NAT, static NAT, PF, LB, VPC internal LB, network ACL,
firewall
- upgrade from 4.9 and 4.5.2
IMO issue raised by Milamber
GitHub user sateesh-chodapuneedi opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1828
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a VM snapshot when
there are child VM snapshots
Jira
===
CLOUDSTACK-9676 Start instance fails after reverting to a
Hi All,
I can see we are restricting the edit of network offering for the shared
network. Can somebody through some light of the reason for that? The following
is the corresponding JIRA ticket
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-571
Thanks,
Subhash
DISCLAIMER
==
This
41 matches
Mail list logo