are discussion ways to enable
> people who will not be on place, to also participate. For this reason, is
> there someone, who cannot travel, but still wants to participate in the
> hackathon? Please, shout out!
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
understood, again, great idea
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:50 AM Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
> Op 29/10/2024 om 11:11 schreef Daan Hoogland:
> > sounds good @Wido den Hollander ,
> >
> > several questions come to mind (most of them in the realm of 'details
lay/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+Object+Store+Framework
> [1]: https://doc.powerdns.com/authoritative/http-api/index.html
> [2]: https://www.ibm.com/products/ns1-connect/api
> [3]: https://my.rcodezero.at/openapi/
> [4]: https://api.gandi.net/docs/livedns/
> [5]: https://developers.cloudflare.com/api/
>
--
Daan
t; wido-macbook:cloudstack wido$ grep -iIR acronis *
> wido-macbook:cloudstack wido$
>
> Does anybody have an idea?
>
> Wido
>
--
Daan
parti to become a PMC member and we are pleased
> > to announce that they have accepted.
> >
> > Suresh has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
> > project run smoothly. He also has served as the release manager for
> > CloudStack releases 4.16.1.0 and 4.19.1.0.
> >
> > Please join me in congratulating Suresh
> >
> > Regards,
> > Rohit Yadav
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
ch to Ubuntu 24.04 which it
> seems the instructions were for?
>
> I guess my first goal is to seem it working with Minio and then try to get
> it working with HyperStore.
>
> Any advice appreciated,
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom.
--
Daan
branch. That
> > means any feature must be in by the first week of September. Only
> > accept critical/blocker issues until the third week of September.
> > - On the third week of September, cut 4.20.0.0 RC1 and further RCs if
> > necessary, start/conclude vote, and finish release work.
> >
> > I hope to have your support with fixing/testing/reviewing open issues
> > and PRs. I'll post a new update next week.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/30
> >
--
Daan
inion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> For users convenience, the packages from this release candidate (RC2) and
> 4.19.1.0 systemvm templates are available here:
> https://download.cloudstack.org/testing/4.19.1.0-RC2/
> https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
--
Daan
people,
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/9385 contains a draft of
what I mean. I think we can make this work. Thanks to Guto who wrote
the views version of this.
any comments welcome
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 2:58 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> good point Wei, So we'll have
good point Wei, So we'll have to create a separate dir/procedure from
that if the views (that need to be created after the tables.
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 2:14 PM Wei ZHOU wrote:
>
> +1
>
> procedures can be created before db upgrades
>
> -Wei
>
> On Fri, Jul 12,
melab env; likely
> > > my fault while moving DB servers and forgot the -R option where I
> > > forgot to backup the routines)
--
Daan
ument.
>
> I would be really grateful for any help on this topic.
>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Gaurav Joshi
>
--
Daan
spond with your comments or put them in
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8667
regards,
On 2024/02/16 09:17:02 Vishesh Jindal wrote:
> I have created a PR with the changes
> here:https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8667
>
> I propose that we enable it. As Daan suggest
can benefit from:
> 1. A fixed release schedule;
> 2. A mechanism to introduce disruptive changes, so that the project can
> evolve and not be chained to the same features/API/limitation/technical
> debts forever.
>
> Furthermore, having a schedule allows us to have a project roadmap, that
> outlines the future deprecations, changes and big features.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> João Jandre.
>
--
Daan
h
> gets published via
> https://github.com/cloudstack/terraform-provider-cloudstack as the registry
> also has a strict repo naming policy (due to which it can't use the repo
> under Apache org).
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
--
Daan
an
install -Dnoredist -DfailIfNoTests=false -pl server
-Dtest=ActionEventInterceptorTest`. Only when building the entire
system with `mvn clean install -P developer,systemvm -Dnoredist` do
these fail.
Any hints/clues or similar experiences?
thanks,
--
Daan
t;
> Vote will be open for 120 hours (due to the weekend).
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
--
Daan
ed.
>
> Slavka has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
> project run smoothly
>
> Please join me in congratulating Slavka!
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
ave accepted.
