If you are going from VMware to CloudStack Managed VMware, this is
something I have done quite a bit. I even built a tool to do this:
https://github.com/swill/migrate2cs
This is not a polished product. Well, it is pretty polished once you get
it setup, but the setup is a bit complicated to get s
Hello,
*An update to the migration task:*
We have installed Cloudstack onto a vm on VMware to work around the
cross-hypervisor migration issue. Now the underlying hypervisor would be
the ESXi server for both setups (VMware and Cloudstack).
Currently, we create the corresponding equivalent infras
Hi Rohit.
I would suggest the 1829 [1]
It's a big problem with XenServer and more than 2 datadisks attached per VM
(HVM)
[1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1829
-Original Message-
From: Rohit Yadav [mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com]
Sent: quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017
All,
With upcoming features such as the application service (container service), and
existing features such as SAML, they all need some sort of certificate
management and the idea with the proposed feature is to build a pluggable
certificate authority manager (CA Manager). I would like to kick
All,
This is to discuss a new feature (plugin) for CloudStack, please see the issue
and FS.
Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9998
FS:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Metrics+Exporter+for+Prometheus
Target release: 4.11 or later
Outback,
I think there exists some initial support for XenServer 7.1 in 4.9.2.0,
4.9/branch however consider installing/upgrading to 4.10.0.0 (once it is
announced) which should have the support.
- Rohit
From: Outback Dingo
Sent: 12 July 2017 21:22:53
To: us
Thanks for the interest Simon, the feature has two HA provider (plugins, one
for simulator and another for KVM+NFS) that can be used as reference
implementations.
- Rohit
From: Simon Weller
Sent: 12 July 2017 20:59:38
To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: Nathan J
> Op 12 juli 2017 om 23:41 schreef Marcus :
>
>
> We've also seen in the past initiatives like object store and 'secondary
> storage free' zones. We may not want to cement the idea that we have
> secondary storage as a mountable filesystem that is highly available.
>
+10
I would prefer that a
