Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1880
The above tests failure are not related to this PR. These are failing most
for the other PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1282
@swill @rhtyd can you review?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1944
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1944
merging now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
@rhtyd can you check on the failures if they are related?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user karuturi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1889
@rashmidixit travis is failing. Can you rebase with master and force push?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110082664
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
---
@@ -1764,9 +1765,12 @@ protected ExecutionRe
Github user jayapalu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1908#discussion_r110082657
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/xenserver/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/xenserver/resource/CitrixResourceBase.java
---
@@ -625,15 +627,20 @@ protected Execut
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + vmware-55u3) has
been kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@blueorangutan test centos7 vmware-55u3
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
A quick update on RC2:
These are the current list of blockers.
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2022
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9849
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582
I am planning to close all the PRs by w
Thanks for updating RN. Release notes is something which we haven't looked
at till now.
Any update on the xen 7.1 PR?
~Rajani
http://cloudplatform.accelerite.com/
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Pierre-Luc Dion wrote:
> Look like we need a new systemvm named "systemvm-xenserver-4.10". t also
>
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2018
@wido
In the patch it can be observed that it is ("-A FIREWALL_%s DROP" % )
running without '-j' and it is not caught. There is duplicate rule due this the
impact is not seen.
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1864
Are you still working on this update Rohit? Or is there a new PR for
updating the SSVM to Debian 8?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2018
Can you explain a bit more why you are changing the iptable rules? As they
can break a lot of things by accident.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2024
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feat
GitHub user wido opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2028
CLOUDSTACK-9853: Add support for Secondary IPv6 Addresses and Subnets
This commit adds support for passing IPv6 Addresses and/or Subnets as
Secondary IPs.
This is groundwork for CLOUDS
Syed,
NetworkManager strikes again! ... I'll make sure it disappears from the
template. Darn ...
The centos user password as set by the kickstart is indeed "password" so the
template can be accessed should cloud-init fail.
I am not entirely at peace with this as could lead to security problems.
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
@rhtyd Please kick off VMware tests on this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user sureshanaparti commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1879
@nvazquez Updated the code for the issue reported. Can you please re-test?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
So I've opened a PR to fix this on the cloud-init side.
https://code.launchpad.net/~syed1/cloud-init/+git/cloud-init/+merge/322024
We need this because CentOS7 has NetworkManager as the default manager for
networking
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 11:41 AM, Syed Ahmed wrote:
> Hi Nux,
>
> So I'm still
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-620
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep
you posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@serg38 Got it, any idea when we'll get UI for this feature, I'd love to
see it.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Hi Nux,
So I'm still having trouble with the template :)
As per the configuration
http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/config/centos/centos7-vmware.cfg the
`centos` user gets the password set to as `password` but is never added to
the sudoers list. When does that happen? Also, From the cloud-init logs
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (centos7 mgmt + kvm-centos7) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950
@rhtyd a Trillian-Jenkins test job (ubuntu mgmt + kvm-ubuntu) has been
kicked to run smoke tests
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Thanks, guys!
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 8:22 AM, Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Mike, it seems issue with your axis dependency version. See and compare the
> axis and axis-jaxrpc dependency version from master branch. Install the f5
> dependency jars from here: https://github.com/rhtyd/cloudstack-nonoss an
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
@blueorangutan test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950
@blueorangutan test ubuntu kvm-ubuntu
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user serg38 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
@borisstoyanov Let's re-run vmware B.O test for this PR now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950
Packaging result: âcentos6 âcentos7 âdebian. JID-618
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2025
I think the issue caused it due to an additional `.0`, LGTM. This should
work.
@karuturi let's review and merge this blocker, thanks.
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is s
Mike, it seems issue with your axis dependency version. See and compare the
axis and axis-jaxrpc dependency version from master branch. Install the f5
dependency jars from here: https://github.com/rhtyd/cloudstack-nonoss and while
building ACS 4.5.x use JDK1.7.
Regards.
__
+1 in addition to my support for joining the experiment, I would also like us
to have the option to assign labels on the PRs. Such labels can be useful for
CIs and RMs to determine and merge PRs that are fully tested and blessed by
reviewers.
Regards.
rohit.y
+1 looking forward to this.
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: 05 April 2017 12:10:19
To: dev
Subject: [PROPOSAL] Apache Cloudstack should join the gitbox experiment
In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host
mirrors of Apache project on github with
Github user blueorangutan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950
@rhtyd a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. I'll keep you
posted as I make progress.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appe
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950
Thanks @ustcweizhou
@blueorangutan package
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this f
Github user rhtyd commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2024
LGTM. @abhinandanprateek should we retarget this PR to 4.9? Thanks.
@karuturi let's merge this before next 4.10 RC
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
+1
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host
> mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then just
> to the mirror-bot. For those projects committers can merge on github
> and put labels on PRs. I want
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2008
@olivierlemasle I think this PR needs at least 2 LGTMs and as agreed Rajani
is taking care of mergin PRs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
+1 this is something we have been working towards for a couple years now.
On Apr 5, 2017 2:40 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
> In the Apache foundation an experiment has been going on to host
> mirrors of Apache project on github with more write access then just
> to the mirror-bot. For those projec
Github user wido commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1950
LGTM for me
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
Github user olivierlemasle commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2008
The Travis tests have finally succeeded.
@borisstoyanov Any chance merging this pull request?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2027
@rhtyd the `NioTest` result is not consistent on my laptop and fails from
time to time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user kishankavala commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/874
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if t
GitHub user marcaurele opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2027
Activate NioTest following changes in CLOUDSTACK-9348 PR #1549
The first PR #1493 re-enabled the NioTest but not the new PR #1549.
@rhtyd the test fails locally on my laptop. Is ther
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997
so that is two situations
1. it is known to be powered off (no sendStop() should be performed at all)
2. it is unknown because their is no report. Wouldn't one first check the
host t
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2024
@karuturi we have 2 LGTMs on this trivial PR, I guess we can proceed and
merge it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user cloudsadhu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1813
added logic to handle global level full clone setting.
full clone parameter are handled differently (as per code its referring in
3 places due to that even if we set the full clone parame
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1997
@DaanHoogland In the case of VM_POWER_STATE handler, if PowerOff or
PowerReportMissing state is encountered,
handlePowerOffReportWithNoPendingJobsOnVM() is called. If the VM is already in
sto
Mike,
you need to get a newer f5 jar (icontrol)
didn't dive into getting the f5 jar yet as I'm not using it. disabling works ;)
On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 10:22 PM, Tutkowski, Mike
wrote:
> javac 1.8.0_121
>
> By removing F5, though, I just got a successful compile. :)
>
> On 4/4/17, 2:19 PM, "Rafae
Github user DaanHoogland commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2024
trivial enough: LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user jayakarteek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1918
@nvazquez @rafaelweingartner
Done.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user SudharmaJain commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/876#discussion_r109859606
--- Diff:
plugins/storage/volume/cloudbyte/src/org/apache/cloudstack/storage/datastore/lifecycle/ElastistorPrimaryDataStoreLifeCycle.java
---
@@ -3
Github user borisstoyanov commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2024
ping @DaanHoogland @PaulAngus @rhtyd for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user jayapalu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1917
There are two LGTMs and there are not test failures in the test results. So
marking tag:mergeready
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
60 matches
Mail list logo