>
> Kiran has been a long time CloudStack contributor and has created
> over a hundred issues on Github. Being a committer enables easier
> contribution to the project and enable better productivity.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Kiran!
>
> Regards.
--
Daan
I was pointed out that I did not formally vote in this mai:
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 1:02 PM Daan wrote:
>
> Kiran, the release looks good, the format of the hashes is a bit off but on
> manual inspection they seem ok. I created a PR to correct thsi for next time
ng the same bug (other
> driver) is currently in 4.19.0.
> But I feel bad knowing, that I would introduce a bug for other storage
> drivers.
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 10:30 AM Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
> > Rene, is this a blocker (or critical issue) in your opinion ?
gt; > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
> >
> > Vote will be open for 120 hours (due to the weekend).
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
--
Daan
Kiran, the release looks good, the format of the hashes is a bit off but on
manual inspection they seem ok. I created a PR to correct thsi for next time :
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack-terraform-provider/pull/108
I don't think that needs to block this RC
On 2024/04/04 06:30:22 Kiran Chava
ontributing to Apache
> CloudStack's success in any way I can. Please feel free to reach out if you
> have any PRs or issues you think I could help with.
>
> Warmest regards,
> Sina Kashipazha
--
Daan
devs and users,
The PMC have asked Rene Peinthor to become a committer to the Apache
CloudStack project and they have accepted.
Please join me in congratulating Rene.
--
Daan
ack project.
>
> I would like to thank everyone for the support I've received over the past
> year.
>
> Please join me in congratulating Daniel, the new CloudStack PMC Chair / VP.
>
> Best Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
--
Daan
rward merge after the weekend.
--
Daan
agree that we could codify our protocol first.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2024 at 5:54 AM Rohit Yadav wrote:
>
> Daniel, Daan, others,
>
> Could you explain why you’d break CloudStack’s rest-like APIs? Isn’t the
> intention of dropping the 4. as we may never see a 5.x that involves major
>
process. This should enable better productivity.
Please join me in congratulating Vishesh.
--
on behalf of the PMC, Daan
in the future. Just asking ..!
>
>
> > On 19-Feb-2024, at 10:49 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
> >
> > Hi Daan,
> >
> > Can you clarify what we are actually voting on please.
> >
> > In thread that is linked I've seen:
> >
> > "[the vote]
Paul,
On Mon, Feb 19, 2024 at 6:21 PM Paul Angus wrote:
>
> Hi Daan,
>
> Can you clarify what we are actually voting on please.
>
> In thread that is linked I've seen:
>
> "[the vote] will be to adjust to the semantic versioning system."
> - you can
tps://lists.apache.org/thread/lh45w55c3jmhm7w2w0xgdvlw78pd4p87
--
Daan
e any feedback for us.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Guto Veronezi
> Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2024 18:34
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] version naming : drop the 4.
>
> Daan,
>
> As we st
If an update/comment occur on stale issues or pull requests, the stale
> label will be removed and the timer will restart
>
> Instead of using the defaults, I would like to:
>
> *
> mark the issue/PR stale after 90 days
> *
> close the stale issue/PR after 30 days
>
> Let me know if this sounds good. I will create the PR to set this up.
>
> Regards,
> Vishesh
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
bump,
@Daniel Salvador is there any technical reason to keep the 4? any
reason why there must be a 5 instead of a 21, 22 or 23? We are
maintaining 4 number semantic versioning for no reason, as I see it.
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 12:02 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> Daniel, "technical&q
t; Please let me know if you have any thoughts/comments.
