Re: [I] Support For Scheduled Volume Snapshots [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala commented on issue #116: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/116#issuecomment-3298211343 @Pearl1594 @vishesh92 Is it possible to include this issue for 0.6 release -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

Re: [PR] Add support for autoscale VM groups [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

Pearl1594 commented on PR #213: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/213#issuecomment-3299837038 @kiranchavala I've addressed your comments/concerns -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [PR] Add support for autoscale VM groups [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

Pearl1594 commented on PR #213: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/213#issuecomment-3298172545 Thanks @kiranchavala. I am working on adding the support for those. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please

Re: [PR] feat: make cidr optional for L2 networks [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

sidshas03 commented on PR #219: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/219#issuecomment-3298488703 Hi @DaanHoogland & @kiranchavala, Just putting down the commit history clearly so you both know what happened and why: - First I added the unit tests for L

Re: [PR] Add `cloudstack_project` resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala commented on PR #167: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/167#issuecomment-3284495000 @ianc769 could you please resolve the conflict -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub

Re: [PR] Documentation related to Persistent domainXML [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #562: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/562#issuecomment-3291428818 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/562. (QA-JID 427) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [PROPOSAL] 4.20.2.0 release

Hi Andreas, Yes, we can merge the pull request https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/10213 once it is approved and verified. -Wei On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 3:33 PM Andreas S. Kerber wrote: > Hi Wei, > > thanks for your hard work! > > Would it be possible to merge #9460 ? This bug is bugging

Re: [I] Improvement request - Support the following resource creation via terraform [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala closed issue #82: Improvement request - Support the following resource creation via terraform URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/82 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and

Re: [PR] Resolve merge conflicts for pod and cluster resources (PR #217) [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

DaanHoogland commented on PR #220: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/220#issuecomment-3298837387 > Hi @kiranchavala, I’ve resolved the merge conflicts ([9258f6c](https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/commit/9258f6cc73c2255f8f325ae074d0445374

Re: [PR] Add `cloudstack_project` resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala merged PR #167: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/167 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u

Re: [PR] feat: make cidr optional for L2 networks [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala closed pull request #219: feat: make cidr optional for L2 networks URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/219 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to t

Re: [I] Error using AutoScaleProfile [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala commented on issue #173: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/173#issuecomment-3298676591 @ferdinandopaes #213 will solve the issue -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a

Re: [I] Inconsistent result when creating cloudstack_firewall [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala closed issue #115: Inconsistent result when creating cloudstack_firewall URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/115 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above t

Re: [I] **Error when creating private gateway** [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala closed issue #172: **Error when creating private gateway** URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/issues/172 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the spe

Re: [PR] add `cloudstack_cluster` data source and documentation [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

DaanHoogland merged PR #222: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/222 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-u

Re: [PR] add bypass_vlan_check to network and private_gateway [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala commented on PR #166: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/166#issuecomment-3298508941 @Longsight could you please make sure failing tests pass -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on t

Re: [PR] Add `cloudstack_limits` data source and resource [cloudstack-terraform-provider]

kiranchavala commented on PR #197: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/197#issuecomment-3298241729 @ianc769 could you resolve the conflicts and make sure the tests paas -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, pl

Re: [PR] Create Instance from Backup on another Zone [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #556: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/556#issuecomment-3298017904 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/556. (QA-JID 434) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [PR] Create Instance from Backup on another Zone [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #556: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/556#issuecomment-3298008977 @abh1sar a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

Re: [PR] Add documentation for Instance setting for machine type on KVM [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #559: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/559#issuecomment-3297492855 @nvazquez a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service

Re: [PR] Add documentation for Instance setting for machine type on KVM [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #559: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/559#issuecomment-3297502495 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/559. (QA-JID 433) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [PR] Add documentation for Instance setting for machine type on KVM [cloudstack-documentation]

nvazquez commented on PR #559: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/559#issuecomment-3297484416 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to th

[PR] CKS: update doc of creating ISO [cloudstack-documentation]

weizhouapache opened a new pull request, #565: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/565 (no comment) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment.

Re: [PR] Create Instance from Backup on another Zone [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #556: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/556#issuecomment-3297057375 QA-Doc build preview: https://qa.cloudstack.cloud/builds/docs-build/pr/556. (QA-JID 432) -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to

Re: [PR] Create Instance from Backup on another Zone [cloudstack-documentation]

blueorangutan commented on PR #556: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/556#issuecomment-3297048337 @abh1sar a Jenkins job has been kicked to build the document. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.

Re: [PR] Create Instance from Backup on another Zone [cloudstack-documentation]

abh1sar commented on PR #556: URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-documentation/pull/556#issuecomment-3297044900 @blueorangutan docbuild -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the

Re: [LTS] Extend LTS support to 24 months

João et al, How I read Rohit's proposal, and what I agree to, is that we do not set a feature release schedule yet, but only focus and commit to setting an LTS release schedule of once a year. Those releases would than be maintained for two years. It will than be easier to refuse features for t

test capacity

People, During the current release process we noticed that a lot of potentially good fixes and enhancements don't seem to make the cut due to lack of testing. We do want things to be tested before they go in, but the effort it requires ATM is too high to keep up with the valuable code contributed.