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A4.19.1.0
> [2]
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A4.19.1.0+is%3Aopen
> [3] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/31
>
>
> Regards,
> Suresh
>
>
>
--
Daan
fact that Huawei has still not answered my request to
> publish the OBS SDK with Maven coordinates, I assume that this is the
> "chinese way" of saying "Nope, not going to happen!".
sounds so :(
>
>
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
> R. Feicht
>
> sc syn
sues/new/choose
--
Daan
People,
we brought the new website. Please all have a look at
https://cloudstack.apache.org
thanks for any feedback
--
Daan
The vote has passed with
6 * +1
0 * 0
0* -1
On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 1:32 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> LS,
>
> I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions
> before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vote threat anyway
> there are some non-blocking rest point
also made convenience binaries available on the Apache CloudStack
> download page, and can be found at:
>
> - https://download.cloudstack.org/el/7/
>
> - https://download.cloudstack.org/el/8/
>
> - https://download.cloudstack.org/el/9/
>
> - https://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu/dists/
>
> - https://www.shapeblue.com/cloudstack-packages/
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Abhishek
--
Daan
LS,
I am not sure this is still needed after all the discussions
before,but I would like to start a lazy consent vote threat anyway
there are some non-blocking rest points mentioned and we can
administer those in the repo for the site [1]
so without further ado;
Do we want to go life with the web
5 71691 - 299
> http://www.scsynergy.com | ronald.fei...@scsynergy.com
> Sitz der Gesellschaft Bodenheim, HRB 8830, Amtsgericht Mainz,
> Geschäftsführer: Christian Reichert
--
Daan
_
> From: Sven Vogel
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2024 18:30
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> priv...@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users
> Subject: Re: new website design
>
> +1 looks nice
>
> Am Montag, den 01/22/2024 um 11:46 schrieb Nux:
please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
--
Daan
ties are needed sometimes so we can evolve,
> > leaving old ways and deprecated technologies and techniques in the past.
> >
> > *The main point is: *we have to understand the technical reasons for the
> > proposal and what we expect from it before deciding anything.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
> >
> >
> >
--
Daan
gt;
> I just replied the discussion thread and I would like to discuss it a
> little bit further before voting.
>
> Best regards,
> Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
>
> On 1/25/24 11:47, Daan Hoogland wrote:
> > LS,
> >
> > As previously discussed [1] there
for no strong opinion or objects either way
-1 for disagree (add your reason to be counted)
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/lh45w55c3jmhm7w2w0xgdvlw78pd4p87
--
Daan
h version will be LTS, how long the
> > LTS/normal version will be supported, etc.
> >
> > Maybe a vote in the dev/users/pmc mailing list?
> >
>
> I think that's a good decision.
>
> @ Daan: Do you want to start one?
>
> I'd prefer the .MM rel
t; On 2024-01-23 14:49, Wido den Hollander wrote:
> > > We could look at Ubuntu, and other projects, and call it 2025.01 if we
> > > release it in Jan 2025.
> > >
> > > A great post on the website, mailinglists and social media could
> > > explain the change in versioning, but that the code doesn't change that
> > > much.
> > >
> > > Project has matured, etc, etc.
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
Daan
snapshot/backup for VMware (without needing Veeam) to make it similar
> > to what ACS does with XenServer and KVM; Operators backup (which are
> > different from end-user backups); and many other items.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Best regards,
As we get no major issues on it and we already voted to have this
design applied, is it alright to deploy this in the coming weeks?
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 8:31 PM Daan Hoogland wrote:
>
> devs and users,
>
> back in august we had a small discussion about a new website design,
>
from the community, so
> > register as an attendee here:
> > https://www.eventbrite.nl/e/cloudstack-and-ceph-day-netherlands-2024-tickets-700177167757
> >
> > Look forward to meeting you in Amsterdam!
>
> Yes! That's like my backyard. I'll be there!
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
--
Daan
o
the status of major and dropping the 4..
technically this won't be an issue as 20 > 4 and out upgrade scheme
supports a step like that.
any thoughts?
--
Daan
agreed, thanks Abhi
On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 1:07 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks you for your vote Nicolas and Daan.
> Thank you Wei for the tests. The reported issue will be a blocker for people
> installing and upgrading on Ubuntu hosts.
> We alread
viewed on the staging site [2]
Please all have a look and give me any feedback you may have, so we
can move this forward.
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/fopjc3r4hjkp9nbkj9xzoxv406rowkso
[2] https://cloudstack.staged.apache.org/
--
Daan
https://download.cloudstack.org/systemvm/4.19/
> >
> > The vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> > "(binding)" with their vote?
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abhishek
> >
--
Daan
ing the vote, can PMC members please be sure to indicate
> "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
--
Daan
users and dev,
The PMC have invited Harikrishna to join their ranks and he has
gracefully accepted. Please join me in congratulating Hari.
--
Daan
community,
The PMC have invited João Jandre Paraquetti to join the project as a
committer and the invitation was gratefully accepted.
Please join me in welcoming João.
Congratulations João,
--
Daan
community,
The PMC has decided Vladi to become a committer and he has gracefully
accepted. Please join me in welcoming Vladi to the project as
committer.
Congratulations Vladi
--
Daan
t;
> [1]:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pulls?q=is%3Apr+milestone%3A4.18.2.0+is%3Aopen
> [2]:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+milestone%3A4.18.2.0
>
> Best regards,
> João Jandre
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
at do you think?
Also, How would you word it instead, João?
> On 12/4/23 10:51, Daan Hoogland wrote:
...
> > Fatal:
> > - include a reason why the system can not function anymore,
> > - be followed by a System.exit() call,
> > - include a stack trace if it is reas
igher version
I think we must address these as soon as we have a release.
Are there any other issues to address?
--
Daan
can refine this to a generic guideline to be used in reviews.
--
Daan
, constructive and
pleasant to work with.
please join me in congratulating Bryan
--
Daan
ny project
> governance related matters such as releases related discussions, releases
> voting, and any form of consensus and decision making.
>
> I've proposed a PR for this here where the discussions feature is tied to
> users@ ML:
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/8274/files
>
> Thoughts and feedback?
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
--
Daan
upcoming
4.19 release.
please join me in congratulating Abhishek
--
Daan
2023
>
> Also, if you have got an active PR with a new feature or fix that you
> would like to see in 4.19.0.0 release please comment with your interest on
> the Github item.
>
> Regards,
> Abhishek
>
>
>
> From: Daan Hoogland
&
process.
> >
> > If there are no objections, I propose to create a cloudstack-csbench
> > repo in which this tool can be developed. Thoughts and feedback?
> > Thanks.
> >
> >
> > Regards.
>
--
Daan
Devs,
Please keep an eye on the PRs you want merged for 4.19 on a daily basis. As
we get closer and more gets merge the integration work get more continuous
(pun intended :P ). There are a lot of conflicts to be handled by authors
at the moment.
regards,
tps://lists.apache.org/thread/ymqtk7y7623fvnm7bxntk36rdjn1q03k
> [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/milestone/24
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
t NIC.
>
> What do you guys think about this scenario? Do you have other
> perspectives/opinions on this matter?
>
> Best regards,
> Henrique Sato (hsato03)
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7859
>
--
Daan
gt; I hope to get support from all active contributors during the process of
> reviewing/testing/merging the PRs. You can find the open issues and PRs at
> the 4.19.0.0 Github milestone [2]. Ping me (@shwstppr) or Daan
> (@DaanHoogland) on your issues and PRs, that are to be included in 4
repared a PR here:
> > https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7577
> >
> > This PR upgrades mockito from v3.2.4 to v3.12.4 and removes the usage
> > of PowerMock from utils module.
> >
> >
> > Let me know if you have any questions/concerns.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vishesh
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Daan
-01-XCP-IBM NOK
>
> Would there be a procedure to migrate the VMs? Shut down the VM, migrate
> the volume, delete the virtual router etc...?
>
> Best regards,
> --
>
>
> *Olivier GUIN*
> *Direction*
> Tel. : 05 94 31 02 44
> Fax : 09 76 41 08 39
> Mail : olivier.g...@ariasnet.com
> Site : www.ariasnet.com
>
--
Daan
itch to another UI pkg building tool (such as yarn)? Thoughts?
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache [PROJECT]
has invited Daniel Salvador to become a PMC member and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Daniel has contributed in the past and has shown effort to make the
project run smoothly
please join me in congratulating Daniel
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache [PROJECT]
has invited Sina Kashipazha to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
Sina has been active as a contributor in several ways; code, testing,
talks, documentation
Please join me in welcoming Sina
The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache CloudStack
has invited Jown Bampton to become a committer and we are pleased
to announce that they have accepted.
John is mostly active on CI and build specific issues.
please join me in welcoming John to the project
--
Daan
more disks; or deploy vm but not start it, attach as many data disks
> as we want and then start it.
>
> 5. Show user-data and affinity (placement) groups as a first-class
> step, not hidden under advanced menu.
>
> 6. Offering groups or bundles: introduce way to group/bundle
> compute/data offerings; for example, I want to see CPU optimised offerings,
> memory optimiised offerings, specialised offerings (say GPU) etc.
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
FYI,
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-24823
On Fri, Jul 21, 2023 at 8:48 AM Vishesh Jindal
wrote:
> +1
> If possible, please include "Update with Rebase" option as well.
>
> Thanks,
> Vishesh
>
> ____
> From
this simple functionality.
So my proposal is to ask infra to enable this:
[image: image.png]
[1]
https://github.blog/changelog/2022-02-03-more-ways-to-keep-your-pull-request-branch-up-to-date/
any objections or concerns anyone can think of?
--
Daan
aise a
> Github issue. Thanks.
>
> [1]
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Git+-+.asf.yaml+features#Git.asf.yamlfeatures-AssigningexternalcollaboratorswiththetriageroleonGitHub
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
Giles, just about point one as the others follow from it.
On Fri, Jun 9, 2023 at 10:17 AM Giles Sirett wrote:
>
> Hi Daan - thanks for your input. Some comments inline below
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Giles
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Daan Hoo
sal is to bring consistency and use the term Instance
>
> From brief discussions, I know other people favour other terms and may have
> objections to the term Instance (despite it having been in use in ACS for
> many years) - but happy to take all inputs if people feel this is just wrong.
>
>
>
>
>
> Kind Regards
> Giles
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
om/apache/cloudstack/pull/7577
>
> This PR upgrades mockito from v3.2.4 to v3.12.4 and removes the usage of
> PowerMock from utils module.
>
>
> Let me know if you have any questions/concerns.
>
> Regards,
> Vishesh
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
you should be able to edit now
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023 at 3:44 PM Sina Kashipazha
wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I just created one, my username is "esterlinkof"
>
>
> --- Original Message ---
> On Friday, June 2nd, 2023 at 15:22, Daan Hoogland
> wrote:
>
>
; https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Marvin+-+Testing+with+Python
>
> Kind regards,
> Sina
--
Daan
Instances to the KVM Hypervisor"
> https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/7127
>
> I am really looking forward to collaborating with and learning from this
> amazing community.
>
> Thank you,
> Regards,
> Ayush Pandey
>
--
Daan
at 2:14 AM Daniel Salvador
wrote:
> Daan,
>
> IMHO, proxying libraries would bring us more disadvantages than benefits.
> If we define that the standard is to proxy libraries such as Utils, Log4J,
> and others, we would have to proxy all of them (even Spring); it would
> req
n
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > Best regards,
> > João Jandre (JoaoJandre)
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/261j7m0p5mr4q7yclvo49mwhkxz4yov2
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131
> >
> >
>
--
Daan
> > > >
> > > > Best regards,
> > > > Daniel Salvador (gutoveronezi)
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 1, 2023 at 4:10 AM Abhishek Kumar
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Great work.
> > > > > Though I feel this is a 5.0 change. I agree with Wei that this
> would
> > > > create
> > > > > too much overhead for upcoming releases. 4.18 was pushed ahead a
> few
> > > > months
> > > > > and we may end up on a similar path.
> > > > > Also, reload4j is still actively maintained so I don't think this
> is
> > > > > urgent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Abhishek
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 at 18:28, João Jandre Paraquetti <
> > > > j...@scclouds.com.br
> > > > > >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > In PR #7131 (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131) I
> > have
> > > > > > proposed to normalize ACS's loggers, and more importantly,
> upgrade
> > > the
> > > > > > library log4j to log4j2 version 2.19.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Log4j2 has a lot of features that could offer benefits to ACS:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Async Loggers - performance similar to logging switched off
> > > > > > * Custom log levels
> > > > > > * Automatically reload its configuration upon modification
> > without
> > > > > > loosing log events during reconfigurations.
> > > > > > * Java 8-style lambda support for lazy logging (which enables
> > > methods
> > > > > > to be executed only when necessary, i.e.: the right log
> level)
> > > > > > * Log4j 2 is garbage-free (or at least low-garbage) since
> version
> > > 2.6
> > > > > > * Plugin Architecture - easy to extend by building custom
> > > components
> > > > > > * Log4j 2 API is separated from the Log4j 2 implementation.
> > > > > > * Log4j 2 API supports more than just logging Strings:
> > > CharSequences,
> > > > > > Objects and custom Messages. Messages allow support for
> > > interesting
> > > > > > and complex constructs to be passed through the logging
> system
> > > and
> > > > > > be efficiently manipulated. Users are free to create their
> own
> > > > > > Message types and write custom Layouts, Filters and Lookups
> to
> > > > > > manipulate them.
> > > > > > * Concurrency improvements: log4j2 uses java.util.concurrent
> > > > libraries
> > > > > > to perform locking at the lowest level possible. Log4j-1.x
> has
> > > > known
> > > > > > deadlock issues.
> > > > > > * Configuration via XML, JSON, YAML, properties configuration
> > files
> > > > or
> > > > > > programmatically.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > In my personal experience using it in some other projects, log4j2
> > is
> > > > > > easier to work with in general, has better performance, and is an
> > > > active
> > > > > > project with constant development, innovation, and security
> > patches.
> > > > > > Moreover, it is under a well known and trusted open source
> > > > organization.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The change proposed in PR #7131
> > > > > > (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131) has been tested
> > and
> > > > > > validated in a lot of different scenarios by different people. We
> > > have
> > > > > > already tested the logging in the management server, usage,
> agents,
> > > and
> > > > > > system VMs; all of that using KVM and Vmware + Veeam. Most
> feature
> > > sets
> > > > > > were tested, create/delete/update VMs, disks, cresate snapshots,
> > user
> > > > > > management and so on.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The proposal has been discussed since January, 2023 in the PR
> > > > > > (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131), but I have
> been
> > > > > > requested to bring it to the mailing list. I would love to hear
> > your
> > > > > > opinions on it, also, any reviews to the PR would be welcome.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Daan
+1, you have my support @weiz...@apache.org
On Thu, 4 May 2023, 10:02 Rohit Yadav, wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for volunteering Wei, yes our community absolutely will benefits
> with a 4.18.1.0 maintenance release!
>
>
> Regards.
>
>
> From: Wei ZHOU
> Sent: Thursda
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 12:01 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
> Daan, Rohit and others,
>
> Personally, I don't see log4j2 PR alone or one particular feature/PR that
> can be the reason for managing the release. Though I certainly understand
> it may create some additional
On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 11:19 AM Rohit Yadav
wrote:
> +1
>
> Thanks for volunteering Abhishek. As you've worked already as a RM for
> CloudStack LTS maintenance releases that you've shared and I think you have
> all the necessary experience to work as the 4.19 RM.
stack/cloudmonkey-6.3.0/
>
>
> PGP release keys (signed using 4A64E2F46BBC136DD92D71FB5B7DEFE0508A4AD8)
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/cloudstack/KEYS
>
> The vote will be open until 5th May, 2023.
>
> For sanity in tallying the vote, can PMC members please be sure to
> indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and the reason why)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Daan
ly, sometime in Q3 2023, with the planning,
> triaging, bug-fixing, etc to get back on the traditional two-release per
> year cycle. With this we can aim to cut the RC sometime in October. I will
> propose a detailed timeline soon.
> >
> > I hope to have your support. Please let me know if you have any
> thoughts/comments.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Abhishek
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
--
Daan
sed since January, 2023 in the PR
> (https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131), but I have been
> requested to bring it to the mailing list. I would love to hear your
> opinions on it, also, any reviews to the PR would be welcome.
--
Daan
/cloudstack/pull/7083
[2] https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/7131
--
Daan
1 - 100 of 3674 matches
Mail list logo